동업기업 과세제도의 부채 관련 규정의 개선방안 연구
Research on Liabilities Provisions in the Partnership Taxation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As current partnerhip taxation in Korea does not have the liabilities provisions, it does not adjust each partner’s basis in proportionate to the change in liabilities of partnership. Consequnetly, “inside basis”, the assets value of partnership, becomes unequal to “outside basis”, stakes of partners, and, as a result, the change in basis can not be accurately analysed. Although such inequality results from focus on the simplification of partnership taxation, resulting conceptual incompleteness should be treated with the liabilities provision in the partnership taxation in the U.S. Therefore, as it does in the partnership taxation in the U.S., partnership taxation in Korea should apply the liabilities provisions through contribution, basis adjustment and distribution. That is, the increase in partners’ responsibilites for partnership’s liabilities should be regarded as contribution, while the decrease in them should be regarded as distribution. The concept of “liabilities” is to be defined based on the cash basis, and only the recourse liability, which takes the “economic risk of loss”, should affect partners’ stakes in partneship.
Abstract
As current partnerhip taxation in Korea does not have the liabilities provisions, it does not adjust each partner’s basis in proportionate to the change in liabilities of partnership. Consequnetly, “inside basis”, the assets value of partnership, becomes unequal to “outside basis”, stakes of partners, and, as a result, the change in basis can not be accurately analysed. Although such inequality results from focus on the simplification of partnership taxation, resulting conceptual incompleteness should be treated with the liabilities provision in the partnership taxation in the U.S. Therefore, as it does in the partnership taxation in the U.S., partnership taxation in Korea should apply the liabilities provisions through contribution, basis adjustment and distribution. That is, the increase in partners’ responsibilites for partnership’s liabilities should be regarded as contribution, while the decrease in them should be regarded as distribution. The concept of “liabilities” is to be defined based on the cash basis, and only the recourse liability, which takes the “economic risk of loss”, should affect partners’ stakes in partneship.
참고문헌 (12)
- 권태윤, "동업기업과세특례제도 이용활성화방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 세무학, pp.2011
- 김도형, "동업기업 과세상의 실질적인 경제적 효과 테스트의 도입에 관한 연구", 조세연구, 12(3), pp.67~96 (2012), 한국조세연구포럼
- 김석환, "同業企業課稅制度상의 資本計定을 통한 다양한 損益配分比率 許容 與否에 대한 考察*-美國의 特別配分 制度에 대한 比較法的 檢討-", 세무학연구, 26(4), pp.243~267 (2009), 한국세무학회
- 김석환, "투시과세 제도에 대한 비교연구 : 미국 및 일본의 제도와의 비교를 중심으로", 박사, 세법, pp.2010
- 이정미, "미국 세법의 이해" (2011), 삼일인포마인
- 이준규, "동업기업 과세특례" (2010), (주)삼일인포마인
- 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구", 조세법연구, 14(1), pp.51~98 (2008), 한국세법학회
- 임동원, "동업기업과세제도에 대한 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2014
- IRS., "Publication 551. Basis of Assets", ~ (2011)
- IRS., "Publication 541. Partnerships", ~ (2013)
- IRS., "Publication 925. Passive Activity and At-Risk Rules", ~ (2013)
- McKee, W., "Federal Taxation of Partnerships and Partners" (1996), Warren, Gorhan and Lamont
