본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study of Teaching and Learning Model Development for Engineering Education

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The purpose of this study is to develop a teaching and learning model for the field of engineering to nurture innovative thinking and competency in engineering elites of the next generation. We have reviewed the literature to find out the necessary thinking and capabilities required for the next-generation engineers, and analyzing domestic and international case studies. As a result, we have created Scientific Inquiry and Creative Activity with Technology (SICAT) as a teaching and learning model applicable for the Fusion Materials field. SICAT model is classified ARDA, CoCD, ReSh type to apply directly in class according to teaching and learning objective. And we developed SICAT teaching and learning model guidebook for teachers. In near future, It should be consolidated the validity of the model and improved succeedingly in engineering education through applying and analyzing effectiveness in classes.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a teaching and learning model for the field of engineering to nurture innovative thinking and competency in engineering elites of the next generation. We have reviewed the literature to find out the necessary thinking and capabilities required for the next-generation engineers, and analyzing domestic and international case studies. As a result, we have created Scientific Inquiry and Creative Activity with Technology (SICAT) as a teaching and learning model applicable for the Fusion Materials field. SICAT model is classified ARDA, CoCD, ReSh type to apply directly in class according to teaching and learning objective. And we developed SICAT teaching and learning model guidebook for teachers. In near future, It should be consolidated the validity of the model and improved succeedingly in engineering education through applying and analyzing effectiveness in classes.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Bankel, J. Berggren, K., "The CDIO syllabus: A Comparative study of expected student proficiency", European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), pp.297~315 (2002)
  2. "An inquiry and blended learning module for senior engineering design"[URL]
  3. Foulds, R. A., "Integrated biomedical engineering education using studio-based learning", IEEE Engineering in medicine and biology magazine, 22(4), pp.92~100 (2003)
  4. "Problembased learning biotechnology courses in chemical engineering"[URL]
  5. Kim, D. Y., "A study on the Constituents of Engineering Basic Competency based on the Recognition of Engineers in the Field", Journal of Korean Society for Engineering Education, 9(2), pp.34~51 (2006)
  6. 권성호, "해외 공학교육 사례분석을 통한 교수학습 전략 탐색", 공학교육연구, 11(3), pp.12~23 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  7. Kwon, S. H, "SICAT teaching and learning model guidebook for teachers" (2008), Institute of Educational Technology, Hanyang University
  8. Meyer, "Capstone design outcome assessment: Instruments for quantitative evaluation", 35th ASEE, 2005, ~
  9. Paretti, M., "Using project portfolios to assess design in materials science and engineering", Proceedings of the 2005 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition (2005)
  10. Paretti, M, "Integrating engineering and communication: A study of capstone design course", 35th ASEE, 2005, ~
  11. Saunders, K., "Using rubrics to facilitate students' development of problem solving skills", Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)