본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of rectum fecal bacterial community of finishing bulls fed high-concentrate diets with active dry yeast and yeast culture supplementation

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding active dry yeast (ADY) and yeast culture (YC) on fecal bacterial community in finishing bulls fed highconcentrate diets in the same experimental environment. Methods: Forty-five healthy finishing cattle (Simmental×Chinese Luxi yellow bulls; 24 months; 505±29 kg) were randomly divided into three groups: i) CON group (control group, only fed basal diet), ii) ADY group (fed basal diet + active dry yeast), and iii) YC group (fed basal diet + yeast culture). At the end of the trial, nine rectum fecal samples were randomly selected from each group for bacterial DNA sequencing. Results: There was no difference among groups about alpha diversity indices (all p>0.05), including ACE, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson indices. Principal component analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis showed a high similarity among three groups. Compared with CON group, ADY and YC groups had greater relative abundance of c_Clostridia, o_Oscillospirales, and f_Oscillospiraceae, but lesser relative abundance of g_Megasphaera, and s_Megasphaera_elsdenii (all p<0.01). And, the relative abundances of p_Firmicutes (p = 0.03), s_Prevotella_sp (p = 0.03), o_Clostridiales (p<0.01), g_Clostridium (p<0.01), f_Caloramatoraceae (p<0.01), and f_Ruminococcaceae (p = 0.04) were increased in the ADY group. The PICRUSt2 prediction results showed that the metabolic pathways had no significant differences among groups (p>0.05). Besides, the relative abundance of c_Clostridia (r = 0.42), and f_Oscillospiraceae (r = 0.40) were positively correlated to average daily gain of finishing bulls (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both of ADY and YC had no effect on diversity of fecal bacteria in finishing bulls, but the supplementation of ADY and YC can improve the large intestinal function in finishing bulls by increasing the abundance of cellulolytic bacteria and altering the abundance of lactic acid-utilizing bacteria.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding active dry yeast (ADY) and yeast culture (YC) on fecal bacterial community in finishing bulls fed highconcentrate diets in the same experimental environment. Methods: Forty-five healthy finishing cattle (Simmental×Chinese Luxi yellow bulls; 24 months; 505±29 kg) were randomly divided into three groups: i) CON group (control group, only fed basal diet), ii) ADY group (fed basal diet + active dry yeast), and iii) YC group (fed basal diet + yeast culture). At the end of the trial, nine rectum fecal samples were randomly selected from each group for bacterial DNA sequencing. Results: There was no difference among groups about alpha diversity indices (all p>0.05), including ACE, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson indices. Principal component analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis showed a high similarity among three groups. Compared with CON group, ADY and YC groups had greater relative abundance of c_Clostridia, o_Oscillospirales, and f_Oscillospiraceae, but lesser relative abundance of g_Megasphaera, and s_Megasphaera_elsdenii (all p<0.01). And, the relative abundances of p_Firmicutes (p = 0.03), s_Prevotella_sp (p = 0.03), o_Clostridiales (p<0.01), g_Clostridium (p<0.01), f_Caloramatoraceae (p<0.01), and f_Ruminococcaceae (p = 0.04) were increased in the ADY group. The PICRUSt2 prediction results showed that the metabolic pathways had no significant differences among groups (p>0.05). Besides, the relative abundance of c_Clostridia (r = 0.42), and f_Oscillospiraceae (r = 0.40) were positively correlated to average daily gain of finishing bulls (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both of ADY and YC had no effect on diversity of fecal bacteria in finishing bulls, but the supplementation of ADY and YC can improve the large intestinal function in finishing bulls by increasing the abundance of cellulolytic bacteria and altering the abundance of lactic acid-utilizing bacteria.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. Malmuthuge N, "Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen : searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation", J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 8, pp.8~ (2017)[DOI]
  2. Van Soest PJ, "Nutritional ecology of the ruminant" (1994), Cornell University Press
  3. Godoy-Vitorino F, "Comparative analyses of foregut and hindgut bacterial communities in hoatzins and cows", ISME J, 6, pp.531~541 (2012)[DOI]
  4. Mao S, "The diversity of the fecal bacterial community and its relationship with the concentration of volatile fatty acids in the feces during subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows", BMC Vet Res, 8, pp.237~ (2012)[DOI]
  5. Ashida H, "Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier", Nat Chem Biol, 8, pp.36~45 (2011)[DOI]
  6. Shurson GC, "Yeast and yeast derivatives in feed additives and ingredients : Sources, characteristics, animal responses, and quantification methods", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 235, pp.60~76 (2018)[DOI]
  7. Geng CY, "Comparison of active dry yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)and yeast culture for growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and blood indexes in finishing bulls", Anim Sci J, 87, pp.982~988 (2016)[DOI]
  8. Swyers KL, "Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product as an alternative to monensin on growth performance, cost of gain, and carcass characteristics of heavy-weight yearling beef steers", J Anim Sci, 92, pp.2538~2545 (2014)[DOI]
  9. Hinman DD, "Effect of yeast culture on steer performance, apparent diet digestibility, and carcass measurements when used in a barley and potato finishing diet", Prof Anim Sci, 14, pp.173~177 (1998)[DOI]
  10. Geng CY, "Improved tenderness of beef from bulls supplemented with active dry yeast is related to matrix metalloproteinases and reduced oxidative stress", Animal, 16, pp.100517~ (2022)[DOI]
  11. Wiedmeier RD, "Effect of yeast culture and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal characteristics and nutrient digestibility", J Dairy Sci, 70, pp.2063~2068 (1987)[DOI]
  12. Shen Y, "Influence of yeast culture and feed antibiotics on ruminal fermentation and site and extent of digestion in beef heifers fed high grain rations", J Anim Sci, 96, pp.3916~3927 (2018)[DOI]
  13. Amin AB, "Influence of yeast on rumen fermentation, growth performance and quality of products in ruminants : a review", Anim Nutr, 7, pp.31~41 (2021)[DOI]
  14. Bach A, "Changes in the rumen and colon microbiota and effects of live yeast dietary supplementation during the transition from the dry period to lactation of dairy cows", J Dair y Sci, 102, pp.6180~6198 (2019)[DOI]
  15. Ran T, "Using ruminally protected and nonprotected active dried yeast as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers : growth performance, carcass traits, blood metabolites, and fecal Escherichia coli", J Anim Sci, 96, pp.4385~4397 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Tao Ran, "Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast", Journal of Animal Science, 98(4) (2020), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  17. Geng CY, "Comparison of blood immunity, antioxidant capacity and hormone indexes in finishing bulls fed active dry yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)and yeast culture", Int J Agric Biol, 20, pp.2561~2568 (2018)[DOI]
  18. Klemetsen T, "Full-length 16S rRNA gene classification of Atlantic salmon bacteria and effects of using different 16S variable regions on community structure analysis", Microbiology Open, 8, pp.e898~ (2019)[DOI]
  19. Yuan X, "Comparison of gut bacterial communities of grapholita molesta(Lepidoptera : Tortricidae)reared on different host plants", Int J Mol Sci, 22, pp.6843~ (2021)[DOI]
  20. Parks DH, "STAMP : statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles", Bioinformatics, 30, pp.3123~3124 (2014)[DOI]
  21. Ogunade I, "Integrating 16S rRNA sequencing and LC-MS-based metabolomics to evaluate the effects of live yeast on rumen function in beef cattle", Animals, 9, pp.28~ (2019)[DOI]
  22. Büchl NR, "Differentiation of probiotic and environmental Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in animal feed", J Appl Microbiol, 109, pp.783~791 (2010)[DOI]
  23. Vohra A, "Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 219, pp.31~47 (2016)[DOI]
  24. Jones DT, "Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited", Microbiol Rev, 50, pp.484~524 (1986)[DOI]
  25. Lewis JD, "Nutrition, gut microbiota and immunity : therapeutic targets for IBD. Concluding remarks", Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser, 79, pp.161~162 (2014)[DOI]
  26. Rivera-Chávez F, "Depletion of butyrateproducing clostridia from the gut microbiota drives an aerobic luminal expansion of salmonella", Cell Host Microbe, 19, pp.443~454 (2016)[DOI]
  27. Yale CE, "The importance of clostridia in experimental intestinal strangulation", Gastroenterology, 71, pp.793~796 (1976)[DOI]
  28. Gophna U, "Oscillospira and related bacteria-From metagenomic species to metabolic features", Environ Microbiol, 19, pp.835~841 (2017)[DOI]
  29. Mackie Roderick I, "Ecology of uncultivated oscillospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches", Appl Environ Microbiol, 69, pp.6808~6815 (2003)[DOI]
  30. Chen YR, "High Oscillospira abundance indicates constipation and low BMI in the Guangdong Gut Microbiome Project", Sci Rep, 10, pp.9364~ (2020)[DOI]
  31. Magalhães VJA, "Effect of feeding yeast culture on performance, health, and immunocompetence of dairy calves", J Dairy Sci, 91, pp.1497~1509 (2008)[DOI]
  32. Galvão KN, "Effect of feeding live yeast products to calves with failure of passive transfer on performance and patterns of antibiotic resistance in fecal Escherichia coli", Reprod Nutr Dev, 45, pp.427~440 (2005)[DOI]
  33. Ji M, "Structural and metabolic performance of p-cresol producing microbiota in different carbon sources", Food Res Int, 132, pp.109049~ (2020)[DOI]
  34. Chaucheyras-Durand F, "Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem : Past, present and future", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 145, pp.5~26 (2008)[DOI]
  35. Ogunade IM, "Effects of live yeast on differential genetic and functional attributes of rumen microbiota in beef cattle", J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 10, pp.68~ (2019)[DOI]
  36. Lesmeister KE, "Effects of supplemental yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)culture on rumen development, growth characteristics, and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves", J Dairy Sci, 87, pp.1832~1839 (2004)[DOI]
  37. Hammes WP, "The genera of lactic acid bacteria", pp.19~54 (1995), Springer US
  38. Gressley TF, "Ruminant Nutrition Symposium : Productivity, digestion, and health responses to hindgut acidosis in ruminants", J Anim Sci, 89, pp.1120~1130 (2011)
  39. Sanz-Fernandez MV, "Targeting the hindgut to improve health and performance in cattle", Animals, 10, pp.1817~ (2020)[DOI]
  40. Faniyi TO, "Role of diverse fermentative factors towards microbial community shift in ruminants", J Appl Microbiol, 127, pp.2~11 (2019)[DOI]
  41. Jami E, "Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency", PLoS One, 9, pp.e85423~ (2014)[DOI]
  42. Myer PR, "Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0129174~ (2015)[DOI]
  43. Thoetkiattikul H, "Comparative analysis of microbial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietary fiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing", Curr Microbiol, 67, pp.130~137 (2013)[DOI]
  44. Biddle A, "Untangling the genetic basis of fibrolytic specialization by lachnospiraceae and ruminococcaceae in diverse gut communities", Diversity, 5, pp.627~640 (2013)[DOI]
  45. De Filippo C, "Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, pp.14691~14696 (2010)[DOI]
  46. Liu J, "Characterization and comparison of the temporal dynamics of ruminal bacterial microbiota colonizing rice straw and alfalfa hay within ruminants", J Dairy Sci, 99, pp.9668~9681 (2016)[DOI]
  47. Geervliet M, "Effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 on the porcine gut microbiota, intestinal epithelium and immune system in early life?", Front Microbiol, 13, pp.842437~ (2022)[DOI]
  48. Mølbak L, "Identification of a novel, invasive, not-yet-cultivated treponema sp. in the large intestine of pigs by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene", J Clin Microbiol, 44, pp.4537~4540 (2006)[DOI]
  49. Schrank K, "Treponema brennaborense sp. nov., a novel spirochaete isolated from a dairy cow suffering from digital dermatitis", Int J Syst Bacteriol, 49, pp.43~50 (1999)[DOI]
  50. Seymour WM, "Effects of a colostrum substitute and of dietary brewer's yeast on the health and performance of dairy calves", J Dairy Sci, 78, pp.412~420 (1995)[DOI]
  51. Durso LM, "Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle", Appl Environ Microbiol, 76, pp.4858~4862 (2010)[DOI]
  52. Kim M, "Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets", J Anim Sci, 92, pp.683~694 (2014)[DOI]
  53. Shanks OC, "Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations", Appl Environ Microbiol, 77, pp.2992~3001 (2011)[DOI]
  54. Hernandez-Sanabria E, "Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle", Appl Environ Microbiol, 78, pp.1203~1214 (2012)[DOI]
  55. Moya A, "Functional redundancy-induced stability of gut microbiota subjected to disturbance", Trends Microbiol, 24, pp.402~413 (2016)[DOI]
  56. Groves JT, "Molecular mechanisms in signal transduction at the membrane", Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17, pp.659~665 (2010)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Ruminal pH pattern, fermentation characteristics and related bacteria in response to dietary live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in beef cattleDong Xianwen, Guan Jiuqiang, Hu Rui, Kang Kun, Luo Xiaolin, Peng Quanhui, Shah Ali Mujtaba, Wanapat Metha, Wang Zhisheng, Zhang Xiangfei아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2022 · 제35권 제2호The effect of calcium propionate on the ruminal bacterial community composition in finishing bullsQianqian Yao, Qingxiang Meng, Yan Lin, Zhenming Zhou아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2017 · 제30권 제4호Effect of active and heat-killed Clostridium butyricum on in vitro gas production, ruminal fermentation parameters, and microbiota at varying media pH levelsHu Guanghui, Jiao Peixin, Lin Xu, Liu Jincheng, Xie Xiaolai, Xin Hangshu, Zhang Xinlong, Zhang Zhiyue, Zhu Hongxu아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2026 · 제39권 제1호The impact of different diets and genders on fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle윤상, 박철주, 이후승, Hyeonsu Seon, Min-Seok Kim, Seunghyeun Sim한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2022 · 제64권 제5호Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on growth performance, fecal short chain fatty acids, and microbiota of pre-weaning calvesCheng Zhiqiang, Gong Xiaoxiao, Huo Yongjiu, Jiang Maocheng, Lei Qian, Lin Miao, Ma Qianbo아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2025 · 제38권 제5호Nicotinic acid changes rumen fermentation and apparent nutrient digestibility by regulating rumen microbiota in Xiangzhong black cattleBao Linbin, Liang Huan, Qu Mingren, Song Wanming, Yang Zhuqing, Yu Mingjin, Zhao Xianghui아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2024 · 제37권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)