본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동일 어종(갈치, 참조기) 어획에 대한 다수 어업별 온실가스 배출량 정량적 분석

A quantitative analysis of greenhouse gases emissions by multiple fisheries for catching the same species (hairtail and small yellow croaker)

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류수산학

초록

전세계적으로 온실가스 배출에 대한 관심이 높게 증가하고 있다. 수산업 분야에서는 2015는 파리기후변화협약으로 인하여 온실가스 배출이 매우 중요한 이슈이다. 한국정부는 2020년까지 수산분야에서 BAU대비 4.8%의 온실가스 배출을 감소시킬 계획을 가지고 있다. 더나아가, 한국정부는 2021년 기후적응서밋에서 2050년 탄소중립을 달성하겠다고 선언하였다. 그러나, 한국 수산분야의 온실가스배출 연구는 광범위하게 수행되지 않았다. 한국 수산업으로부터 배출되는 온실가스량에 관한 지금까지의 연구는 주로 업종별 배출량에 관하여 진행되어 있다. 그러나 수산업으로 배출되는 온실가스량에 관한 앞으로의 연구는 탄소표지제 도입을 대비하기 위하여 어종별 탄소배출량을 수행할 필요가 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 다양한 업종으로부터 어종(갈치, 참조기)을 생산하는데 배출되는 온실가스량을 분석하고자한다. 본 연구에서는 다양한 업종으로부터 어획되는 어종(갈치, 참조기)을 생산하는데 배출되는 온실가스량을 전과정평가에 의하여 분석하였으며, 전과정평가를 위하여 각 프로세스 단계를 위한 입력요소와 시스템경계를 정의하였다. 온실가스배출량은 어획활동에 의한 부분만 다루었다. 더 나아가 어종별 단위생산 및 어종 연간생산량에 의하여 배출되는 온실가스량을 다양한 업종별로 분석하였다. 본 결과는 한국 수산업으로부터 배출되는 온실가스 상황을 이해하는데 도움을 줄 수 잇을 것으로 판단된다.

Abstract

The concern on the greenhouse gas emission is strongly increasing globally. In fishery industry section, the greenhouse gas emissions are an important issue according to The Paris Climate Change Accord in 2015. The Korean government has a plan to reduce the GHG emissions as 4.8% compared to the BAU in fisheries until 2020. Furthermore, the Korean government has also declared to achieve the carbon neutrality in 2050 at the Climate Adaptation Summit 2021. However, the investigation on the GHG emissions from Korean fisheries did not carry out extensively. Most studies on GHG emissions from Korean fishery have dealt with the GHG emissions by fishery classification so far. However, follow-up studies related to GHG emissions from fisheries need to evaluate the GHG emission level by species to prepare the adoption of environmental labels and declarations (ISO 14020). The purpose of this research is to investigate which degree of GHG emitted to produce the species (hairtail and small yellow croaker) from various fisheries. Here, we calculated the GHG emission to produce the species from the fisheries using the Life Cycle Assessment method. The system boundary and input parameters for each process level are defined for the LCA analysis. The fuel use coefficients of the fisheries for the species are also calculated according to the fuel type. The GHG emissions from sea activities by the fisheries will be dealt with. Furthermore, the GHG emissions for producing the unit weight species and annual production are calculated by fishery classification. The results will be helpful to understand the circumstances of GHG emissions from Korean fisheries.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Aanondsen SA, "Life cycle assessments of environmental performance used as a tool in ship design(In Norwegian : Livsløpsanalyser for beregning av miljøpåvirkning brukt som verktøy ved prosjektering av skip)", M. Sc., Department of Marine Technology, pp.1997
  2. 배재현, "주요 근해어업의 온실가스 배출량 정량적 분석", 수산해양기술연구, 55(1), pp.050~061 (2019), 한국수산해양기술학회[DOI]
  3. A study on the development of air pollutants and greenhouse gases emission factor and emission estimation from the domestic costal shipping(Ⅲ), "Choi SJ", National Institute of Environmental Research R&D, 1~127 (2016)
  4. Curtis HC, "Options for improving fuel efficiency in the UK fishing fleet", Sea Fish Industry Authority & European Community, pp.1~48 (2006)
  5. H. Ellingsen, "Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry—A preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon", Marine Policy, 33(3), pp.479~488 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Almudena Hospido, "Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries", Fisheries Research, 76(2), pp.174~186 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. "KFIP" (2020)[URL]
  8. Kim SH, "A study on Methodology and application of the Life Cycle Assessment", J Korea Soc Waste Manag, 12, pp.145~152 (1995)
  9. 김현영, "전과정평가방법에 의한 주요 연안어업의 온실가스 배출량 정량적 분석", 수산해양기술연구, 53(1), pp.77~88 (2017), 한국수산해양기술학회[DOI]
  10. Lee CW, "Research of Low-carbon emission marine production technology", Land Transport and Maritime R&D Report, pp.1~573 (2010)
  11. 이지훈, "전과정 평가 방법에 의한 한국 대형선망의 온실가스 배출량 정량적 분석", 수산해양기술연구, 49(3), pp.282~290 (2013), 한국수산해양기술학회[DOI]
  12. Jihoon Lee, "Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emission of Korean Offshore Fisheries", Journal of Ocean University of China, 17(3), pp.675~682 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  13. 이지훈, "수치해석기법에 의한 어구 저항 분석 및 저탄소 트롤어구 설계와 비용 분석", 수산해양기술연구, 46(4), pp.313~323 (2010), 한국수산해양기술학회
  14. 이동우, "한국 수산업분야 어업용 연소연료의 사용실태와 CO2배출량의 산정", 한국수산과학회지, 43(1), pp.78~82 (2010), 한국수산과학회
  15. 이지훈, "전과정 평가에 의한 한국 근해 대형어업의 온실가스 배출량 분석", 한국수산과학회지, 44(4), pp.383~389 (2011), 한국수산과학회
  16. 이지훈, "전과정평가 방법에 의한 외끌이 대형기선저인망 어업의 온실 가스 배출량의 정량적 분석", 한국수산과학회지, 48(2), pp.200~206 (2015), 한국수산과학회
  17. Jihoon Lee, "Development of a low-energy midwater trawl with different combinations of trawl nets and trawl doors through model experiments", Fisheries Science, 84(2), pp.323~334 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  18. Park KH, "Development of Triple Bottom Line integrated model for environmental, economic and social evaluation of construction project", Ph. D., Department of environmental engineering, pp.2004
  19. N. Pelletier, "Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better?", Aquaculture, 272(1-4), pp.399~416 (2007), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Prior D, "Optimisation of Trawl Energy Efficiency under Fishing Effort Constraint", Proc. Of the 9th International Workshop “DEMaT09”, pp.163~176 (2009)
  21. Erwin M. Schau, "Energy consumption in the Norwegian fisheries", Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(3), pp.325~334 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Energy efficient fishing: A 2006 review - Part A - Alternative fuels and efficient engines, "Sterling D", Australian Government - Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, 1~52 (2007)
  23. Energy efficient fishing: A 2006 review - Part B - Hull characteristics and efficiency, "Sterling D", Australian Government - Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, 1~27 (2007)
  24. "The World counts" (2021)[URL]
  25. Thrane M, "Environmental impacts from Danish fish products-Hot spots and environmental policies", Ph. D., Department of Development and Planning, pp.2004
  26. Mikkel Thrane, "Energy Consumption in the Danish Fishery: Identification of Key Factors", Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1-2), pp.223~239 (2004), Wiley[DOI]
  27. Energy consumed by North Atlantic fisheries. Fisheries Centre Research Report, Fisheries impacts on North Atlantic ecosystems: catch, effort and national, "regional datasets", Tyedmers P, 2001, pp.12~34
  28. "Union of Concerned Scientists" (2021)[URL]
  29. Carbon footprint and energy use of Norwegian seafood products, "Winther U", SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, 1~89 (2009)
  30. Friederike Ziegler, "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Seafood Products from Capture Fisheries", The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12(1), pp.61~61 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  31. Life Cycle Assessment of southern pink shrimp products from SENEGAL: An environmental comparison between artisanal fisheries in the Casamance region and a trawl fishery based in Dakar, "Ziegler F", FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular, 1~32, pp.FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1044 (2009)
  32. Friederike Ziegler, "Emissions from fuel combustion in Swedish cod fishery", Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(3), pp.303~314 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)