ChatGPT가 한국 공학교육에 던지는 질문: 그 의미와 과제
ChatGPT’s Questions for Korean Engineering Education: Implications and Challenges
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Generative AI has arrived and it’s here. Education, research, industry, and labor are all on edge about the changes it will bring. It is noteworthy that while there is a wide range of optimistic and pessimistic predictions about the impact of generative AI, there is more concern than hope when it comes to education. This paper focuses on the lack of discussion on the impact of AI in higher education. First, we reviewed the process of the emergence of generative AI and introduced how the impact of AI is being understood from various perspectives. Second, we classified work areas based on expertise and efficiency and analyzed the impact of AI on work in each area. Finally, the study found that the educational perception of generative AI and the way it is perceived for engineering education purposes can be very different. It also argued that there is a lack of active discussion and debate on areas that need to be specifically discussed around generative AI. This has led to a phenomenon known as professors’ delayed indifference. We emphasized that it is time for a serious and realistic discussion on the connection and integration of AI and education.
Abstract
Generative AI has arrived and it’s here. Education, research, industry, and labor are all on edge about the changes it will bring. It is noteworthy that while there is a wide range of optimistic and pessimistic predictions about the impact of generative AI, there is more concern than hope when it comes to education. This paper focuses on the lack of discussion on the impact of AI in higher education. First, we reviewed the process of the emergence of generative AI and introduced how the impact of AI is being understood from various perspectives. Second, we classified work areas based on expertise and efficiency and analyzed the impact of AI on work in each area. Finally, the study found that the educational perception of generative AI and the way it is perceived for engineering education purposes can be very different. It also argued that there is a lack of active discussion and debate on areas that need to be specifically discussed around generative AI. This has led to a phenomenon known as professors’ delayed indifference. We emphasized that it is time for a serious and realistic discussion on the connection and integration of AI and education.
참고문헌 (40)
- 강미량, "자율보행체(自律步行體): 인간과 로봇이 함께 생성하고 분배하는 자율성에 대하여", 과학기술학연구, 21(3), pp.98~138 (2021), 한국과학기술학회
- 권오남, "ChatGPT의 수학적 성능 분석: 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 및 대학수학능력시험 수학 문제 풀이를 중심으로", 수학교육 논문집, 37(2), pp.233~256 (2023), 한국수학교육학회[DOI]
- 김초엽, "사이보그가 되다" (2021), 사계절
- 박서연, "챗GPT시대의 교육, “‘읽기’와 ‘쓰기’의순서가 뒤바뀐다.”", 미디어오늘, ~ (2023)
- 백목원, "인공지능(AI)을 활용한 국어 수업 방안 연구", 청람어문교육, (84), pp.7~39 (2021), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- 금융업의 인공지능 활용과 정책과제. KIF 정책분석보고서, "서정호", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2022)
- 이상철, "생성형 인공지능이 가져올 로펌의 지형변화", 법률신문(2023.7.17), ~ (2023)
- 이송렬, "챗GPT 도입했더니...아파트 하자 처리 속도 ‘쑥’", 한국경제, ~ (2023)
- 정의길, "AI가 일자리 3억 개 대체한다...그래도 사람 손필요한 직업은", 한겨레신문, ~ (2023)
- 정한별, "Reinventing Education with Technology:EDTech and Education Policy in South Korea", 박사, pp.2023
- 조헌국, "텍스트 기반 생성형 인공지능의 이해와 과학교육에서의 활용에 대한 논의", 한국과학교육학회지, 43(3), pp.307~319 (2023), 한국과학교육학회
- Anson, C. M., "Amazement and trepidation : Implications of AI-based natural language production for the teaching of writing", Journal of Academic Writing, 12(1), pp.1~9 (2022)
- Arora A., "Generative adversarial networks and synthetic patient data : current challenges and future perspectives", Future Healthc J, 9(2), pp.190~193 (2022)
- Atkinson, Katie, "Explanation in AI and Law : Past, Present, and Future", Artificial Intelligence, 289 (2020)[DOI]
- "OpenAI GPT-3: Everything you need to know" (2021)[URL]
- Crawford, K., "There is a blind spot in AI Research", Nature, 538, pp.311~313 (2016)
- "Machines can craft essays. How should writing be taught now?" (2022)[URL]
- Dowling, M., "ChatGPT for (finance)research: The Bananarama conjecture", Preprint, ~ (2023)
- FLI, "FLI on “A Statement on AI Risk” and Next Steps", Future of Life Institute, ~ (2023)
- Frieder, S., "Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT", Preprint. arXiv:2301.13867, ~ (2023)
- Fyfe, P., "How to cheat on your final paper:Assigning AI for student writing", AI & Society, pp.1~11 (2022)
- Gordijn, B., "ChatGPT : evolution or revolution?", Med Health Care and Philos, 26, pp.1~2 (2023)
- HAI, "Generative AI: Perspectives from Stanford HAI", Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, ~ (2023)
- Haleem, Abid., "Current Status and Applications of Artificial Intelligence(AI)in Medical Field : An Overview", Current Medicine Research and Practice, 9(6), pp.231~237 (2019)
- "Plagiarism, Quality, and Correctness of ChatGPT-Generated vs Human-Written Abstract for Research Paper" (2023)[URL]
- Ian Sample, "Science Journals Ban Listing of ChatGPT as Co-Author on Papers", The Guardian, ~ (2023)
- "Teaching: Will ChatGPT change the way you teach?" (2023)[URL]
- Metzler, D., "Rethinking search : making domain experts out of dilettantes", ACM SIGIR Forum, 55(1), pp.1~27 (2021)[DOI]
- Mills, A., "How do we prevent learning loss due to AI text generators?", Blog post, ~ (2023)
- "The robots are coming! The robots are coming! Nah, the robots are here" (2022)[URL]
- Patel, S. B., "ChatGPT : the future of discharge summaries?", Lancet Digit Health, 5(3), pp.107~108 (2023)[DOI]
- Prensky, M., "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1", On the Horizon, 9(5), pp.3~6 (2001)
- "Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education" (2022)[URL]
- Rudolph, Jurgen, "ChatGPT : Bullshit Spewer of the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?", Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), pp.1~22 (2023)
- Luis M. Sánchez-Ruiz, "ChatGPT Challenges Blended Learning Methodologies in Engineering Education: A Case Study in Mathematics", Applied Sciences, 13(10), pp.6039~ (2023), MDPI AG[DOI]
- Sharples, M., "Automated essay writing : An AIED opinion", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), pp.1119~1126 (2022)
- Shaw, David, "The(Mis)Use of ChatGPT in Science and Education", EMBO Reports, 24(7) (2023)
- Stokel-Walker, Chris, "What ChatGPT and Generative AI mean for Science", Nature, 614, pp.214~216 (2023)[DOI]
- Thorp H. Holden, "ChatGPT is fun, but not an author", Science, 313 (2023)
- Weber-Wulff, D., "Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text", Preprint. arXiv:2306.15666, ~ (2023)