의식 없는 피의자에 대한 혈액채취와 영장주의
Unconscious Suspect’s Blood Taken without Her Consent and Warrant Principle
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Because compulsory investigation may arrogate fundamental human right gravely,criminal procedure law regulates requirement and process to it. Investigation agency and court have to keep to such due process. Especially when drunken driving suspect is fallen into unconsciousness, blood of suspect is important proof. Criminal investigation agency want to extract and use as evidence. In this case, investigation agency need warrant for her search and seizure without her consent. However according to Korean Supreme Court(98do968, 1999), criminal investigation can ask doctor and nurse to extract unconscious suspect’s blood and use as a evidence on the premise of doctor or nurse’s consent, not suspect running article 218 of criminal procedure law. However, this decision soil ideal of warrant principle. In warrant principle, investigation agency present the warrant to deprived person of the benefit and protection of the law because of such investigation. In order to protect suspect’s information, article 218 of criminal procedure law have to be interpreted strictly. Ultimately, legislation for extracting and using suspect’s blood as a criminal evidence is needed.
Abstract
Because compulsory investigation may arrogate fundamental human right gravely,criminal procedure law regulates requirement and process to it. Investigation agency and court have to keep to such due process. Especially when drunken driving suspect is fallen into unconsciousness, blood of suspect is important proof. Criminal investigation agency want to extract and use as evidence. In this case, investigation agency need warrant for her search and seizure without her consent. However according to Korean Supreme Court(98do968, 1999), criminal investigation can ask doctor and nurse to extract unconscious suspect’s blood and use as a evidence on the premise of doctor or nurse’s consent, not suspect running article 218 of criminal procedure law. However, this decision soil ideal of warrant principle. In warrant principle, investigation agency present the warrant to deprived person of the benefit and protection of the law because of such investigation. In order to protect suspect’s information, article 218 of criminal procedure law have to be interpreted strictly. Ultimately, legislation for extracting and using suspect’s blood as a criminal evidence is needed.
참고문헌 (23)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법" (2009)
- 배종대, , ~ (2009)
- 임동규, "형사소송법" (2011)
- 이상돈, "사례연습 형사소송법" (2004)
- 이상돈, "형사소송원론" (1998)
- 이상돈, "혈액압수와 정보지배권", 저스티스, 34(4)
- 이재상, "형사소송법" (2009)
- 이재상, "강제채뇨와 강제채혈" (1998), 고시계
- "법원실무제요" (2008), 법원행정처
- 권순민, "형사절차상 제액의 강제채취에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 설민수, "인터넷서비스제공자를 통해서 본 제3자 보유정보에 대한 영장주의의 실효성", 법조, 58(8), pp.144~203 (2009), 법조협회
- 손기식, "교통헌법" (2000)
- 심희기, "과학적 수사방법과 그 한계" (1994), 형사정책연구
- 인문교, "모발에 의한 마약류 감정" (1995), 법조
- 조기영, "피의자의 동의 없는 혈액 압수의 적법성", 형사법연구, 23(2), pp.261~284 (2011), 한국형사법학회
- 한영수, "음주측정을 위한 동의없는 채혈과 혈액의 압수", 형사판례연구, (9) (1999)
- 김하중, "수사상 강제채혈의 법적 문제점과 해결방안 -음주운전자에 대한 강제채혈과 위법수집증거 배제법칙을 중심으로", 법조, 57(9), pp.5~46 (2008), 법조협회
- Joshua Dressler, "Understanding Criminal Procedure" (1999)
- Klaus Volk, "GRUNDKURS StPO" (2004)
- 佐蕂文哉, "刑事訴訟法 判例百選(5版)" (1986)
- 中井憲治, "刑事訴訟の爭點(新版)" (1991)
- 平松, "住基ネツトと個人情報保護", 法律時報, 79(12)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요" (2008)