본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

가습기살균제 참사에 대한 사회적 해법의 모색

Searching for Social Solution of Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Eight years have passed since the Korean government’s medical agency officially reported that the fatal lung disease found in some hospitals in 2011 was caused by chemical disinfectants used in household humidifiers, marking the introduction of the humidifier disinfectant disaster. Over the past eight years, a medical-scientific approach has been taken by the Korean government in its efforts to solve the problems in terms of relief of and compensation for the potential victims. One of the unintended consequence of this approach has been the fact that the number of “official victims” recognized by the government is quite small compared to the total number of applicants who claim to be suffering from the humidifier disinfectant disaster. This is mainly due to the fact that the medical-scientific approach relies on excessively strict, rigid, and narrow medical-scientific criteria provided by medical experts for judging the degree of applicants’ bodily damage from the use of humidifier disinfectants. As a result, this medical-scientific approach is becoming increasingly criticized by patients’ organizations mainly composed of rejected applicants. Based on the analysis of the limits of this medicalscientific approach and after clarifying the social implications of the disaster from a sociological perspective, this paper proposes certain social approaches focused on participatory governance as a means of dealing with the current issue. Finally, the paper emphasizes that the act of taking social responses to the humidifier disinfectant disaster should also be considered a process of enlarging and deepening democracy in Korea.

Abstract

Eight years have passed since the Korean government’s medical agency officially reported that the fatal lung disease found in some hospitals in 2011 was caused by chemical disinfectants used in household humidifiers, marking the introduction of the humidifier disinfectant disaster. Over the past eight years, a medical-scientific approach has been taken by the Korean government in its efforts to solve the problems in terms of relief of and compensation for the potential victims. One of the unintended consequence of this approach has been the fact that the number of “official victims” recognized by the government is quite small compared to the total number of applicants who claim to be suffering from the humidifier disinfectant disaster. This is mainly due to the fact that the medical-scientific approach relies on excessively strict, rigid, and narrow medical-scientific criteria provided by medical experts for judging the degree of applicants’ bodily damage from the use of humidifier disinfectants. As a result, this medical-scientific approach is becoming increasingly criticized by patients’ organizations mainly composed of rejected applicants. Based on the analysis of the limits of this medicalscientific approach and after clarifying the social implications of the disaster from a sociological perspective, this paper proposes certain social approaches focused on participatory governance as a means of dealing with the current issue. Finally, the paper emphasizes that the act of taking social responses to the humidifier disinfectant disaster should also be considered a process of enlarging and deepening democracy in Korea.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. "Special Investigation Commission on Humidifier Disinfectants and 4.16 Sewol Ferry Disasters. 2019Briefing Materials for Humidifier Disinfectants Disaster", ~ (2018)
  2. Ahn JJ, "Stolen Breath" (2016), Hanul
  3. Lee GY, "A Report of Humidifier Disinfectant" (2016), Joongang Books
  4. 홍성욱, "가습기살균제 참사와 관료적 조직 문화", 과학기술학연구, 18(1), pp.63~127 (2018), 한국과학기술학회[DOI]
  5. White Paper on the Humidifier Disinfectant Health Damage, "Committee for Lung Injury Investigation of Center for Disease Control of Ministry of Health and Welfare", ~ (2014)
  6. 최예용, "가습기살균제 참사의 진행과 교훈(Q&A)", 한국환경보건학회지, 43(1), pp.1~22 (2017), 한국환경보건학회
  7. Miyamoto K, "Redress for damages by environmental pollution and the issue of regional revitalization -mainly about Minamata disease", Proceedings of the 3rd International Forum on Environmental Pollution and Social Impacts (2019)
  8. Jang GS, "Compressed modernity and complex risk society", Comparative Society, pp.377~414 (1998)
  9. 노진철, "압축적 근대화'와 구조화된 위험", 경제와 사회, (61), pp.208~231 (2004), 비판사회학회
  10. Lee BC, "Anticommunist dictatorship and onrushing industralization : the dilemma of the ‘Wonder of Han River’", Citizen and the World, 8, pp.115~138 (2006)
  11. 이영희, "과학기술 시티즌십의 두 유형과 전문성의 정치 과학기술 대중화 정책과 ‘차일드세이브’의 활동을 중심으로", 동향과 전망, (92), pp.174~211 (2014), 한국사회과학연구회
  12. 송성수, "“전(全)국민의 과학화운동”의 출현과 쇠퇴", 한국과학사학회지, 30(1), pp.171~212 (2008), 한국과학사학회
  13. Michaels D, "Doubt is Their Product" (2009), Imago
  14. Beck U, "Risk Society" (1997), Saemulgyul
  15. 최예용, "가습기살균제 피해사건과 교훈", 한국환경보건학회지, 38(02), pp.166~174 (2012), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  16. 박태현, "가습기살균제 사건과 법적과제: 피해구제시스템 개선을 중심으로", 환경법과 정책, 20, pp.87~125 (2018), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  17. Fischer, F, "Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry" (2009), Oxford University
  18. 이영희, "전문성의 정치와 사회운동 의미와 유형", 경제와 사회, (93), pp.13~41 (2012), 비판사회학회
  19. Present situation and plan for support of victims by humidifier disinfectant, "Ministry of Environment", ~ (2018)
  20. 박진영, "한국 담배소송에서의 위험과 책임: 역학과 후기 근대적 인과", 과학기술학연구, 15(2), pp.229~262 (2015), 한국과학기술학회[DOI]
  21. Funtowicz SO, "Social Theories of Risk", pp.251~273 (1992), Praeger
  22. Renn O, "Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World" (2008), Earthscan
  23. Theory and practice of participatory risk governance, "Lee YH", 281~314 (2010)
  24. Jasanoff S, "Technologies of humility : Citizen participation in governing science", Minerva, 41(3), pp.223~244 (2003)
  25. Brown P, "No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action" (1990), University of California Press
  26. Epstein S, "Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge" (1996), University of California Press
  27. Callon M, "Research"in the wild"and the shaping of new social identities", Technology in Society, 25, pp.193~204 (2003)
  28. Allen B, "Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana’s Chemical Corridor Disputes" (2003), The MIT Press
  29. Corburn J, "Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice" (2005), The MIT Press
  30. McCormick S, "Mobilizing Science: Movements, Participation, and the Remaking of Knowledge" (2009), Temple University Press
  31. Miyamoto K, "A Study on the History of Pollution in Postwar Japan" (2016), Miseum
  32. Hanada M, "Applying the lessons learned from Minamata disease and its mistakes to the future", Proceedings of the 3rd International Forum on Environmental Pollution and Social Impacts (2019)
  33. 김용화, "환경독성학적 관점에서 본 가습기살균제 사건과 국가의 책임- 고분자물질 등록 시험 자료 제출 면제 조항을 중심으로 -", 환경법과 정책, 16, pp.83~99 (2016), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  34. 박태현, "가습기 살균제 사건과 국가배상책임", 환경법과 정책, 16, pp.35~56 (2016), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  35. George TS, "Minamata: Pollution and the Struggle for Democracy in Postwar Japan" (2001), Harvard University Asia Center
  36. 이영희, "재난 관리, 재난 거버넌스, 재난 시티즌십", 경제와 사회, (104), pp.56~80 (2014), 비판사회학회[DOI]
  37. Lee YH, "Science, Technology and Democracy" (2011), Moonhakgwajisungsa
  38. Petryna A, "Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl" (2002), Princeton University Press
  39. Ulich Beck, "Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society?" (2014), Public speech at the Seoul Press Center

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)