A double-labeling marker-based method for estimating inbreeding and parental genomic components in a population under conservation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The objective of a conservation program is to maintain maximum genetic diversity and preserve the viability of a breed. However, the efficiency of a program is influenced by the ability to accurately measure and predict genetic diversity. Methods: To examine this question, we conducted a simulation in which common measures (i.e. heterozygosity) and novel measures (identity-by-descent probabilities and parental genomic components) were used to estimate genetic diversity within a conserved population using double-labeled single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Results: The results showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of identity-by-state probabilities and heterozygosity were close to identity by descent (IBD) probabilities, which reflect the true genetic diversity. Expected heterozygosity most closely aligned with IBD. All common measures suggested that practices used in the current Chinese pig conservation program result in a ~5% loss in genetic diversity every 10 generations. Parental genomic components were also analyzed to monitor real-time changes in genomic components for each male and female ancestor. The analysis showed that ~7.5% of male families and ~30% of female families were lost every 5 generations. After 50 generations of simulated conservation, 4 male families lost ~50% of their initial genomic components, and the genomic components for 24.8% of the female families were lost entirely. Conclusion: In summary, compared with the true genetic diversity value obtained using double-labeled markers, expected heterozygosity appears to be the optimal indicator. Parental genomic components analysis provides a more detailed picture of genetic diversity and can be used to guide conservation management practices.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of a conservation program is to maintain maximum genetic diversity and preserve the viability of a breed. However, the efficiency of a program is influenced by the ability to accurately measure and predict genetic diversity. Methods: To examine this question, we conducted a simulation in which common measures (i.e. heterozygosity) and novel measures (identity-by-descent probabilities and parental genomic components) were used to estimate genetic diversity within a conserved population using double-labeled single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Results: The results showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of identity-by-state probabilities and heterozygosity were close to identity by descent (IBD) probabilities, which reflect the true genetic diversity. Expected heterozygosity most closely aligned with IBD. All common measures suggested that practices used in the current Chinese pig conservation program result in a ~5% loss in genetic diversity every 10 generations. Parental genomic components were also analyzed to monitor real-time changes in genomic components for each male and female ancestor. The analysis showed that ~7.5% of male families and ~30% of female families were lost every 5 generations. After 50 generations of simulated conservation, 4 male families lost ~50% of their initial genomic components, and the genomic components for 24.8% of the female families were lost entirely. Conclusion: In summary, compared with the true genetic diversity value obtained using double-labeled markers, expected heterozygosity appears to be the optimal indicator. Parental genomic components analysis provides a more detailed picture of genetic diversity and can be used to guide conservation management practices.
참고문헌 (26)
- Frankham R, "Introduction to conservation genetics" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Oldenbroek JK, "Utilization and conservation of farm animal genetic resources" (2007), Wageningen Academic Publishers
- Lush JL, "Chance as a cause of changes in gene frequency within pure breeds of livestock", Am Nat, 80, pp.318~342 (1946)[DOI]
- Falconer DS, "Introduction to quantitative genetics" (1996), Longman Group
- Engelsma KA, "Estimating genetic diversity across the neutral genome with the use of dense marker maps", Genet Sel Evol, 42, pp.12~ (2010)[DOI]
- Silió L, "Measuring inbreeding in a closed pig strain from high-density SNPs genotypes", Proceedings of the 9th World Congress Genetics Applied Livestock Production Congress 2010 (2010)
- Fernandez J, "Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs", Genetics, 170, pp.1313~1321 (2005)[DOI]
- Carothers AD, "Estimating human inbreeding coefficients : comparison of genealogical and marker heterozygosity approaches", Ann Hum Genet, 70, pp.666~676 (2006)[DOI]
- de Cara MA, "Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes", J Anim Breed Genet, 128, pp.456~464 (2011)[DOI]
- Daetwyler HD, "Relationship of multilocus homozygosity and inbreeding in Canadian Holstein sires", Can J Anim Sci, 86, pp.578~579 (2006)
- Gomez-Romano F, "Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry : the effect of marker density and effective population size", Genet Sel Evol, 45, pp.38~ (2013)[DOI]
- Lu Y, "Dynamic change of genetic diversity in conserved populations with different initial genetic architectures", J Integr Agric, 12, pp.1225~1233 (2013)[DOI]
- Nei M, "Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 70, pp.3321~3323 (1973)[DOI]
- Toro MA, "Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations", Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 360, pp.1367~1378 (2005)[DOI]
- Ai H, "Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers", PLoS ONE, 8, pp.e56001~ (2013)[DOI]
- Windig JJ, "Rapid haplotype reconstruction in pedigrees with dense marker maps", J Anim Breed Genet, 121, pp.26~39 (2004)[DOI]
- Yang J, "GCTA : a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis", Am J Hum Genet, 88, pp.76~82 (2011)[DOI]
- Do C, "NeEstimator v2 : re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size(Ne)from genetic data", Mol Ecol Resour, 14, pp.209~214 (2014)[DOI]
- Rodriguez De Cara MA, "Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes", Mol Ecol, 22, pp.6091~6099 (2013)[DOI]
- Gómez-Romano F, "The use of coancestry based on shared segments for maintaining genetic diversity", J Anim Breed Genet, 133, pp.357~365 (2016)[DOI]
- Groeneveld LF, "Genetic diversity in farm animals--a review", Anim Genet, 41(Suppl 1), pp.6~31 (2010)[DOI]
- Engelsma KA, "Pedigree-and marker-based methods in the estimation of genetic diversity in small groups of Holstein cattle", J Anim Breed Genet, 129, pp.195~205 (2012)[DOI]
- Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources, "FAO", FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, ~ (2011)
- Draft guidelines on in vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, "FAO", FAO, ~ (2012)
- Bosse M, "Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations", Genome Res, 25, pp.970~981 (2015)[DOI]
- Hall SJ, "Prioritization based on neutral genetic diversity may fail to conserve important characteristics in cattle breeds", J Anim Breed Genet, 129, pp.218~225 (2012)[DOI]