Comparative evaluation of supplemental zilpaterol hydrochloride sources on growth performance, dietary energetics and carcass characteristics of finishing lambs
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: We compare the effects of three different approved sources of supplemental zilpaterol on growth-performance responses and carcass characteristics of finishing lambs. Methods: Twenty four Pelibuey×Katahdin lambs (46.75±2.43 kg) were used in a 33-day feeding trial. Lambs were fed a dry rolled corn-based finishing diet. Treatments consisted of the non-supplemental basal diet (Control) versus the basal diet supplemented with 125 mg zilpaterol/kg of diet (as fed basis) from three commercial sources marketed in Mexico: Zilmax (ZIL), Grofactor, and Zipamix. Results: Compared to controls, zilpaterol (ZH) supplementation did not affect dry matter intake (DMI), but increased carcass adjusted daily weight gain (ADG, 36.7%), gain efficiency (34.2%), and dietary net energy (26.0%), and decreased (23.4%) the ratio of observed:expected DMI. Compared to controls, supplemental ZH increased hot carcass weight (6.4%), dressing percentage (3.2%), m. longissimus thoracis (LM) area (15.6%), and shoulder muscle:fat ratio (28.7%), but decreased kidney-pelvic-heart fat, and fat thickness. Supplemental ZH increased 10.9% and 14.3% whole cut weight of loin and leg, respectively, and the proportion (as percentage of cold carcass weight) of leg (4.3%). These increases were reflected in greater forequarter and hindquarter weights. Lambs fed ZH increased (4.6%) empty body weight (EBW) and reduced (14.7%) liver/spleen weight (as g/kg EBW). Likewise, ZH supplementation tended (p = 0.08) to lower (8.9%) visceral fat. Growth performance, energetic efficiency, hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, LM area and whole cuts were not different across supplemental ZH sources. However, compared with non-supplemented controls, only ZIL appreciably decreased carcass fat distribution, including fat thickness, percentage kidney pelvic and heart fat, shoulder fat, and visceral fat. Conclusion: Supplemental ZH increases ADG, gain efficiency, carcass dressing percentage, and LM area. The magnitude of these responses was similar among ZH sources. Nevertheless, compared with non-supplemented controls, only ZIL appreciably decreases carcass fat. The basis for this is uncertain, but indicative that some practical differences in zilpaterol bio-equivalency may exist across commercial sources tested.
Abstract
Objective: We compare the effects of three different approved sources of supplemental zilpaterol on growth-performance responses and carcass characteristics of finishing lambs. Methods: Twenty four Pelibuey×Katahdin lambs (46.75±2.43 kg) were used in a 33-day feeding trial. Lambs were fed a dry rolled corn-based finishing diet. Treatments consisted of the non-supplemental basal diet (Control) versus the basal diet supplemented with 125 mg zilpaterol/kg of diet (as fed basis) from three commercial sources marketed in Mexico: Zilmax (ZIL), Grofactor, and Zipamix. Results: Compared to controls, zilpaterol (ZH) supplementation did not affect dry matter intake (DMI), but increased carcass adjusted daily weight gain (ADG, 36.7%), gain efficiency (34.2%), and dietary net energy (26.0%), and decreased (23.4%) the ratio of observed:expected DMI. Compared to controls, supplemental ZH increased hot carcass weight (6.4%), dressing percentage (3.2%), m. longissimus thoracis (LM) area (15.6%), and shoulder muscle:fat ratio (28.7%), but decreased kidney-pelvic-heart fat, and fat thickness. Supplemental ZH increased 10.9% and 14.3% whole cut weight of loin and leg, respectively, and the proportion (as percentage of cold carcass weight) of leg (4.3%). These increases were reflected in greater forequarter and hindquarter weights. Lambs fed ZH increased (4.6%) empty body weight (EBW) and reduced (14.7%) liver/spleen weight (as g/kg EBW). Likewise, ZH supplementation tended (p = 0.08) to lower (8.9%) visceral fat. Growth performance, energetic efficiency, hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, LM area and whole cuts were not different across supplemental ZH sources. However, compared with non-supplemented controls, only ZIL appreciably decreased carcass fat distribution, including fat thickness, percentage kidney pelvic and heart fat, shoulder fat, and visceral fat. Conclusion: Supplemental ZH increases ADG, gain efficiency, carcass dressing percentage, and LM area. The magnitude of these responses was similar among ZH sources. Nevertheless, compared with non-supplemented controls, only ZIL appreciably decreases carcass fat. The basis for this is uncertain, but indicative that some practical differences in zilpaterol bio-equivalency may exist across commercial sources tested.
참고문헌 (30)
- "Generic drugs facts" (2016)[URL]
- "The slow rise of generic animal drugs" (2016)[URL]
- Estrada-Angulo A, "Influence of level of zilpaterol chlorhydrate supplementation on growth performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot lambs", Small Rum Res, 80, pp.107~110 (2008)
- Macías-Cruz U, "Effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of ewe lambs during heat-stress conditions", Anim Prod Sci, 50, pp.983~989 (2010)
- Ríos-Rincón FG, "Effect of level of dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride(β2-agonist)on performance, carcass characteristics and visceral organ mass in hairy lambs fed all-concentrate diets", J Appl Anim Res, 38, pp.33~38 (2010)
- López-Carlos MA, "Effect of two beta adrenergic agonists and feeding duration on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of finishing lambs", Livest Sci, 138, pp.251~258 (2011)
- AOAC, "Official methods of analysis", pp.69~ (2000), AOAC International
- Van Soest PJ, "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition", J Dairy Sci, 74, pp.3583~3597 (1994)
- Committee on nutrient requirement of sheep, "Nutrient requirement of sheep" (1985), National Academy Press
- Committee on nutrient requirement of small ruminant, "Nutrient requirement of small ruminant: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids" (2007), National Academy Press
- Zinn RA, "Performance by feedlot steers and heifers : daily gain, mature body weight, dry matter intake, and dietary energetics", J Anim Sci, 86, pp.2680~2689 (2008)
- USDA, "Official United States standards for grades of lambs, yearling mutton, and mutton carcasses. Secretary of Agriculture under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 1087; 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627)", USDA, ~ (1992)
- NAMP, "The meat buyers guide", NAMP, ~ (1997)
- Luaces ML, "Predicting equations for tisular composition in carcass of Gallega breed lambs", Arch Zootec, 57, pp.1~12 (2008)
- SAS, "User’s guide: statistics version SAS", STAT 9, 2000
- Plascencia A, "Influence of the B-agonist, zilpaterol, on growth performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers", Proc West Sect Am Soc Anim Sci, 50, pp.331~334 (1999)
- Bradley J. Johnson, "Historical Overview of the Effect of β-Adrenergic Agonists on Beef Cattle Production", Animal Bioscience, 27(5), pp.757~766 (2014), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- Ortiz-Rodea A, "Effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on animal performance and carcass characteristics in sheep : a meta-analysis", J Appl Anim Res, 41, pp.104~112 (2016)
- López-Carlos MA, "Effect of the administration program of 2 β-adrenergic agonists on growth performance and carcass and meat characteristics of feedlot ram lambs", J Anim Sci, 90, pp.1521~1531 (2012)
- Robles-Estrada JC, "Effect of two β-adrenergic agonists on finishing performance and carcass characteristics in lamb feed all-concentrate diets", J Appl Anim Res, 36, pp.33~36 (2009)
- José Armando Partida-de-la-Peña, "Effect of zilpaterol hydrochloride on the carcass characteristics of Katahdin lamb terminal crosses", Veterinaria México OA, 2(2) (2015), Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico[DOI]
- A. Estrada-Angulo, "Effects of Combining Feed Grade Urea and a Slow-release Urea Product on Performance, Dietary Energetics and Carcass Characteristics of Feedlot Lambs Fed Finishing Diets with Different Starch to Acid Detergent Fiber Ratios", Animal Bioscience, 29(12), pp.1725~1733 (2016), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Mondragón J, "Effects of feed supplementation of zilpaterol hydrochloride on growth performance and carcass traits of finishing lambs", Acta Agric Scand A-Anim Sci, 60, pp.47~52 (2010)
- Avendaño-Reyes L, "Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and wholesale cut yield of hair-breed ewe lambs consuming feedlot diets under moderate environmental conditions", J Anim Sci, 89, pp.4188~4194 (2011)
- Macías-Cruz U, "Growth and carcass characteristics of lambs finished with zilpaterol hydrochloride in grazing alfalfa", Rev Mex Cienc Pecu, 7, pp.234~252 (2016)
- Rojo-Rubio R, "Zilpaterol hydrochloride improves growth performance and carcass traits without affecting wholesale cut yields of hair sheep finished in feedlot", J Appl Anim Res, 46, pp.375~379 (2018)
- Hansen JA, "Effects of somatotropin and salbutamol in three genotypes of finishing barrows : growth, carcass, and calorimeter criteria", J Anim Sci, 75, pp.1798~1809 (1997)
- May ND, "Byproduct yields of serially harvested calf-fed Holstein steers fed zilpaterol hydro chloride", J Anim Sci, 94, pp.4006~4015 (2016)
- Ferrell CL, "Cow type and the nutritional environment : Nutritional aspects", J Anim Sci, 61, pp.725~741 (1985)
- Avendaño-Reyes L, "Evaluation of the efficacy of Grofactor, a beta-adrenergic agonist based on zilpaterol hydrochloride, using feedlot finishing bulls", J Anim Sci, 94, pp.2954~2961 (2016)