스페인어의 복합 시제구 생략(complex TP-ellipsis)에 관한 소고
Some Notes on Complex TP-Ellipsis in Spanish
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Spanish, there are cases in which both the matrix TP and the embedded TP are elided all together, leaving apparently one remnant per clause. This paper examines how such kind of complex process of clausal ellipsis can be accounted for in a principled way, taking into consideration the existing analyses of TP-deletion. I argue that complex TP-ellipsis in Spanish is derived by deleting both the matrix TP and the embedded TP without moving the remnants of each TP. I claim that a deletion analysis assuming in-situ remnants is adequate to deal with complex TP-ellipsis and is also supported by the fact that heads like complementizer and negation (or the positive polarity marker sí) cannot undergo the alleged movement of the remnant to the specifier of a functional phrase. I also discuss why non-null subject languages like English and French do not allow complex clausal ellipsis of both matrix TP and embedded TP, by claiming that the difference between Spanish and English/French may be attributable to the presence/absence of (some sort of) the so-called Comp-trace effects in the context of complex TP-ellipsis.
Abstract
In Spanish, there are cases in which both the matrix TP and the embedded TP are elided all together, leaving apparently one remnant per clause. This paper examines how such kind of complex process of clausal ellipsis can be accounted for in a principled way, taking into consideration the existing analyses of TP-deletion. I argue that complex TP-ellipsis in Spanish is derived by deleting both the matrix TP and the embedded TP without moving the remnants of each TP. I claim that a deletion analysis assuming in-situ remnants is adequate to deal with complex TP-ellipsis and is also supported by the fact that heads like complementizer and negation (or the positive polarity marker sí) cannot undergo the alleged movement of the remnant to the specifier of a functional phrase. I also discuss why non-null subject languages like English and French do not allow complex clausal ellipsis of both matrix TP and embedded TP, by claiming that the difference between Spanish and English/French may be attributable to the presence/absence of (some sort of) the so-called Comp-trace effects in the context of complex TP-ellipsis.
참고문헌 (51)
- Abe, J., "The In-Situ Approach to Sluicing" (2015), John Benjamins
- Abe, J., "Make Short Answers Shorter: Support for the In-Situ Approach", Syntax, 19(3), pp.223~255 (2016)
- Aelbrecht, L., "The syntactic licensing of ellipsis" (2010), John Benjamins
- Aelbrecht, L, "What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how", The Linguistic Review, 33(4), pp.453~482 (2016)
- Agbayani, B, "Gapping, Pseudogapping, and sideward movement", Studia Linguistica, 58(3), pp.185~211 (2004)
- Bošković, J, "On Movement out of Moved Elements, Labels, and Phases", Linguistic Inquiry, 49(2), pp.247~282 (2018)
- Bosque, I, "Negación y ellipsis", ELUA, 2, pp.171~199 (1984)
- Bresnan, J., "Formal syntax", pp.157~196 (1977), Academic Press
- Brucart, J. M., "La elisión sintáatica en español" (1987), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
- Brucart, J. M., "Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española", pp.2787~2863 (1999), Espasa Calpe
- Brucart, J, "The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics", pp.579~601 (2012)
- van Craenenbroeck, J, "The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.701~745 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Chomsky, N, "Filters and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.425~504 (1977)
- Citko, B., "Ways of Structure Building", pp.44~65 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Depiante, M., "The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping", bare argument ellipsis, University of Connecticut, 2000
- Depiante, M, "Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis", Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüíıstica, 1, pp.53~69 (2004)
- Fernández-Sánchez, J., "Embedded gapping isn’t gapping", 석사, CLT, 2016
- Fernández-Sánchez, J, "Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish", Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 55(1), pp.53~87 (2019)
- Gengel, K., "Focus and ellipsis: a generative analysis of pseudogapping and other elliptical structures", 박사, pp.2007
- Gengel, K., "Pseudogapping and ellipsis" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Hankamer, J., "Deletion in coordinate structures" (1979), Garland
- Hankamer, J, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic inquiry, pp.391~428 (1976)
- Hudson, R., "Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node raising", Language, 52, pp.535~562 (1976)
- Jayaseelan, K. A, "Incomplete VP deletion and Gapping", Linguistic Analysis, 20, pp.64~81 (1990)
- Johnson, K, "In search of the English middle field", 석사, pp.2004
- Johnson, K., "The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell
- Johnson, K., "Gapping is not (VP-)ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2), pp.289~328 (2009)
- Johnson, K., "The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Jung, W-S., "Not-stripping and Pseudostripping in Spanish", Proceedings of 17th Seoul International Conference On Generative Grammar 2015 (2015)
- Jung, W-S., "The Non-Unity of Gapping", 박사, pp.2017
- Kubota, Y, "Gapping as hypothetical reasoning", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34(1), pp.101~156 (2016)
- LaCara, N, "Ellipsis is not Spell-Out: What Scandinavian tells us about ellipsis", Grasping Ellipsis, University of Campinas (2015)
- Laka, I., "Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections", 박사, pp.1990
- Landau, I, "Constraining Head-Stranding Ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 51(2), pp.281~318 (2020)
- Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J., "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(6), pp.661~738 (2004)
- Ortega-Santos, I., "The syntax of Why-Stripping", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33(1), pp.323~370 (2015)
- Overfelt, J., "Rightward Movement: A Study in Locality", 박사, pp.2015
- Pesetsky, D., "The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax" (2017)
- Potter, D., "A two-source hypothesis for Gapping", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(4), pp.1123~1160 (2017)
- Rizzi, L., "Relativised Minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Saab, A., "Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis", 박사, pp.2009
- Sag, I., "Deletion and Logical Form", 박사, pp.1976
- Thoms, G, "Pseudogapping, Parallelism, and the Scope of Focus", Syntax, 19(3), pp.286~307 (2016)
- Toosarvandani, M, "Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism", Linguistic Inquiry, 47(2), pp.381~390 (2016)
- Uriagereka, J., "Working Minimalism" (1999), MIT Press
- Vicente, L., "Short negative replies in Spanish", Linguistics in the Neatherlands, 23, pp.199~211 (2006)
- Villa-Garcia, J., "Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish", Probus, 24(2), pp.257~314 (2012)
- Villa-Garcia, J., "Along the left periphery" (2015), John Benjamins Publishing
- Winkler, S., "The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure" (2016), Oxford University Press
- Wurmbrand, S, "Stripping and Topless Complements", Linguistic Inquiry, 48(2), pp.341~366 (2017)