Single nucleotide polymorphism-based analysis of the genetic structure of Liangshan pig population
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To conserve and utilize the genetic resources of a traditional Chinese indigenous pig breed, Liangshan pig, we assessed the genetic diversity, genetic structure, and genetic distance in this study. Methods: We used 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip for SNP detection of 139 individuals in the Liangshan Pig Conservation Farm. Results: The genetically closed conserved population consisted of five overlapping generations, and the total effective content of the population (Ne) was 15. The whole population was divided into five boar families and one non-boar family. Among them, the effective size of each generation subpopulation continuously decreased. However, the proportion of polymorphic markers (P<sub>N</sub>) first decreased and then increased. The average genetic distance of these 139 Liangshan pigs was 0.2823±0.0259, and the average genetic distance of the 14 boars was 0.2723±0.0384. Thus, it can be deduced that the genetic distance changed from generation to generation. In the conserved population, 983 runs of homozygosity (ROH) were detected, and the majority of ROH (80%) were within 100 Mb. The inbreeding coefficient calculated based on ROH showed an average value of 0.026 for the whole population. In addition, the inbreeding coefficient of each generation subpopulation initially increased and then decreased. In the pedigree of the whole conserved population, the error rate of paternal information was more than 11.35% while the maternal information was more than 2.13%. Conclusion: This molecular study of the population genetic structure of Liangshan pig showed loss of genetic diversity during the closed cross-generation reproduction process. It is necessary to improve the mating plan or introduce new outside blood to ensure longterm preservation of Liangshan pig.
Abstract
Objective: To conserve and utilize the genetic resources of a traditional Chinese indigenous pig breed, Liangshan pig, we assessed the genetic diversity, genetic structure, and genetic distance in this study. Methods: We used 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip for SNP detection of 139 individuals in the Liangshan Pig Conservation Farm. Results: The genetically closed conserved population consisted of five overlapping generations, and the total effective content of the population (Ne) was 15. The whole population was divided into five boar families and one non-boar family. Among them, the effective size of each generation subpopulation continuously decreased. However, the proportion of polymorphic markers (PN) first decreased and then increased. The average genetic distance of these 139 Liangshan pigs was 0.2823±0.0259, and the average genetic distance of the 14 boars was 0.2723±0.0384. Thus, it can be deduced that the genetic distance changed from generation to generation. In the conserved population, 983 runs of homozygosity (ROH) were detected, and the majority of ROH (80%) were within 100 Mb. The inbreeding coefficient calculated based on ROH showed an average value of 0.026 for the whole population. In addition, the inbreeding coefficient of each generation subpopulation initially increased and then decreased. In the pedigree of the whole conserved population, the error rate of paternal information was more than 11.35% while the maternal information was more than 2.13%. Conclusion: This molecular study of the population genetic structure of Liangshan pig showed loss of genetic diversity during the closed cross-generation reproduction process. It is necessary to improve the mating plan or introduce new outside blood to ensure longterm preservation of Liangshan pig.
참고문헌 (27)
- Fang M, "The phylogeny of Chinese indigenous pig breeds inferred from microsatellite markers", Anim Genet, 36, pp.7~13 (2005)[DOI]
- Jia Luo, "Estimation of Growth Curves and Suitable Slaughter Weight of the Liangshan Pig", Animal Bioscience, 28(9), pp.1252~1258 (2015), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Jones GF, "The genetics of the pig", pp.17~50 (1998), CAB International
- Ai H, "Population history and genomic signatures for high-altitude adaptation in Tibetan pigs", BMC Genomics, 15, pp.834~ (2014)[DOI]
- Ai H, "Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers", PLoS One, 8, pp.e56001~ (2013)[DOI]
- Chomczynski P, "The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction : twenty-something years on", Nat Protoc, 1, pp.581~585 (2006)[DOI]
- Purcell S, "PLINK : a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses", Am J Hum Genet, 81, pp.559~575 (2007)[DOI]
- Barbato M, "SNeP : a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data", Front Genet, 6, pp.109~ (2015)[DOI]
- Chan BKC, "Biostatistics for epidemiology and public health using RAdv", pp.81~154 (2015), Springer Publishing Company
- VanRaden PM, "Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions", J Dairy Sci, 91, pp.4414~4423 (2008)[DOI]
- Kumar S, "MEGA X : molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms", Mol Biol Evol, 35, pp.1547~1549 (2018)[DOI]
- Silió L, "Measuring inbreeding and inbreeding depression on pig growth from pedigree or SNP-derived metrics", J Anim Breed Genet, 130, pp.34960~ (2013)[DOI]
- Wiggans GR, "Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluation", J Dairy Sci, 93, pp.2287~2292 (2010)[DOI]
- SanCristobal M, "Genetic diversity within and between European pig breeds using microsatellite markers", Anim Genet, 37, pp.189~198 (2006)[DOI]
- Visscher PM, "Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection", J Dairy Sci, 85, pp.2368~2375 (2002)[DOI]
- Munoz PR, "Genomic relationship matrix for correcting pedigree errors in breeding populations : impact on genetic parameters and genomic selection accuracy", Crop Sci, 54, pp.1115~1123 (2014)[DOI]
- Powell JE, "Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies", Nat Rev Genet, 11, pp.800~805 (2010)[DOI]
- Waples RS, "Making sense of genetic estimates of effective population size", Mol Ecol, 25, pp.4689~4691 (2016)[DOI]
- Waples RK, "Estimating contemporary effective population size in non-model species using linkage disequilibrium across thousands of loci", Heredity, 117, pp.233~240 (2016)[DOI]
- Wang L, "Genomewide and local pattern of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase for 3 Danish pig breeds", BMC Genet, 14, pp.115~ (2013)[DOI]
- 신동현, "Extent of linkage disequilibrium and effective population size of the Landrace population in Korea", Animal Bioscience, 31(8), pp.1078~1087 (2018), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- Chen J, "The genetic diversity and population structures of indigenous pig breeds in Zhejiang Province revealed by GGRS sequencing", Anim Genet, 49, pp.36~42 (2018)[DOI]
- X. Wang, "Genetic Diversity of 10 Indigenous Pig Breeds in China by Using Microsatellite Markers", Animal Bioscience, 17(9), pp.1219~1222 (2004), 아세아·태평양축산학회
- Bjelland DW, "Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using wholegenome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding", J Dairy Sci, 96, pp.4697~4706 (2013)[DOI]
- Kirin M, "Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity", PLoS One, 5, pp.e13996~ (2010)[DOI]
- Zanella R, "Genetic diversity analysis of two commercial breeds of pigs using genomic and pedigree data", Genet Sel Evol, 48, pp.24~ (2016)[DOI]
- Bosse M, "Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome : consequence of demography and the recombination landscape", PLoS Genet, 8, pp.e1003100~ (2012)[DOI]