대학생의 학습 유형 진단도구 개발 및 타당화 연구
The Development and Validation of a Learning Type Measurement of University students
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 학습환경의 변화를 고려하여 학습자의 학습방법과 과정을 중심으로 학습 유형 진단도구를 개발하고타당화하는 것이다. 이를 위해 학습스타일 도구인 VARK와 다양한 영역의 역량을 측정하는 Bloom의 디지털 텍사노미를바탕으로 하여 교육공학 전문가의 검토를 거쳐, 55개의 문항으로 이루어진 예비 학습 진단도구를 개발하였다. 개발한도구를 사용하여 편의표집한 125명의 대학생을 대상으로 예비조사를 실시하였다. 이를 토대로 탐색적 요인분석을실시하여 요인부하량이 적절하지 않은 14개의 문항을 제외한 41개 문항을 본 조사를 위한 최종문항으로 선정하였다. 이후에 전국 대학생 232명을 대상으로 데이터를 얻고, 해당 데이터로 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 측정모형의적합도 및 신뢰도 확인 결과, 본 도구는 대학생의 학습스타일과 역량을 진단하기에 타당한 것으로 확인되었다. 본연구는 대학생 학습자의 학습강화를 위한 기초자료 제공의 수단으로 활용될 수 있다는데 의의가 있으며, 후속 연구를위한 제언을 제시하였다.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to develop a scale for measuring learning type in considering a learning style and competency. In order to develop the measurement instrument, the fifty-five items were developed based on the VARK and Bloom’s digital taxonomy. The survey was conducted among university students. With the data of 125 sample size from the first survey, the Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted. In order to validate the Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed with 232 respondents from the second survey. Through the research, 14 items deleted from a scale and 41 items were developed for a learning style and competency assessment instrument. In conclusion, the scale is confirmed in its reliability and validity for measuring a learning style and competency. And the scale is expected to use for increasing the learning skills of university students.
참고문헌 (38)
- 권성연, "대학생의 Gregorc학습양식과 학습전략 사용 및 교수방법선호의 관계 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(2), pp.35~57 (2009), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 김종두, "대학생 학습 진단 검사도구 개발", 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 9(2), pp.185~191 (2015), 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회
- 2018 청소년 통계, "여성가족부", ~ (2018)
- 양승원, "대학생 학습역량모형 및 학습역량 검사도구 개발 연구" (2014), 한국연구재단
- 이정미, "대학생의 자기주도적 학습역량에 대한 영향요인 분석", 교육행정학연구, 35(3), pp.133~153 (2017), 한국교육행정학회
- 이혜원, "대학생용 정의적․사회적 학습양식 진단도구 개발 및 타당화", 아시아교육연구, 14(3), pp.209~229 (2013), 교육연구소[DOI]
- 任昌宰, "학습양식을 형성하는 가정환경의 과정변인 탐색", 박사, 교육학, pp.1994
- 하지훈, "초등학생의 VARK 학습양식과 과학적 의사소통 능력의 관계", 초등과학교육, 33(4), pp.724~735 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 홍세희, "구조 방성식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거", 한국심리학회지 : 임상, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)
- Aldosari, M. A., "Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, evaluated using the VARK questionnaire", Advances in medical education and practice, 9, pp.179~186 (2018)
- Anderson, L. W., "A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy" (2001), Longman Publishing
- Artz, AF, "Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups", Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), pp.137~175 (1992)
- Balasubramaniam, G., "A Study of Learning Style Preferences among First Year Undergraduate Medical Students Using VARK Model", Education in Medicine Journal, 8(4), pp.15~21 (2016)
- Bloom, B. S., "Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain" (1956), McKay
- Churches, A., "Bloom's taxonomy blooms digitally", Tech & Learning, 1, pp.1~6 (2008)
- Duff, A., "The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its use in management education", Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), pp.56~72 (2004)
- Dunn, R. S., "Learning style inventory" (1979), Price Systems
- Felder, R. M., "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education", Engineering Education, 78(7), pp.674~681 (1988)
- Fitkov-Norris, E. D., "Validation of VARK learning modalities questionnaire using Rasch analysis", Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 588(1), pp.012048~ (2015), IOP Publishing
- Fleming, N. D., "Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies" (2001), IGI Global
- Fleming, N., "Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree!", Educational Developments, 7(4), pp.4~7 (2006)
- Fleming, N. D., "Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection", To Improve the Academy, 11(1), pp.137~155 (1992)
- Gregorc, A. F., "Gregorc style delineator" (1982), Gabriel Systems
- Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2009), Pearson Education, Inc
- Hawk, T. F., "Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning", Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), pp.1~19 (2007)
- Kaiser, H. F., "The application of electronic computers to factor analysis", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), pp.141~151 (1960)
- Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39(1), pp.31~36 (1974)
- Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2015), Guilford publications
- Kolb, D. A., "Learning style inventory technical manual" (1976), McBer
- Kolb, A. Y., "Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education", Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), pp.193~212 (2005)
- Krathwohl, D. R., "A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview", Theory Into Practice, 41(4), pp.212~218 (2002)
- Li, M., "The relationship between Kolb's experiential learning styles and Big Five personality traits in international managers", Personality and Individual Differences, 86, pp.422~426 (2015)
- Morton, D. A., "Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy", Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(2), pp.170~175 (2017)
- Pashler, H., "Learning styles: Concepts and evidence", Psychological Science in The Public Interest, 9(3), pp.105~119 (2008)
- Scott, T., "Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes", Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19(1), pp.267~274 (2003)
- Thomdike, R. L., "Intelligence tests: What we have and what we should have", Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists (1992)
- Thompson, E., "Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment", Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education, 78, pp.155~161 (2008), Australian Computer Society, Inc.
- Whittington, M. S., "Learning and teaching styles of student teachers in the northwest", Journal of Agricultural Education, 36(4), pp.10~17 (1995)