본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정신적으로 제약이 있는 자의 자기결정권 보호를 위한 법제

Legislation for the Protection of the Mentally Incompetent’s Right to Self-determination

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The term “the mentally incompetent” in Korean legal system, refers to persons categorized as “mentally ill person” by Mental Health Act or “person with mental disability” by Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities. The mentally incompetent may be restrained of personal liberty due to certain reasons such as involuntary hospitalization or protected by Framework Act on Social Security. The mentally incompetent may also be subject to social exclusion as well as receiving assessment on the degree of his/her risk in causing harm to himself/herself or others. Although psychiatrists are given a relatively high degree of discretion over assessment of mental capacity of the mentally incompetent, doctor’s discretion may also be restricted by patients exercising their rights to self-determination and the practice of informed consent process. The assessment of the mentally incompetent’s mental capacity is used as a basis for making decisions on whether the patient has the capacity to consent to treatment, and whether to allow restricting his/her right to self-determination. The assessment should cover medical standards of the necessity for treatment, the point of assessment, and continuity of the patient’s mental capacity. Informed consent should be secured in each process of medical practice including closed ward admission based on the conclusion of the mental capacity assessment. This dissertation examines the requirements of due process in Mental Health Act with regards to securing the right to self-determination of the mentally incompetent, and Adult Guardianship System in the revised Civil Code. The study then deals with the problems and issues to be taken into consideration in applying the systems mentioned above.

Abstract

The term “the mentally incompetent” in Korean legal system, refers to persons categorized as “mentally ill person” by Mental Health Act or “person with mental disability” by Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities. The mentally incompetent may be restrained of personal liberty due to certain reasons such as involuntary hospitalization or protected by Framework Act on Social Security. The mentally incompetent may also be subject to social exclusion as well as receiving assessment on the degree of his/her risk in causing harm to himself/herself or others. Although psychiatrists are given a relatively high degree of discretion over assessment of mental capacity of the mentally incompetent, doctor’s discretion may also be restricted by patients exercising their rights to self-determination and the practice of informed consent process. The assessment of the mentally incompetent’s mental capacity is used as a basis for making decisions on whether the patient has the capacity to consent to treatment, and whether to allow restricting his/her right to self-determination. The assessment should cover medical standards of the necessity for treatment, the point of assessment, and continuity of the patient’s mental capacity. Informed consent should be secured in each process of medical practice including closed ward admission based on the conclusion of the mental capacity assessment. This dissertation examines the requirements of due process in Mental Health Act with regards to securing the right to self-determination of the mentally incompetent, and Adult Guardianship System in the revised Civil Code. The study then deals with the problems and issues to be taken into consideration in applying the systems mentioned above.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구, (20), pp.161~179 (2005), 한국법학회
  2. 김주현, "성년후견제도의 자기결정존중 원리를 중심으로 본 고령자 권리", 법학논총, 36(1), pp.547~575 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  3. 김천수, "成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.1~30 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  4. 김천수, "의료행위에 대한 동의능력과 동의권자", 민사법학, (13) (1996)
  5. 박태신, "정신장애인의 자기결정권과 행위능력 -일본의 성년후견제도를 중심으로 -", 안암법학, (27), pp.133~183 (2008), 안암법학회
  6. 서동우, "정신보건의 역사적 변화선상에서 본 우리나라 정신보건법의 문제와 개선안", 보건복지포럼, (123) (2007), 한국보건사회연구원
  7. 경험논문 : 정신장애인의 치료동의능력 평가 도구 개발:신뢰도와 타당화, "서미경", ~
  8. 신권철, "정신질환자 개념의 규범적 고찰", 법조, 59(5), pp.35~76 (2010), 법조협회
  9. 신은주, "정신질환자의 강제입원제도에 대한 문제점과 그 개선방안", 한국의료법학회지, 17(1), pp.21~48 (2009), 한국의료법학회
  10. 오호철, "일본의 성년후견제도상 의료행위의 동의", 법학연구, (39), pp.85~108 (2010), 한국법학회
  11. 우주형, "장애성년후견제도 도입에 관한 소고", 중앙법학, 10(4), pp.201~244 (2008), 중앙법학회
  12. 이덕환, "의료행위와 법" (2006), 현문사
  13. 이득환, "성년후견제도에 대한 각국의 입법과 우리나라의 그에 대한 민법개정에서의 시사점", 법학논총, 26(4), pp.373~393 (2009), 법학연구소
  14. 이재경, "정신질환자의 비자발적 입원에 관한 비교법적 검토 - 독일법을 중심으로 -", 의료법학, 10(2), pp.183~201 (2009), 대한의료법학회
  15. 정신질환자의 범죄성에 관한 연구, "장동원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1991)
  16. 정규원, "정신질환자의 비자의입원에 대한 검토", 법학논총, 25(4), pp.87~103 (2008), 법학연구소
  17. 정인원, "정신보건시설 재원자 및 시설 실태조사", 정신장애인 인권실태조사 결과발표 및 토론회 자료집 (2008)
  18. 정현미, "의료형법" (2007), 세창출판사
  19. 최문기, "성년후견제도의 입법론에 관한 일고찰", 경성법학, pp.16~12 (2007)
  20. 최행식, "醫師의 說明義務와 患者의 自己決定權", 법학연구, (17), pp.341~363 (2004), 한국법학회
  21. 최현태, "自己決定能力障碍者 保護를 위한 成年後見制度에 대한 立法論的 考察", 법학연구, (39), pp.135~154 (2010), 한국법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)