본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

가습기살균제 참사에 관한 학술연구의 비판적 검토와 다양한 관점의 이해

Critical Reviews of Academic Research and Perspectives for Understanding the Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to help develop a comprehensive understanding of the humidifier disinfectant disaster from diverse perspectives based on a critical review of the relevant academic research papers published so far in the fields of both natural and social science. The authors reviewed pertinent articles in the six academic areas of law, social science, humanities, medicine, toxicology, and environmental health. A proper understanding of the issue of humidifier disinfectant is a challenging task because diverse aspects of it have become related over the more than two decades since such products were first released to the market in 1994. Technical and esoteric issues such as the complex system for relief and compensation for health damages and the approval of chemical toxicity are known to be major impediments to viewing the bigger picture regarding this tragedy. The authors believe that experts need to consider a comprehensive perspective going beyond their individual research arena to gain a better understanding of this issue, especially since it was an alarm signal on ethics and the role of experts and scholars in Korean society. Besides the two professors arrested by the prosecutor’s office, it should be remembered that medical doctors recommended patients use humidifiers and disinfectants, and the media was inactive in reporting on this issue. Furthermore, the current paucity of examination of the social and political implications of this tragedy calls for more active engagement by researchers in the humanities and social sciences. In this regard, this paper is a work of self-examination and self-criticism by the authors that could resonate with the overall academic community.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to help develop a comprehensive understanding of the humidifier disinfectant disaster from diverse perspectives based on a critical review of the relevant academic research papers published so far in the fields of both natural and social science. The authors reviewed pertinent articles in the six academic areas of law, social science, humanities, medicine, toxicology, and environmental health. A proper understanding of the issue of humidifier disinfectant is a challenging task because diverse aspects of it have become related over the more than two decades since such products were first released to the market in 1994. Technical and esoteric issues such as the complex system for relief and compensation for health damages and the approval of chemical toxicity are known to be major impediments to viewing the bigger picture regarding this tragedy. The authors believe that experts need to consider a comprehensive perspective going beyond their individual research arena to gain a better understanding of this issue, especially since it was an alarm signal on ethics and the role of experts and scholars in Korean society. Besides the two professors arrested by the prosecutor’s office, it should be remembered that medical doctors recommended patients use humidifiers and disinfectants, and the media was inactive in reporting on this issue. Furthermore, the current paucity of examination of the social and political implications of this tragedy calls for more active engagement by researchers in the humanities and social sciences. In this regard, this paper is a work of self-examination and self-criticism by the authors that could resonate with the overall academic community.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Ahn J-J, "Breath taken away" (2016), Hanul
  2. Kim S, "Chemicals, dangerous secrets", pp.174~231 (2017), Podobat
  3. Hong-Jung K, "Sociological Pa-sang-ryok", pp.142~165 (2016), Munhakdonge
  4. 박정일, "행정규제부작위와 국가배상", 법과정책, 18(1), pp.145~165 (2012), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
  5. Shin H-E, "A study on the legislation of chemical safety and remedy system in public law: especially focusing on chemical products for household such as humidifier disinfectant", pp.2016
  6. 이상만, "생명 및 신체의 안전에 대한 국가의 보호의무 - 가습기 살균제 피해사건과 일본 센난 석면사건의 판결을 중심으로 -", 의생명과학과법, 15, pp.35~71 (2016), 법학연구소
  7. Kim J, "Kausalität bei den Unterlassungsdelikten", pp.2017
  8. 김정현, "집단적 의사결정의 부작위적 접근 - 다중적 인과관계를 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 20(2), pp.1~26 (2018), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
  9. 정남순, "가습기 살균제를 통해 본 화학물질관리제도의 현황과 문제점에 대한 고찰", 환경법과 정책, 11, pp.35~56 (2013), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  10. 김은정, "화학제품 안전관리를 위한 법제도적 개선방안 연구", 의생명과학과법, 16, pp.119~153 (2016), 법학연구소
  11. 장영철, "독일의 제품안전법에 대한 고찰 - 우리에의 시사점과 관련하여 -", 서울법학, 24(3), pp.1~38 (2016), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
  12. 박종원, "가습기살균제 사건에 비추어 본 화학물질 리스크 평가·관리법제의 문제점과 개선방안", 한양법학, 28(2), pp.91~112 (2017), 한양법학회
  13. Lee EJ, "A Study on Consumer Chemicals and Product Liability -Focusing on Defects and Causal Relations", Journal of Small and Medium Business Law, 8(2), pp.121~140 (2017)
  14. 윤익준, "공동불법행위의 책임분배와 시장점유율 책임이론 - 화학물질 피해구제와 관련하여 -", 법과정책연구, 14(4), pp.2095~2119 (2014), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
  15. 이현욱, "가습기살균제 사건에 있어서 환경소송에서 발전한 인과관계 증명책임 완화 법리의 적용 ― 대법원의 증명책임 완화 적용요건 검토를 중심으로 ―", 환경법연구, 38(1), pp.89~114 (2016), 한국환경법학회
  16. 송정은, "가습기 살균제 사건의 민사적 쟁점: 제조물책임과 인과관계 입증", 환경법과 정책, 16, pp.1~33 (2016), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  17. 이재목, "악의적 제조물사고에 있어 위자료 증액론과 징벌배상제도 도입론의 우열 - 가습기살균제 사건을 계기로 -", 홍익법학, 17(3), pp.167~193 (2016), 법학연구소[DOI]
  18. 박태현, "가습기살균제 사건과 법적과제: 피해구제시스템 개선을 중심으로", 환경법과 정책, 20, pp.87~125 (2018), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  19. Sun K-I, "Problems of Humidifier Disinfectant Case and Punitive Damages", KHU Global Business Law Review, 11, pp.35~61 (2018)
  20. 김태선, "소비자보호를 위한 배액배상제도의 기능과 운용", 중앙법학, 20(3), pp.131~162 (2018), 중앙법학회[DOI]
  21. 이정훈, "국내 언론의 가습기 살균제 참사에 대한 보도 경향 분석", ECO, 20(2), pp.351~398 (2016), 한국환경사회학회
  22. 김수미, "포스트-진실(post-truth)시대 무지 생산의 문화정치: 가습기 살균제 피해 사건에 대한 언론 보도 분석을 중심으로", 언론과 사회, 26(3), pp.5~59 (2018), 사단법인 언론과 사회
  23. Kim J, "Humidifier disinfectant disaster from the perspective of discourse coalition theory", Master, pp.2017
  24. 구연상, "가습기살균제 사건, 재난(참사)인가 악행인가", 동서철학연구, (89), pp.495~517 (2018), 한국동서철학회[DOI]
  25. Lee JY, "The Oxy disaster, media coverage, and its meaning and discussion structure - A Semiotic study on News coverages of KBS TV and SBS TV", Master, pp.2018
  26. 공혜정, "가습기 살균제 연구의 배후에 있는 재정적 이해상충에 대한 비판적 검토- 미국대학의 경우와 비교를 통하여 –", 생명윤리정책연구, 9(3), pp.1~43 (2016), 생명의료법연구소[DOI]
  27. 홍성욱, "가습기살균제 참사와 관료적 조직 문화", 과학기술학연구, 18(1), pp.63~127 (2018), 한국과학기술학회[DOI]
  28. 김지원, "누가 ‘진짜 피해자’인가?: 가습기 살균제 참사에서 피해자 범주의 구성", 비교문화연구, 23(2), pp.5~51 (2017), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
  29. Kim J, "Life After ‘Humidifier Disinfectant’: Parents’becoming victims in a risk society", Master, pp.2018
  30. 권수영, "국가 재난 피해자 보상 및 지원에서의 상담의 역할과 전망 : 2017년 ‘가습기살균제 피해자 심리상담’ 사업을 중심으로", 한국기독교상담학회지, 29(1), pp.9~34 (2018), 한국기독교상담심리학회[DOI]
  31. 박준형, "사회적 재난에 대한 트위터 여론 수렴 모델: ‘가습기 살균제’ 사건을 중심으로", 정보처리학회 논문지, 6(4), pp.177~184 (2017), 한국정보처리학회[DOI]
  32. 박은아, "누가 불매운동에 참여하는가?: 기업의 비윤리적 사건에 대한 불매운동 참여의도 형성요인에 관한 구조모형 연구", 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 19(1), pp.121~138 (2018), 한국소비자·광고심리학회[DOI]
  33. 고대균, "텍스트분석을 활용한 생활화학제품의 위험에 대한 소비자 인식: 가습기살균제 사건을 중심으로", 소비자정책교육연구, 14(3), pp.141~167 (2018), 한국소비자정책교육학회[DOI]
  34. Kim HJ, "A cluster of lung injury cases associated with home humidifier use: an epidemiological investigation", Thorax, 69(8), pp.703~708 (2014)
  35. Park J-H, "Humidifier disinfectants are a cause of lung injury among adults in South Korea:a community-based case-control study", J PLoS One, 11(3), pp.e0151849~ (2016)
  36. Paek D, "Nationwide Study of Humidifier Disinfectant Lung Injury in South Korea, 1994-2011. Incidence and Dose-Response Relationships", Ann Am Thorac Soc. Dec, 12(12), pp.1813~1821 (2015)
  37. Koo HJ, "Humidifier disinfectant-associated lung injury in adults: Prognostic factors in predicting short-term outcome", Eur Radiol, 27(1), pp.203~211 (2017)
  38. 허진원, "Inhalation Lung Injury Associated with Humidifier Disinfectants in Adults", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(12), pp.1857~1862 (2016), 대한의학회
  39. 이은, "Two Cases of Chloromethylisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone-associated Toxic Lung Injury", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(16), pp.1~8 (2018), 대한의학회
  40. Li G, "First case of acute respiratory distress syndrome and alimentary tract hemorrhage following mass ingestion of methylisothiazolinone", Drug and chemical toxicology, 42(3), pp.317~320 (2019)
  41. Kim WY, "Lung function in patients with lung injury due to household chemical inhalation: Post hoc analysis of a prospective nationwide cohort", Respirology, 22(2), pp.345~351 (2017)
  42. 유선영, "Psychological Responses among Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster Victims and Their Families", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(4), pp.1~6 (2019), 대한의학회
  43. Yoon J, "Rate of humidifier and humidifier disinfectant usage in Korean children: A nationwide epidemiologic study", Environ Res, 155, pp.60~63 (2017)
  44. 이경무, "가습기 살균제 노출 및 건강피해 규모 평가 연구", 한국환경보건학회지, 45(3), pp.273~284 (2019), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  45. 류현수, "가습기살균제 사용에 따른 피해 신청자들의 특성 및 노출평가 오류 영향요인 분석", 한국환경보건학회지, 45(1), pp.71~81 (2019), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  46. Park DU, "Types of household humidifier disinfectant and associated risk of lung injury (HDLI) in South Korea", Sci Total Environ, 596-597, pp.53~60 (2017)
  47. 박동욱, "가습기 살균제 건강 피해 조사에서 노출 평가 방법 고찰", 한국환경보건학회지, 44(2), pp.107~114 (2018), 한국환경보건학회
  48. 최윤형, "가습기살균제 피해 신청자들의 인구학적 특성 및 노출평가 - 4-1차와 4-2차 신청자를 중심으로 -", 한국환경보건학회지, 44(4), pp.301~314 (2018), 한국환경보건학회
  49. 박동욱, "가습기 살균제 피해자 호흡기로 흡입된 가습기 살균제 양 추정 - 호흡기 외부(external) 및 내부 노출(internal exposure) 추정 방법과 사례 -", 한국환경보건학회지, 42(3), pp.141~146 (2016), 한국환경보건학회
  50. Kim J-Y, "Social science after 4.16 Sewol ferry disaster" (2016), Greenbee

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)