본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정신장애인의 자기결정권과 행위능력 -일본의 성년후견제도를 중심으로 -

The self-determination and capacity of the insane person

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Nowadays discussion on human rights are focused on the infringement of human rights of the weak by the socially strong persons and social discrimination. Also, the trend of understanding the human rights as the self-realization is getting stronger. Therefore, the concept of the self-determination right and the self-expression right has come to bear a very significant meaning, and in fact it is keenly needed for the disabled, females, foreign immigrants, HIV-positive persons, etc. to overcome social discrimination and human rights infringement and to promote self-realization while making themselves stay in a clear position. Therefore, new legal structures have emerged in various types according to the new ways of thinking about the human rights in such circumstances, and thus it may be said that the relationship between the self-determination right and the legal capacity system of the mentally disabled persons belongs to a very significant subject. Particularly in such a system of making massive production of the uniform and legally incompetent persons like ours, it becomes inevitable to have a large number of subjects that are to be discussed more in the systematic and ideological dimension. Therefore, as a premise for understanding the realities of the Korean system for the legally incompetent persons, the author has conducted a study specifically on the Japanese adult guardship system which makes it possible to take flexible as well as elastic measures in compliance with the degree of everyone's diversified power of judgment and necessity for protection in order to make the ideology of "respect for sekf-decision" harmonized with the ideology of "protection of oneself" among examples of legislation in foreign countries, and has prepared this writing so that a constant direction may be presented in order to realize the constitutional ideology of human dignity when our civil law will be amended in the future. In other words, as the system for the legally incompetent persons is based upon the modern thought of the 19th century, it has inherently apprehensions of consequently being contrary to the constitutional ideology of a welfare state, so to speak, unconstitutional traits without being conforming to modern legal sense and it has the problem of being a system with too much emphasis on property management rather than on inheritor protection and physical custody. Therefore, it is emphasized that the enactment of the adult guardship law of a new type in consideration of the protection of the disabled of socially weak persons together with completing throughly of the respect for self-determination right, ideology of generalization and respect for survival ability as seen to be the most important ideologies in the modern society while recognizing the problems of the current-effective system for the legally incompetent persons by changing the basic ideological foundation which is existing in the system for the legally incompetent persons, and through doing this, a systematic foundation to protect the disabled of the insufficient ability of judgment is to be set up, and thus ① it is to become an easy system for people's use in order to promote social welfare fully for the intellectually or mentally disabled persons, ② a system conforming to the Korean economic, cultural and social environment is to be induced through a comparative review while recognizing the presence of the problem of low-level utilization because the currently effective system for the disabled persons is a system that is equally depriving the legal capacity, ③ efforts will have to be made to improve the method of public notices, etc. because, notwithstanding the concerned person, all the family members will not like the current system where all sentenced facts are being publically noticed by making them recorded in the family register.

Abstract

Nowadays discussion on human rights are focused on the infringement of human rights of the weak by the socially strong persons and social discrimination. Also, the trend of understanding the human rights as the self-realization is getting stronger. Therefore, the concept of the self-determination right and the self-expression right has come to bear a very significant meaning, and in fact it is keenly needed for the disabled, females, foreign immigrants, HIV-positive persons, etc. to overcome social discrimination and human rights infringement and to promote self-realization while making themselves stay in a clear position. Therefore, new legal structures have emerged in various types according to the new ways of thinking about the human rights in such circumstances, and thus it may be said that the relationship between the self-determination right and the legal capacity system of the mentally disabled persons belongs to a very significant subject. Particularly in such a system of making massive production of the uniform and legally incompetent persons like ours, it becomes inevitable to have a large number of subjects that are to be discussed more in the systematic and ideological dimension. Therefore, as a premise for understanding the realities of the Korean system for the legally incompetent persons, the author has conducted a study specifically on the Japanese adult guardship system which makes it possible to take flexible as well as elastic measures in compliance with the degree of everyone's diversified power of judgment and necessity for protection in order to make the ideology of "respect for sekf-decision" harmonized with the ideology of "protection of oneself" among examples of legislation in foreign countries, and has prepared this writing so that a constant direction may be presented in order to realize the constitutional ideology of human dignity when our civil law will be amended in the future. In other words, as the system for the legally incompetent persons is based upon the modern thought of the 19th century, it has inherently apprehensions of consequently being contrary to the constitutional ideology of a welfare state, so to speak, unconstitutional traits without being conforming to modern legal sense and it has the problem of being a system with too much emphasis on property management rather than on inheritor protection and physical custody. Therefore, it is emphasized that the enactment of the adult guardship law of a new type in consideration of the protection of the disabled of socially weak persons together with completing throughly of the respect for self-determination right, ideology of generalization and respect for survival ability as seen to be the most important ideologies in the modern society while recognizing the problems of the current-effective system for the legally incompetent persons by changing the basic ideological foundation which is existing in the system for the legally incompetent persons, and through doing this, a systematic foundation to protect the disabled of the insufficient ability of judgment is to be set up, and thus ① it is to become an easy system for people's use in order to promote social welfare fully for the intellectually or mentally disabled persons, ② a system conforming to the Korean economic, cultural and social environment is to be induced through a comparative review while recognizing the presence of the problem of low-level utilization because the currently effective system for the disabled persons is a system that is equally depriving the legal capacity, ③ efforts will have to be made to improve the method of public notices, etc. because, notwithstanding the concerned person, all the family members will not like the current system where all sentenced facts are being publically noticed by making them recorded in the family register.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 江橋 崇, "自己決定權を支える人權行政 in 自己決定權と法(岩波講座 現代の法 14)" (1998), 岩波書店
  2. 緖方直人, "民法總則" (2007), 嵯峨野書院
  3. 山本敬三, "民法講義Ⅰ 總則" (2005), 有斐閣
  4. 四宮和夫, "民法總則" (2005), 弘文堂
  5. 川井健, "民法槪論" (2005), 有斐閣
  6. 平野裕之, "民法總則" (2006), 日本評論社
  7. 松本博之, "現代社會と自己決定權", 日獨シンポジウム (1997), 信山社
  8. 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구, 20 (2005), 한국법학회
  9. 송호열, "고령자의 후견제도와 자기결정권", 가족법연구, 18(2) (2004), 한국가족법학회
  10. 김일환, "행정정보의 공동이용으로부터 정보자기결정권의 보호에 관한 헌법상 고찰", 공법연구, 32(4) (2004), 한국공법학회
  11. 백윤철, "헌법상 자기결정권과 개인정보자기결정권", 헌법학연구, 9(3) (2003), 한국헌법학회
  12. 강수경, "어린이와 헌법상 자기결정권", 사회과학연구, 12 (2007), 덕성여자대학교사회과학연구소
  13. 송호열, "고령자의 후견제도와 자기결정권", 가족법연구, 18(2) (2004), 한국가족법학회
  14. 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구 (2005), 한국법학회
  15. 강수경, "어린이와 헌법상 자기결정권", 사회과학연구, 12 (2007), 성여자대학교사회과학연구소
  16. 유경미, "성년후견제도의 입법화를 위한 고찰", 법학연구, 24 (2006), 한국법학회
  17. 이은영, "성년후견제도에 관한 입법제안", 한일법학, 20 (2001), 한일법학회
  18. 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향", 민사법학, (18) (2000), 한국민사법학회
  19. 한형수, "특집 : 도시화와 고령화 ; 고령화에 따른 사회변동의 의미와 과제, 대한지방행정공제회", ~ (2005)
  20. 內野正幸, "自己決定權と平等 in 自己決定權と法(岩波講座 現代の法 14)" (1998), 岩波書店
  21. 最高裁判所事務總局家庭局, "成年後見關係事件の槪況", 家庭月報, 59(9) (2001)
  22. [URL]
  23. [URL]
  24. [URL]
  25. [URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)