보호법익 관점에서 행위양태 및 주체에 따른 주거침입죄 성부
A Study on Formation of Violation of Domicile Behavior Mode and the Main Body in the Benefit and Protection of the Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Violation of domicile is steadily swelling. Also it is a complex situation. This situations appear astonishing to a majority opinion that the court had made such a decision. Therefore it demand a fair decision of the judge. First problem, the existing regulations of housebreaking relation to the benefit and protection of the law. A personal opinion is protection of right in discrepancy in opinions. The law proved ineffective in dealing with the problem. Case as a substitute is not distinctly. There has been no judicial precedent for this kind of case as of yet distinctly. Second problem, a dwelling site is determination and intention of occupant of a house. Intention of occupant of a house relation to long term and persons interested in construction. It is very complex. Idea of an inhabitant is important. Third problem,communal inhabitant is agreement for intention. This is not accept in reality. this idea are out of touch with reality. Therefore agreement. of communal inhabitant is respective. Because several is indication of failure to come to an agreement. Forth problem, a consummated crime in violation of domicile is the terms desired. There are violation of entire bodily and section, part and parcel. My opinion do not accept rational argument. My opinion is to decide for protection of right. Violation of entire bodily is not a vital element of an attempted, committed crime and rational interpretation. This is purpose to protection of right and injury in people.
Abstract
Violation of domicile is steadily swelling. Also it is a complex situation. This situations appear astonishing to a majority opinion that the court had made such a decision. Therefore it demand a fair decision of the judge. First problem, the existing regulations of housebreaking relation to the benefit and protection of the law. A personal opinion is protection of right in discrepancy in opinions. The law proved ineffective in dealing with the problem. Case as a substitute is not distinctly. There has been no judicial precedent for this kind of case as of yet distinctly. Second problem, a dwelling site is determination and intention of occupant of a house. Intention of occupant of a house relation to long term and persons interested in construction. It is very complex. Idea of an inhabitant is important. Third problem,communal inhabitant is agreement for intention. This is not accept in reality. this idea are out of touch with reality. Therefore agreement. of communal inhabitant is respective. Because several is indication of failure to come to an agreement. Forth problem, a consummated crime in violation of domicile is the terms desired. There are violation of entire bodily and section, part and parcel. My opinion do not accept rational argument. My opinion is to decide for protection of right. Violation of entire bodily is not a vital element of an attempted, committed crime and rational interpretation. This is purpose to protection of right and injury in people.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김성천, "형법각론" (2006), 동현출판사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
- 손동권, "형법각론" (2007), 율곡출판사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2003), 법지사
- 조준현, "형법각론" (2005), 법원사
- 진계호, "형법각론" (2003), 대왕사
- "형사판례연구(1-15)" (2007), 박영사
- 김경락, "부재중인 거주자의 의사에 반하여 주거에 들어가는 행위에 대한 주거침입죄의 성립여부", 형사법연구, 22(3), pp.323~354 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 김대군, "주거권의 도덕적 토대에 관한 연구", 윤리연구, 1(81), pp.57~77 (2011), 한국윤리학회
- 김성돈, "주거침입죄의 주거개념과 기수시기", 형사법연구, 22(1), pp.45~70 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 비밀침해죄 및 주거침입죄 규정의 개정방안, "김재봉", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 김혁돈, "공동주택의 공용부분에 대한 주거침입죄의 성부", 법학연구, 18(2), pp.301~326 (2010), 법학연구소
- 류석준, "사용자에 대하여 정당한 노동쟁의에 있어 병존적 관리․사용자인 제3자에 대한 주거침입죄의 성부", 형사법연구, 22(3), pp.355~372 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 류전철, "주거침입죄의 해석론과 적용상의 문제점", 법학논총, 30(2), pp.81~108 (2010), 법학연구소
- 문채규, "주거침입죄의 보호법익 - ‘사실상 평온설’의 정립을 위하여 -", 비교형사법연구, 12(2), pp.49~74 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
- 송문호, "주거침입죄의 성립범위", 형사정책연구, 20(3), pp.301~321 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 임상규, "주거침입죄에 관한 대법원의 주요판례와 그 해석 및 입법론적 보완책", 법학논고, (34), pp.337~360 (2010), 법학연구원
- 최선호, "주거침입죄에 관한 소고", 법학연구, (29), pp.289~310 (2008), 한국법학회
- 하태훈, "승낙의 의사표시의 흠결과 주거침입죄의 성부", 형사판례연구, (6) (1997)
- Jescheck, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, AT, 5. Aufl" (1996)
- Kühl, Kristian, "Strafrecht, AT, 3. Aufl" (2000)
- Maurach, Reinhart, "Deutsches Strafrecht, AT, 4. Aufl." (1971)
- Naucke, Wolfgang, "Strafrecht, Eine Einführung, 9. Aufl" (2000)
- Schönke, Adolf, "Strafrechtgesetzbuch, Kommentar, 26. Aufl. 2001. Strantenwerth, Günter, Strafrecht, AT, 1, 4. Aufl." (2000)