20세기 돈 후안 비교연구 - 하신또 그라우의 『농락하지 않는 농락자』와 곤살로 또렌떼 바예스떼르의 『돈 후안』을 중심으로
A Comparative Study on Don Juan of the 20th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
In this study, we compare the works of Jacinto Grau and Gonzalo Torrente Ballester -El burlador que no se burla(1927) and Don Juan(1963), respectively- with the exemplary works of Don Juan, El Burlador de Sevilla y convidado de piedra of Tirso de Molina and Don Juan Tenorio of José Zorrilla. As we know, through the works of Tirso de Molina and José Zorrilla, two fundamental elements of Don Juan works have been developed: the depravation of the protagonist and the double invitation of stone. But in the works of Jacinto Grau and Gonzalo Torrente Ballester, Don Juan becomes a seducer, not a mocker, and the anecdote of the stone's invitation disappears. In previous works, the double invitation episode carried out the function of punishment against the threat of social structure and blasphemy. However, in the two works of the twentieth century, when modernity is built, the story of the double invitation is replaced by another because it is not scientific. Also, by the development of psychoanalysis, the protagonist becomes the focus of interest. The protagonist of the works of writers of the twentieth century neither deceives nor mocks women. In addition, the hero of Torrente Ballester is very religious and intelligent. The novelist invented a new myth through a reinterpretation of Don Juan.
Abstract
In this study, we compare the works of Jacinto Grau and Gonzalo Torrente Ballester -El burlador que no se burla(1927) and Don Juan(1963), respectively- with the exemplary works of Don Juan, El Burlador de Sevilla y convidado de piedra of Tirso de Molina and Don Juan Tenorio of José Zorrilla. As we know, through the works of Tirso de Molina and José Zorrilla, two fundamental elements of Don Juan works have been developed: the depravation of the protagonist and the double invitation of stone. But in the works of Jacinto Grau and Gonzalo Torrente Ballester, Don Juan becomes a seducer, not a mocker, and the anecdote of the stone's invitation disappears. In previous works, the double invitation episode carried out the function of punishment against the threat of social structure and blasphemy. However, in the two works of the twentieth century, when modernity is built, the story of the double invitation is replaced by another because it is not scientific. Also, by the development of psychoanalysis, the protagonist becomes the focus of interest. The protagonist of the works of writers of the twentieth century neither deceives nor mocks women. In addition, the hero of Torrente Ballester is very religious and intelligent. The novelist invented a new myth through a reinterpretation of Don Juan.
참고문헌 (31)
- 이소현, "돈환 신화의 역사성과 이데올로기 배경", 석사, 서어서문학, pp.1998
- 전원화, "돈 후안 설화에서의 성(性)과 사회", 박사, pp.2000
- 정동섭, "돈 후안. 치명적인 유혹의 대명사" (2006), 살림
- 정동섭, "돈 후안 비교연구: 기원에서 19세기까지", 스페인어문학, (31), pp.229~249 (2004), 한국스페인어문학회
- 정동섭, "바로크적 진실과 낭만주의적 거짓 - 욕망의 삼각형이론을 중심으로 한 돈 후안 비교 연구 -", 스페인어문학, (29), pp.371~386 (2003), 한국스페인어문학회
- 정동섭, "20세기 돈 후안 비교연구 - 아소린의 『돈 후안』과 바예-인클란의 『사자(死者)의 예복』, 우나무노의 『사제 후안 또는 세상은 연극이다』를 중심으로", 스페인어문학, (76), pp.177~198 (2015), 한국스페인어문학회
- Atribuida a Tirso de Molina, "El burlador de Sevilla" (1997), Cátedra
- Becerra, Carmen, "Don Juan Tenorio en la España del siglo XX: Literatura y Cine" (1998), Cátedra
- Castro Rivas Jéssica, "Don Juan de Gonzalo Torrente Ballester: Reelaboración de los orígenes", Revista chilena de Literatura, 70, pp.149~165 (2007)
- De la Fuente Ballesteros, Ricardo, "Notas al Don Juan de Torrente Ballester", Castilla: Estudios de literatura, 2(3), pp.41~56 (1981)
- Fartos, M., "Conversación con Gonzalo Torrente Ballester", en ACHE, 1980(1), pp.15~18 (1980)
- El burlador que no se burla, "El señor de Pigmalión", pp.1977, Grau, Jacinto
- Isasi Angulo, Amando C, "Don Juan, Evolución dramática del mito" (1972), Bruguera
- Lasaga Medina, José, "Las metamorfosis del seductor" (2004), Síntesis
- Mandrell, James, "Don Juan and Revision: Myth, Textuality, and Don Juan Tenorio" (1984), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Navas Ruiz, Ricardo, "El romanticismo español: Historia y crítica" (1970), Anaya
- Pedraza Jiménez, Felipe B, "Manual de literatura española X. Novecentismo y vanguardia: Introducción, prosistas y dramaturgos" (1987), Cénlit
- Pérez-Bustamante Mourier, Ana Sofía, "Don Juan, de Gonzalo Torrente Ballester: El monstruo en su laberinto", Actas del Congreso sobre José Zorrilla: Valladolid, 1993, pp.5~18 (1993)
- Pérez-Bustamante Mourier, Ana Sofía, "Don Juan Tenorio en la España del siglo XX: Literatura y cine" (1998), Cátedra
- Rodríguez López-Vázquez, Alfredo, "El burlador de Sevilla", pp.11~73 (1997), Cátedra
- Ruiz Ramón, Francisco, "Historia del teatro español" (1986), Cátedra
- Sevilla Vallejo, Santiago, "Don Juan, el mito vivo en Gonzalo Torrente Ballester", Dicenda. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica, 31, pp.213~228 (2013)
- Torrente Ballester, Gonzalo, "Don Juan" (2004), La voz de Galicia
- Torrente Ballester, Gonzalo, "Teatro español contemporáneo", pp.157~188 (1957), Guadarrama
- Vallejo González, Irene, "Don Juan Tenorio en la España del siglo XX: Literatura y Cine" (1998), Cátedra
- "El amor, las mujeres y don Juan, en el Don Juan de Gonzalo Torrente Ballester"[URL]
- Villagrá Saura, Castalina, "Don Juan y los fantasmas: un intento de puesta en escena simbolista", Castilla, 28(29), pp.267~280 (2003)
- Walsh, Anne L, "Belief and Disbelief as Part of Narrative: Gonzalo Torrente Ballester’s Don Juan, a Road Less Travelled", Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 76, pp.349~358 (1999)
- Yamaguchi, Hajime, "La estructura narrativa del Don Juan de Torrente Ballester", Revista de filología, 33, pp.237~250 (2015)
- Zorrilla, José, "Don Juan Tenorio" (1994), Castalia
- Zorrilla, José, "돈 후안 떼노리오" (1844), 책세상