본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

민법상 재단법인설립에 관한 비교입법사적 연구

A comparative Study on Foundation in Civil Law

4

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently, there is a growing interest in foundation corporations, and legislative research and discussions on this field are actively progressing. In this course, the current legal system and content should be first identified. Foundations have long historical roots. The foundation corporation that we today perceive in the legal sense - namely, the foundation corporation as a legal entity with authority and power - is the product of the 19th century western law science. The German Civil Law faithfully reflected this concept, strictly distinguished between the corporation and the foundation corporation and differently specified the conditions for the establishment of both entities. The German Civil Law, when enacted, required the competent agency's approval for the establishment thereof and other requirements. Written methods were required, the establisher's right to withdraw was guaranteed and when the establishment was approved by the agency, invested assets were required to be transferred to the entity. In the case of the act of establishment associated with disposition by death, the approval application method by the heir apparent, etc. was specified. The ownership of invested assets is retrospectively returned to prior to the commencement of inheritance. Meanwhile, the Japanese Civil Law unified the establishment conditions of the corporate association and the foundation corporation, required both entities to obtain the approval of the competent agency, and provided that in the case of the foundation corporation, the establisher should write the articles of association. If the establisher does not define matters other than essential contents such as the objective of establishment and assets, they should be defined by the court through the filing of claims by interested parties, etc. Where the agency gives approval, the donated assets shall belong to the corporation. The donated asset by the will shall be retrospective to the effective time of such will, and shall belong to the corporation. Regarding the establishment of the foundation corporation, the two nations' laws have their respective characteristics in terms of structure and type, but they were found to be very similar in terms of contents. This understanding is justified by the fact that the drafter of the Japanese Civil Law much referred to the German Civil Law, especially, the first draft. Under South Korea's Civil Law, regulations on the establishment of a corporation were enacted based on the old civil law Japanese Civil Law, but many differences are shown in the actual corporation establishment course such as the method of distinguishing profit from non-profit, conversion into registration establishment requirements, and the method of changing the foundation corporation's articles of association. These changes reflected the then domestic and overseas civil law science evaluation after the implementation of the Civil Japanese Law, a step forward. As such, under the civil laws of Germany, Japan and South Korea, their respective corporation systems retain their independence and yet are closely related to one another, and with this understanding, the future changes, especially, recent discussions on the amendment of South Korea's Corporation Act draw more attention.

Abstract

Recently, there is a growing interest in foundation corporations, and legislative research and discussions on this field are actively progressing. In this course, the current legal system and content should be first identified. Foundations have long historical roots. The foundation corporation that we today perceive in the legal sense - namely, the foundation corporation as a legal entity with authority and power - is the product of the 19th century western law science. The German Civil Law faithfully reflected this concept, strictly distinguished between the corporation and the foundation corporation and differently specified the conditions for the establishment of both entities. The German Civil Law, when enacted, required the competent agency's approval for the establishment thereof and other requirements. Written methods were required, the establisher's right to withdraw was guaranteed and when the establishment was approved by the agency, invested assets were required to be transferred to the entity. In the case of the act of establishment associated with disposition by death, the approval application method by the heir apparent, etc. was specified. The ownership of invested assets is retrospectively returned to prior to the commencement of inheritance. Meanwhile, the Japanese Civil Law unified the establishment conditions of the corporate association and the foundation corporation, required both entities to obtain the approval of the competent agency, and provided that in the case of the foundation corporation, the establisher should write the articles of association. If the establisher does not define matters other than essential contents such as the objective of establishment and assets, they should be defined by the court through the filing of claims by interested parties, etc. Where the agency gives approval, the donated assets shall belong to the corporation. The donated asset by the will shall be retrospective to the effective time of such will, and shall belong to the corporation. Regarding the establishment of the foundation corporation, the two nations' laws have their respective characteristics in terms of structure and type, but they were found to be very similar in terms of contents. This understanding is justified by the fact that the drafter of the Japanese Civil Law much referred to the German Civil Law, especially, the first draft. Under South Korea's Civil Law, regulations on the establishment of a corporation were enacted based on the old civil law Japanese Civil Law, but many differences are shown in the actual corporation establishment course such as the method of distinguishing profit from non-profit, conversion into registration establishment requirements, and the method of changing the foundation corporation's articles of association. These changes reflected the then domestic and overseas civil law science evaluation after the implementation of the Civil Japanese Law, a step forward. As such, under the civil laws of Germany, Japan and South Korea, their respective corporation systems retain their independence and yet are closely related to one another, and with this understanding, the future changes, especially, recent discussions on the amendment of South Korea's Corporation Act draw more attention.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 고상현, "재단법인설립행위의 개념, 구조, 법적 성질", 민사법학, 50, pp.277~308 (2010), 한국민사법학회
  2. 권철, "日本의 새로운 非營利法人제도에 관한 小考- 최근 10년간의 動向과 新法의 소개 -", 비교사법, 14(4), pp.117~171 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  3. 권철, "민법의 관점에서 바라본 민법 개정안의 법인제도 - 비영리단체ㆍ법인 제도의 바람직한 상에 대한 각서 -", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.37~71 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  4. 김대정, "民法改正試案에서의 法人設立에 관한 立法主義의 轉換", 法學論文集, 34(2), pp.5~38 (2010), 법학연구원
  5. 김진우, "비영리법인의 설립에 있어 허가주의에 관한 연혁적 고찰", 인권과 정의, (383), pp.94~113 (2008), 대한변호사협회
  6. 남효순, "프랑스법인론", 서울대학교 법학, 40(3) (1999), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  7. 양창수, "민법연구(1)", 박영사 (1991)
  8. 여하윤, "프랑스 민법상의 법인론 - 비영리법인에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 15(4), pp.101~127 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  9. 윤태영, "일본 메이지민법(총칙편: 법인)의 입법이유 분석", 민사법학, 54(1), pp.323~361 (2011), 한국민사법학회
  10. 관습조사보고서, "정긍식", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2000)
  11. 정종휴, "주석민법(총칙(1)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
  12. 민의원법제사법위원회민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록", 상 (1957)
  13. 민사법연구회, "민법안의견서" (1957), 일조각
  14. 廣中俊雄, "民法修正案(前三編)の理由書", 有斐閣 (1987)
  15. 下井陸史, "註釋民法, 總則(2)" (1991), 有斐閣
  16. Bruck, F. Eberhard, "Über römisches Recht. Im Rahmen der Kulturgeschichte" (1954), Bruck
  17. v. Campenhausen, "Geschichte des Stiftungswesens, In Handbuch Stiftungen: Ziele - Projekte - Management - Rechtliche Gestaltung", pp.23~ (1998), Handbuch Stiftungen
  18. Coing, Helmut, "Europäisches Privatrecht, In Älteres Gemeines Recht (1500 bis1800)" (1985)
  19. Heise, Arnold, "Grundriss eines Systems des Gemeinen Civilrechts zum Behuf von Pandecten-Vorlesungen, Nachdr. der 3. Aufl" (1989), Heise
  20. Laum, Bernhard, "Stiftungen in der griechischen und römischen Antike, Bd. 1" (1914), Laum
  21. Liermann, Hans, "Handbuch des Stiftungsrechts, 2. Aufl" (2002), Liermann
  22. Mühlenbruch, Christian Friedrich, "Rechtliche Beurtheilung des Städelschen Beerbungsfalles" (1828), Mühlenbruch
  23. "Motive zu dem Entwurfe eines Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches für das Deutsche Reich, Bd. I", Leipzig (1888)
  24. Pleimes, Dieter, "Weltliches Stiftungsrecht. Geschichte der Rechtsformen, Forschungen zum deutschen Recht. Bd. 3", pp.136~ (1938), Pleimes
  25. "Protokolle der Kommission für die zweite Lesung des Entwurfs des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches, Bd. Ⅰ", Allgemeiner Teil (1899)
  26. Reicke, Siegfried, "Stiftungsbegriff und Stiftungsrecht im Mittelalter, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung. Bd. 53", pp.247~ (1933), Reicke
  27. Roth, Paul, "Ueber Stiftungen, Iherings Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts, Bd. 1", pp.189~ (1857), Jahrbücher für Dogmatik
  28. v. Savigny, "System des heutigen römischen Rechts, Bd. 2" (1840), System II
  29. Schubert, Werner, "Die Vorlagen der Redaktoren für die erste Kommission zur Ausarbeitung des Entwurfs eines Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches, Allgemeiner Teil" (1981)
  30. Schubert, Werner, "Die Vorlagen der Redaktoren für die erste Kommission zur Ausarbeitung des Entwurfs eines Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches, Erbrecht. Teil 1. Nachdr. d. Ausg. aus. d. Jahren 1876 – 1887, Berlin, New York 1984", ~ (1984)
  31. Schulze, Rainer, "Stiftungsrecht, In Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte" (1980), HRG

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)