형법상 성적 자기결정권 개념에 대한 성찰
A Critical study on the concept of 'Sexual Self-Determination'
0
조회
0
다운로드
46
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The concept of 'Sexual Self-Determination' is not unfamiliar with the Criminal Law. However, The answer to the question, "what is sexual self- determination," is not easy and so this issue needs to be further discussed. This is why Sexual Self-Determination is gradually distorted, extended, or disregarded according to the speaker’s intention or other circumstances. Sexual Self-Determination has been usually discussed and advocated with Specific Crimes, etc., not with its nature, legal foundation, and development background. Now, the concept that the legal interest prohibiting sexual offences is considered, not a sense of virtue or sex liberation, but Sexual self-determination, is established, and thus there is necessity for a correct interpretation and understanding as to the element of sexual offense, and the relation between individual sexual offenses needs to be formed again. This paper focuses on the concept of sexual self-determination, the scope of such concept, and the issue of whether the understanding about sexual self-determination, which is the legal interest of sexual offense, is appropriate or valid. In addition, as one of the important matters, if its new reflection or comprehension need, this paper focuses on what should be done. For this, I studies the relation between sexual self-determination and constitutional self- determination, and reviews its character based on the dual structure of the sexual self- determination. Then, I inquiries about its main points and analyzes two sides of view, i.e., the freedom of decision-making and the protection of bodily harm. This paper looks into an offense subject to prosecution only on complaint from the victim and its contradiction. Lastly, This paper makes a comparative study concerning sexual offense and then, proposes its new concept.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강구진, "형법강의(각론Ⅰ)", pp.17~ (1983), 박영사
- 구병삭, "신헌법학원론", pp.532~ (1996), 박영사
- 권형준, "자기결정권에 관한 헌법재판소의 판례분석", 법학논총, 17, pp.66~67 (2000), 한양대
- 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구, (20), pp.161~179 (2005), 한국법학회
- 김홍우, "신체의 현상학과 정치학에 대한 그 함의-정화열 교수의 신체론과 관련하여", 사회비평, (17), pp.127~ (1997)
- 마이클 프리먼, "인권: 이론과 실천", pp.169~ (2006), 아르케
- 박혜진, "성매매특별법의 정당성과 형법정책", 박사, pp.2007
- 배종대, "형법각론", pp.179~ (2007), 홍문사
- 신상숙, "성폭력의 의미구성과 ‘성적 자기결정권’의 딜레마", 여성과 사회, (13), pp.34~ (2001), 창작과 비평사
- 정화열, "생태철학과 보살핌의 윤리", 녹색평론 (1996)
- 정희진, "성적 자기결정권을 넘어서-공간, 몸, 성폭력, in:섹슈얼리티 강의", pp.245~ (2006), 동녘
- 조르쥬 비가렐로, "강간의 역사", pp.63~68 (2002), 당대
- 김성언, "성폭력의 실태와 원인에 관한 연구(Ⅱ)", 한국형사정책연구원, 93~ (1998)
- 한인섭, "성폭력특별법과 피해자보호", 피해자학연구, (3), pp.38~ (1994)
- 토니 마이어스, "누가 슬라보예 지젝을 미워하는가", pp.165~ (2005), 도서출판 앨피
- 황태정, "형법상 승낙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- C. Habib, "Vertu dr femme?, La Pudeur, La Réserve et le Trouble, Autrement", 140~ (1992)
- Donnelly. J., "인권과 국제정치: 국제인권의 현실과 가능성 및 한계" (2006), 도서출판 오름
- E. Holzleithner, "Das Sexuelle im Recht: Zwischen Autonomie und Verdinglichung, in: Olympe. Feministische Arbeitshefte zur Politik. kreativ – skeptisch – innovativ. Frauen formen Recht", Heft 17, 2002, pp.48~
- K. H. Gössel, "Das neue Sxualstrafrecht-Eine systematische Darstellung für die Praxis", De Gruyter Recht, 11~ (2005)
- M. Pezet, "Journal officiel, Assemblée nationale, séqnce du", 3421~ (1991)
- Rudolphi, "Die verschiedenen Aspekte des Rechtsgutsbegriffs, in: Festschrift für Honig", 161~ (1970)
