본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정신보건법의 입퇴원 규정 및 관련법 고찰

Review of Articles on Psychiatric Hospitalization in Mental Health Act

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

The Mental Health Act is an initiative aimed at changing and shaping mental health services and protecting human rights of persons with mental disorders. Since its legislation in 1995, four amendments have been made to the Act according to issues related to public concerns. Despite this Act,debate remains surrounding the human rights protection of the mentally ill. Further, Supreme Court precedents have been set related to the Mental Health Act. This study aimed to provide information regarding hospitalization procedures in the Mental Health Act with some lawsuits. Although annual numbers of patients involuntarily hospitalized have not been reported, it has been estimated that a small percentage of these individuals have are given review relating to the appropriateness of their hospitalization. The conditions set forth regarding involuntary admission in the Korean Mental Health Act are so inclusive and obscure that courts have had to request more evidence related to the inevitability of hospitalization in ensuing lawsuits. Involuntary hospitalizations in Korea are regarded as private contracts between hospitals and the family of mentally ill patients. Therefore, it is critical when patients are involuntarily hospitalized under the Mental Health Act, that others are not punished for illegal detention. Since the Protection of Personal Liberty Act took effect in 2009, most related lawsuits have been in regard to hospitalized patients in psychiatric facilities. Balancing the right to be treated and the right to refuse treatment is complex and intricate. More resources need to put into mental health to improve the protection of human rights in mentally ill patients in Korea.

Abstract

The Mental Health Act is an initiative aimed at changing and shaping mental health services and protecting human rights of persons with mental disorders. Since its legislation in 1995, four amendments have been made to the Act according to issues related to public concerns. Despite this Act,debate remains surrounding the human rights protection of the mentally ill. Further, Supreme Court precedents have been set related to the Mental Health Act. This study aimed to provide information regarding hospitalization procedures in the Mental Health Act with some lawsuits. Although annual numbers of patients involuntarily hospitalized have not been reported, it has been estimated that a small percentage of these individuals have are given review relating to the appropriateness of their hospitalization. The conditions set forth regarding involuntary admission in the Korean Mental Health Act are so inclusive and obscure that courts have had to request more evidence related to the inevitability of hospitalization in ensuing lawsuits. Involuntary hospitalizations in Korea are regarded as private contracts between hospitals and the family of mentally ill patients. Therefore, it is critical when patients are involuntarily hospitalized under the Mental Health Act, that others are not punished for illegal detention. Since the Protection of Personal Liberty Act took effect in 2009, most related lawsuits have been in regard to hospitalized patients in psychiatric facilities. Balancing the right to be treated and the right to refuse treatment is complex and intricate. More resources need to put into mental health to improve the protection of human rights in mentally ill patients in Korea.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Boerma B, "One year of the Act: a tribunal view of the first twelve months of the NSW Mental Health Act 1990", Aust Health Rev, 15, pp.435~448 (1992)
  2. Jang YM, "A study on the commitment of the mentally III", Kor Inst Crim Justice Policy, pp.1~141 (1995)
  3. Ovadia T, "Steps on the road to a national mental health policy", Ment Health Rev, pp.1~30 (1991)
  4. "WHO Web-site"[URL]
  5. "Ministry of Government Legislation; c1997-2007"[URL]
  6. Hong JP, "Basic statistics on psychiatric hospitalization based on Medical Insurance", ~
  7. Hong JP, "Report on petition for renewal of hospitalization to Seoul Mental Health Review Board in 2008", pp.1~20 (2009), Seoul Mental Health Review Board
  8. "대법원 판결문 선고 2009. 선고 2007도5383 폭력행위등처벌에 관한법률위반 (야간·공동감금) 사건", ~ (2009)
  9. UN General Assembly, "Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care", ~ (1991)
  10. 중앙정신보건사업지원단 보건복지부, "2008년 중앙정신보건사업지원단 사업보고서", ~
  11. 홍진표, "정신보건법의 주요 쟁점 조항에 대한 선진국과의 사례 비교", 신경정신의학, 48(2), pp.92~101 (2009), 대한신경정신의학회
  12. 이명수, "정신보건심판위원회 퇴원명령 대상자 추적조사", 신경정신의학, 48(1), pp.42~47 (2009), 대한신경정신의학회
  13. "법원행정처 사법정책실의‘ 인신보호사건 접수·진행 현황’ 및 법원통계월보. 2009. 9. 7", ~ (2009)
  14. 신권철, "인신보호사건의 실무운영 및 쟁점. 인신보호재판장 간담회 회의자료", ~ (2009)
  15. "인신보호법 제12조 제2항", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)