Theoretical Foundation of the Maker Movement for Education: Learning Theories and Pedagogy of the Maker Movement
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The author investigated the momentum of the maker movement and its educational implications with the following four research questions: 1. What is the maker movement? 2. What is the nature of our societal interest in the maker movement? 3. Which learning theories are associated with the maker movement? 4. What are the educational implications of the maker movement? The author reviewed the history of education in terms of the maker movement and concluded that Papert’s learning-by-making approach provided a theoretical foundation of the maker movement. The maker movement aims to engage participants in Do-It-Yourself(DIY) activities, the spirit of tinkering, and a hands-on approach. Also, the maker movement meets the educational demands of fostering students’ 21st-century abilities and technological literacy. Lastly, the author anticipated the issues that may arise following the introduction of the maker movement in K-12 schools. In conclusion, the author discussed the challenges of the school maker education movement and suggested the bottom-up approach to utilize the school resources of technology and engineering education.
Abstract
The author investigated the momentum of the maker movement and its educational implications with the following four research questions: 1. What is the maker movement? 2. What is the nature of our societal interest in the maker movement? 3. Which learning theories are associated with the maker movement? 4. What are the educational implications of the maker movement? The author reviewed the history of education in terms of the maker movement and concluded that Papert’s learning-by-making approach provided a theoretical foundation of the maker movement. The maker movement aims to engage participants in Do-It-Yourself(DIY) activities, the spirit of tinkering, and a hands-on approach. Also, the maker movement meets the educational demands of fostering students’ 21st-century abilities and technological literacy. Lastly, the author anticipated the issues that may arise following the introduction of the maker movement in K-12 schools. In conclusion, the author discussed the challenges of the school maker education movement and suggested the bottom-up approach to utilize the school resources of technology and engineering education.
참고문헌 (44)
- Bevan, B., "Tinkering is serious play", Educational Leadership, 72(4), pp.28~33 (2014)
- Billett S., "Learning Through Practice", pp.59~81 (2010), Springer
- Blikstein, P., "Fab Labs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors" (2013), Transcript Publishers
- Blikstein, P., "Handbook of Technology Education" (2017), Springer International Publishing
- Burke, J., "Making sense: Can makerspaces work in academic libraries?", ACRL Conference Proceedings (2015)
- Christiaans, H. H. C. M., "Creativity in design: the role of domain knowledge in designing" (1992), Uitgeverij LEMMA BV
- Clough, G. W., "The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century" (2004), National Academy of Engineering
- Dewey, J., "The Philosophy of John Dewey", pp.483~493 (1916), University of Chicago Press
- Dewey, J., "Experience and education" (2007), Simon and Schuster
- Dorst, K., "Creativity in the design process:co-evolution of problem–solution", Design Studies, 22(5), pp.425~437 (2001)
- Dougherty, D., "The maker movement", Innovations, 7(3), pp.11~14 (2012)
- Dougherty, D., "Free to make: how the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds" (2016), North Atlantic Books
- Fleming, L., "Worlds of making: Best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school" (2015), Corwin Press
- Ferrarin, A., "Homo faber, homo sapiens, or homo politicus? Protagoras and the myth of Prometheus", The Review of Metaphysics, 54(2), pp.289~319 (2000)
- Hager, P., "The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education", pp.271~287 (2003), Blackwell Publishing Limited
- Hakim, L., "Object Lessons: Making, knowing, and growing things", Huntington Library Quarterly, 78(1), pp.127~136 (2015)
- Halverson, E. R., "The maker movement in education", Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), pp.495~504 (2014)
- Morgan M. Hynes, "If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), pp.867~883 (2018), Springer Nature[DOI]
- International Technology Education Association(ITEA, "Standards for technological literacy:Content for the study of technology", pp.ITEEA), ITEEA)
- Kelley, T. R., "Design fixation", Engineering Technology Teacher, 77(3), pp.15~19 (2017)
- Kuznetsov, S., "Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures", Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction:Extending Boundaries, pp.295~304 (2010), ACM
- "New Commitments in Support of the President’s Nation of Makers Initiative to Kick Off 2016 National Week of Making" (2016)[URL]
- "Fast fact: Maker faire global 2016" (2016)[URL]
- Martin, L., "The promise of the maker movement for education", Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 5(1), pp.30~39 (2015)
- Mikhak, B., "Fab Lab: an alternate model of ICT for development", 2nd International Conference on Open Collaborative Design for Sustainable Innovation (2002)
- National Education Association, "Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.”" (2012), National Education Association
- National Research Council, "Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology" (2002), National Academies Press
- Nodding, N., "Philosophy of education" (2011), Westview Press
- Papert, S., "Mindstorms : Children, computers, and powerful ideas" (1980), Basic Books
- Peppler, K., "Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time", Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), pp.22~27 (2013)
- Resnick, M., "Scratch : programming for all", Communications of the ACM, 52(11), pp.60~67 (2009)
- Rousseau, J. J., "A discourse on inequality" (1984), Penguin
- Ryu, C., "Foundation of technology education" (2000), Chungnam National University Press
- Mark Sanders, "New Paradigm or Old Wine? The Status of Technology Education Practice in the United States", Journal of Technology Education, 12(2) (2001), Virginia Tech Libraries[DOI]
- Sanders, M., "STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania", The Technology Teacher, 68(4), pp.20~26 (2009)
- Schon, S., "The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching", Learning Papers, 39, pp.14~25 (2014)
- Sheppard, S. D., "Educating engineers : Designing for the future of the field(Vol. 2" (2008), Jossey-Bass
- Tanenbaum, J. G., "Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.2603~2612 (2013), ACM
- Thomasian, J., "Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda: An update of state actions" (2011), National Governors Association Center for Best Practices
- Tudge, J., "Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development", Human Development, 36, pp.61~81 (1993)
- Vygotsky, L., "Interaction between learning and development", Readings on the development of children, 23(3), pp.34~41 (1978)
- Watson, M., "Product, competence, project and practice : DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption", Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), pp.69~89 (2008)
- Weber, K., "Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods", Journal of technology education, 16(2), pp.55~71 (2005)