본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

판별함수분석을 이용한 인하대학교 학생의 계열별 적성요인 분석

Analyzing Aptitude Factors of Inha University Students by Discriminant Function Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to find out 1) the significant predictive factors among sub-factors of a standardized aptitude test affecting college students' major and 2) the extent that their current major matches that expected by stepwise two-group discriminant function analysis. Subject was 325 Inha University students. 'The Standardized Aptitude Diagnosis Test' developed by Lee & Kim(1983) was employed as a research instrument. The findings showed that numerical, verbal, reasoning, and science and mechanical aptitude were statistically significant as predictive variables when six capacity-factors entered into discriminant function analysis. Five sub-factors - computing, verbal, reasoning, deductive reasoning, physical, and perceptual speed - were statistically significant when eleven sub-factors entered. The result of classification showed that 76.9% and 77.5% of original grouped cases were correctly classified when 5 capacity-factors and 11 sub-factors entered respectively.

Abstract

This study aimed to find out 1) the significant predictive factors among sub-factors of a standardized aptitude test affecting college students' major and 2) the extent that their current major matches that expected by stepwise two-group discriminant function analysis. Subject was 325 Inha University students. 'The Standardized Aptitude Diagnosis Test' developed by Lee & Kim(1983) was employed as a research instrument. The findings showed that numerical, verbal, reasoning, and science and mechanical aptitude were statistically significant as predictive variables when six capacity-factors entered into discriminant function analysis. Five sub-factors - computing, verbal, reasoning, deductive reasoning, physical, and perceptual speed - were statistically significant when eleven sub-factors entered. The result of classification showed that 76.9% and 77.5% of original grouped cases were correctly classified when 5 capacity-factors and 11 sub-factors entered respectively.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)