財團法人의 設立을 위한 出捐財産의 歸屬時期
A Study on Juridical Foundation is a Incorporation and Time of Belonging of Property Given by Endowment
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current Civil Code Article 48 is (1) In a case where the incorporated foundation is formed through a disposition inter vivos, the property given by way of endowment shall become the property of the juristic person as from the time when the juristic person is incorporated. (2) In a case where the incorporated foundation is formed through a will, the property so given shall be deemed to have vested in the juristic person as from the time when the will became effective. The current Civil Code Article 48 is amended principle form that takes transfer of real rights principle intention about changes old Civil Code neglect inadvertently by Article 42 in harmony with the current Civil Code has not been any. Therefore,since civil law enforcement to the present theory has been sharply opposed. In addition, we have superimposed the changes are not consistent precedents of the Supreme Court. Confrontation of these theories deal with the protection of the Foundation juridical person of any of the protect the safety of transactions will focus more on what comes from, The current civil code in interpreting Article 48 include the state that is impossible to find a solution. Thus, the Civil Code in Article 48 legislative on interpretation is suggested. First, a large number of Opinion Civil Code Article 48 “when a artificial person is established,” shall be interpreted as. About this principle form to understand the changes in property rights, taking the meaning of Article 48 to spare, Article 187 Article 48 so-called “other provisions of the law’ that a solution can be found in this passage. Second, while changes in property rights to principle intention that were taking care old Civil Code principle form taking Article 42 is amended to harmonize with the current civil law, so there can only be solved by on interpretation is suggested. Thus, the civil law to amend Article 48 is proposed as follows. First, the Civil Code Article 48 paragraphs 1 and 2 are retained term. Second, “If the registration in the case of items 1 and 2, foundations, you can not compete against a third party” paragraph 3. Each will be established “I think when the foundation has been established efficacy of the will occurs in the case of Section 2,” Section 4. Paragraph (4) “a testament to the effect of wills paragraph (2) if when the wills is finalized only see two juridical foundation” to be established, respectively.
Abstract
The current Civil Code Article 48 is (1) In a case where the incorporated foundation is formed through a disposition inter vivos, the property given by way of endowment shall become the property of the juristic person as from the time when the juristic person is incorporated. (2) In a case where the incorporated foundation is formed through a will, the property so given shall be deemed to have vested in the juristic person as from the time when the will became effective. The current Civil Code Article 48 is amended principle form that takes transfer of real rights principle intention about changes old Civil Code neglect inadvertently by Article 42 in harmony with the current Civil Code has not been any. Therefore,since civil law enforcement to the present theory has been sharply opposed. In addition, we have superimposed the changes are not consistent precedents of the Supreme Court. Confrontation of these theories deal with the protection of the Foundation juridical person of any of the protect the safety of transactions will focus more on what comes from, The current civil code in interpreting Article 48 include the state that is impossible to find a solution. Thus, the Civil Code in Article 48 legislative on interpretation is suggested. First, a large number of Opinion Civil Code Article 48 “when a artificial person is established,” shall be interpreted as. About this principle form to understand the changes in property rights, taking the meaning of Article 48 to spare, Article 187 Article 48 so-called “other provisions of the law’ that a solution can be found in this passage. Second, while changes in property rights to principle intention that were taking care old Civil Code principle form taking Article 42 is amended to harmonize with the current civil law, so there can only be solved by on interpretation is suggested. Thus, the civil law to amend Article 48 is proposed as follows. First, the Civil Code Article 48 paragraphs 1 and 2 are retained term. Second, “If the registration in the case of items 1 and 2, foundations, you can not compete against a third party” paragraph 3. Each will be established “I think when the foundation has been established efficacy of the will occurs in the case of Section 2,” Section 4. Paragraph (4) “a testament to the effect of wills paragraph (2) if when the wills is finalized only see two juridical foundation” to be established, respectively.
참고문헌 (124)
- 강태석, "민법총칙(제3판)" (2010), 법영사
- 강태성, "민법총칙(제4판)" (2011), 대명출판사
- 강태성, "신판 물권법" (2004), 대명출판사
- 고상룡, "민법총칙(전정판)" (1999), 법문사
- 고상룡, "물권법" (2001), 법문사
- 김민중, "민법총칙강의" (2006), 두성사
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙(신정판)" (1989), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙(신정수정판)" (1999), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙(제7판)" (2002), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "부동산물권변동의 연구" (1969), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "판례교재 물권법" (1973), 법문사
- 곽윤직, "후암민법논집" (1991), 박영사
- 김재형, "민법총칙 제8판(전면개정)" (2012), 박영사
- 권영준, "민법총칙(개정판)" (2003), 삼조사
- 권용우, "민법총칙(제5전정판)" (2003), 법문사
- 권용우, "물권법(제5전정판)" (2001), 법문사
- 권용우, "민법학의 쟁점" (2006), 신양사
- 권용우, "민법연습(증보판)" (1996), 법문사
- 권용우, "민사판례연구 Ⅰ" (2002), 신양사
- 김기선, "한국민법총칙(보정판)" (1981), 법문사
- 김대정, "민법총칙" (2012), 도서출판 피데스
- 김동훈, "민법총칙" (2011), 도서출판 동방문화사
- 김민중, "로스쿨 민법총칙" (2006), 청림출판
- 김상묵, "민법총칙(개정판)" (2008), 청목출판사
- 김상용, "민법총칙(전정판)" (1998), 법문사
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김상용, "물권법(개정판)" (1995), 법문사
- 김용한, "민법총칙론(전정판)" (1993), 박영사
- 김용한, "물권법론(재전정판)" (1993), 박영사
- 김용한, "재산법의 과제와 판례" (1989), 박영사
- 김용희, "개정 민법총칙" (1993), 건국대학교 출판부
- 김주수, "민법총칙" (1982), 삼영사
- 김주수, "친족ㆍ상속법(제10판)" (2011), 법문사
- 김주수, "민법사례연구" (1994), 삼영사
- 김준호, "민법총칙(제6판)" (2012), 법문사
- 김준호, "민법판례(제6판 보정)" (2005), 법문사
- 김준호, "민법강의" (2012), 법문사
- 김증한, "신고 민법총칙" (1983), 박영사
- 김증한, "신물권법(상)" (1960), 박영사
- 김증한, "민법총칙(제9판)" (1995), 박영사
- 김증한, "물권법(제9판)" (1997), 박영사
- 김증한, "신민법총칙" (1963), 박영사
- 김현태, "민법총칙" (1973), 교문사
- 김현태, "신물권법(상)" (1963), 일조각
- 김형배, "민법연습(신판)" (2007), 신조사
- 김규완, "민법학강의(제10판)" (2011), 신조사(서울)
- 노재호, "민법교안(제8판)" (2011), 문성
- 노종천, "민법총칙(제2판)" (2012), 법문사
- 류 정, "민법강의(상)" (2008), 형설
- 명승구, "민법학기초원리" (2002), 세창출판사
- 명승구, "민법총칙" (2007), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법(3정판)" (2009), 박영사
- 박종두, "민법총칙(제3판)" (2010), 삼영사
- 방순원, "신민법총칙" (1959), 한일문화사
- 백성기, "민법총칙(제3판)" (2011), 진원사
- 백태승, "민법총칙" (2010), 법문사
- 서광민, "민법총칙" (2007), 신론사
- 소성규, "민법총칙(제3판)" (2011), 동방문화사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2012), 박영사
- 송덕수, "신민법사례연습(제2판)" (2010), 박영사
- 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2011), 박영사
- 양형우, "민법의 세계(제4판)" (2011), 진원사
- 오시영, "민법총칙(개정판)" (2011), 학현사
- 윤철홍, "물권법강의" (1998), 박영사
- 이경희, "가족법(전정판)" (2008), 법원사
- 이광신, "민법총칙" (1984), 일신사
- 이근식, "민법강의(상)" (1980), 법문사
- 이병준, "민사사례연습(제4판)" (2011), 세창출판사
- 소성규, "민법총칙" (2001), 법률시대
- 이영규, "민법총칙" (2010), 동방문화사
- 이영섭, "신민법총칙강의" (1959), 박영사
- 이영준, "민법총칙(전정판)" (1995), 박영사
- 이영준, "한국민법론(물권편 : 신정2판)" (2004), 박영사
- 이은영, "민법총칙" (1996), 박영사
- 이은영, "리갈마인드 민법총칙" (2010), 박영사
- 이은영, "물권법(개정신판)" (2003), 박영사
- 이태재, "민법총칙" (1981), 법문사
- 장경학, "민법총칙(제3판)" (1995), 법문사
- 장경학, "물권법" (1987), 법문사
- 정광현, "신친족상속법요론" (1962), 법문사
- 정기웅, "민법총칙(제2판)" (2012), 법문사
- 정범석, "신민법총칙" (1961), 일한도서출판사
- 조성민, "민법연습" (2003), 두성사
- 조승현, "친족ㆍ상속법" (2009), 신조사
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2012), 홍문사
- 최 식, "민법총론" (1961), 박영사
- 현승종, "민법(총칙ㆍ물권)" (1970), 일신사
- 홍성재, "민법총칙" (2003), 대명문화사
- 홍성재, "부동산물권변동론" (1992), 법문사
- 황적인, "현대민법론 Ⅰ" (1980), 박영사
- 황적인, "현대민법론 Ⅱ(전정판)" (1987), 박영사
- 안법영, "민법개정안의견서" (2002), 삼지원
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅰ)" (1992), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주석민법 총칙 1" (2010), 한국사법행정학회
- 김증한, "학설ㆍ판례 주석민법(상)" (1973), 한국사법행정학회
- 김증한, "주석 채권각칙(Ⅳ)" (1987), 한국사법행정학회
- 김증한, "주석 민법총칙(상)" (1980), 한국사법행정학회
- 박준서, "주석민법(총칙 1)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 법무부, "민법(재산편) 개정 자료집", ~ (2004)
- 황적인, "주석민법(2) : 물권법" (1990), 법원사
- 谷口知平, "注釋民法(1)" (1980), 有斐閣
- 中川 淳, "現代の民法" (1990), 有信堂
- Larenz, K., "Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen Bűrgerlichen Rechts,7. Aufl." (1989), C.H. Beck
- "Műnchener Kommentar zum Bűrgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. 1, Műnchen", ~ (1978)
- 강석창, "민법 제186조의 적용범위와 한계, In 민법학의 회고와 전망(민법전 시행 30주년 기념논문집)" (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 강태성, "법인에 관한 민법개정방향", 법조 (2001), 법조협회
- 곽윤직, "재단법인설립에 있어서의 츌연재산의 귀속시기에 관하여 재론함", Fides, 10(5) (1964), 서울대
- 곽윤직, "재단법인설립에 있어서의 출연재산의 귀속시기", 법정, 18(10) (1963)
- 곽윤직, "민법개정론-총칙편", 법학, 24(4) (1983), 서울대
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙의 개정방향, In 민사판례연구(Ⅶ)" (1985), 경문사
- 권용우, "재단법인의 설립과 출연재산의 귀속시기(판례평석)", 주간 열림(열림 세무정보), ~ (1990)
- 권용우, "재단법인설립을 위한 출연부동산의 귀속시기", 고시계 (1999)
- 재단법인설립에 있어서의 출연재산의 귀속시기(판례평석), "김용한", 사법행정, ~ (1980)
- 김주수, "민사법학의 회고와 전망", 고시연구 (1998)
- 김증한, "형식주의의 채택에 따른 제문제", 법정, 14(12) (1959)
- 김증한, "등기를 요하는 물권변동", 고시계 (1959)
- 김학동, "재단법인에서의 출연재산의 귀속시기 ― 해석론을 중심으로 ―", 서울법학, 18(1), pp.165~208 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박병대, "< 민법 개정안에 대한 의견 >", 인권과 정의, 326, pp.1~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 송덕수, "재단법인의 출연재산의 귀속시기", 고시계 (1998)
- 양창수, "부동산물권변동에 관한 판례의 동향, In 민사판례연구(Ⅹ)" (1991), 박영사
- 梁彰洙, "財團法人出捐財産의 歸屬時期에 관한 獨逸民法의 規定 - 民法 제48조의 改正과 관련하여 -", 저스티스, 74, pp.86~102 (2003), 한국법학원
- 윤진수, "法人에 관한 民法改正案의 考察", 서울대학교 법학, 46(1), pp.65~99 (2005), 법학연구소
- 정환담, "민법 제48조의 법리(재단법인 출연재산의 법률관계", 민사법학, (9) (1993), 한국민사법학회
- 홍성재, "재단법인설립을 위한 출연재산의 귀속과 등기, In 민법판례해설 Ⅱ" (1992), 경세원