본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동업기업의 현물자산과 양도소득

Investment in Kind Asset and Transfer Income of the Partnership Taxation System

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Partnership Taxation System has been taken effect on January 1st, 2009. It is more advanced than the Joint Enterprise Taxation System in the respect that the application of the law has been extended. The Joint Enterprise Taxation System has been applied only to the Joint Enterprises between the individuals, but in comparison to the Joint Enterprise Taxation System, the Partnership Taxation System can be applied to the Joint Enterprises between the residents, non-residents, domestic corporations, and foreign corporations. However, it has the potential to become a very complicated law because the income distributed to the residents and non-residents are subject to the income tax, while the income distributed to the domestic corporations and foreign corporations are subject to the corporation tax. Because it is a law which is enacted recently, there is no knowing if it is legislated based on the conciseness of the law. However, although it had been discussed a lot about the problems caused by the inadequacy of the Joint Enterprise Taxation System, the Partnership Taxation System also has inadequate regulations about that problems. For this reason, it has a possibility of falling into confusion. For example, there is a regulation about the assignment income in the Partnership Taxation System. It is applied when an investor invests actual things(goods)-which is subject to the capital gains tax-in a partnership. Although the investments in kind are subject to the capital gains tax, it is very obscure to see it as the capital gains because of the vague regulation, especially in many cases which are mentioned below. The investments in kind are sometimes transferred to the third party, returned in cash or in kind to the investor, or returned in the residual property caused by the withdrawer from the partnership. Also, sometimes the shares of the partners which have withdrawn are returned to the partnership or transferred to another partner. As noticed, the regulation concerning the investments in kind which is subject to the capital gains tax is very ambiguous in the current Partnership Taxation System. Therefore, I wish we could legislate the clear regulations about it.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2005), 박영사
  2. 국세청, "동업기업 과세특례의 이해" (2009), 국세청
  3. 국중호, "주요국의 조세제도-일본편" (2004), 한국조세연구원
  4. 김유찬, "주요국의 조세제도-독일편" (2004), 한국조세연구원
  5. 김진수, "파트너십 과세제도에 관한 연구" (2000), 한국조세연구원
  6. 백운일, "공동사업 동업기업 세무실무" (2009), 영화조세람
  7. 안종석, "파트너십 과세제도 도입방안" (2007), 한국조세연구원
  8. 윤병철, "조합과세에 관한 판례연구" (2002), 조세법연구
  9. 이승문, "현행 파트너십과세제도의 개요와 약간의 문제점", 계간세무사, ~ (2009), 봄호
  10. 이승문, "현행 파트너시십과세제도의 개요와 약간의 문제점", 계간세무사, ~ (2009), 여름호
  11. 이은미, "조합의 과세에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  12. 이은미, "새로 도입된 파트너십 과세제도의 주요 내용과 문제점", 계간세무사, ~ (2008), 봄호
  13. 이준규, "법인세법" (2009), 세학사
  14. 이준규, "미국의 파트너십 과세제도" (2007), 한국조세연구원
  15. 이창희, "독일법상 인적회사와 조합의 과세", 조세학술논문집, 19 (2003)
  16. "파트너십 과세제도 도입방안, in: 정책토론회자료" (2007), 한국조세원구원
  17. Hoffman, Raabe, "Corporation, Partnership, Estates, and Trust" (2003), Thomson Company
  18. Laura E. Cunningham, "The Logic of Subchapter K, st.paul", ~ (2000), minn
  19. 金子宏, "租稅法" (2006), 弘文堂
  20. 內田貴, "民法Ⅰ" (2001), 東京大學出版會
  21. 內田貴, "民法Ⅱ" (2001), 東京大學出版會
  22. 增井良啓, "組合形式の投資媒體と所得課稅", 稅務硏究會 論文集, 44 (1999)
  23. 增井良啓, "組合損益の出資者への歸屬", 稅務事例硏究, (49) (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)