본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학수학능력시험 스페인어Ⅰ 과목에서의 합답형 유형 활용 실태 분석

nalysis of the combined response questions in the Spanish Ⅰ section of the CSAT

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently, the increase of combined response questions in the CSAT Spanish I section has been attributed to a larger student study burden as well as question writing errors. In order to deal with the issues, it is necessary to diagnose the problems in developing combined response questions and seek ways to create more valid combined response questions. The study analyzed 38 combined response questions in terms of contents, percentage of correct answers, item discriminations, number of options, and negatively worded stems. The study results are as follows. First, combined response questions are more appropriate as high difficulty level questions. The combination of options of the responses should not provide a clue for the correct answer. Second, the total number of the options should not exceed four. There is no need to increase many options to increase item difficulty because it is possible to discriminate high level students with small number of options. Third, none of the above as response is not appropriate since this would be lower both item discrimination and reliability. Fourth, negatively worded stems should be avoided because they confuse and make test takers choose distracters even if they understand the questions correctly.

Abstract

Recently, the increase of combined response questions in the CSAT Spanish I section has been attributed to a larger student study burden as well as question writing errors. In order to deal with the issues, it is necessary to diagnose the problems in developing combined response questions and seek ways to create more valid combined response questions. The study analyzed 38 combined response questions in terms of contents, percentage of correct answers, item discriminations, number of options, and negatively worded stems. The study results are as follows. First, combined response questions are more appropriate as high difficulty level questions. The combination of options of the responses should not provide a clue for the correct answer. Second, the total number of the options should not exceed four. There is no need to increase many options to increase item difficulty because it is possible to discriminate high level students with small number of options. Third, none of the above as response is not appropriate since this would be lower both item discrimination and reliability. Fourth, negatively worded stems should be avoided because they confuse and make test takers choose distracters even if they understand the questions correctly.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 권대훈, "교육평가" (2008), 학지사
  2. 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제" (2010), 학지사
  3. 성태제, "대학수학능력시험의 ‘모든 것이 정답’ 혹은 ‘정답 없음’ 답지를 포함한 선다형 문항특성 분석", 교육학연구, 36(1), pp.131~147 (1998)
  4. 김성훈, "예비교사를 위한교육평가" (2010), 학지사
  5. Budescu, David V., "Optimal number of options: An investigation of the assumtion of proportionality", Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(3), pp.183~196 (1985)
  6. Gorman, Michael, "Manual of business Spanish: A comprehensive language guide" (2001), Routledge
  7. Haladyna, T. M., "Validity of a toxotomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules", Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), pp.51~78 (1989)
  8. Osterlind, Steven J., "Constructing test items: multiple-choice, constructed-response, performance, and other formats" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  9. Popham, W. James, "Modern Educational Measurement: Practical Guidelines for Educational Leaders" (2000), Allyn and Bacon
  10. Real Academia Española, "Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española" (2010), Espasa Libros

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)