본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

환경배출범주/특수환경배출범주 기반 ECETOC TRA 및 주요/산업/용도 분류체계 이용의 K-CHESAR에 의한 환경예측농도 비교 연구

A Comparative Study of Predicted Environmental Concentrations from ECETOC TRA Based on Environmental Release Categories/Specific Environmental Release Categories and K-CHESAR Using Main/Industrial/Use Categories

양지수|조하나|최은경|김상헌|전현표
한국환경보건학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Health)|2023.12|한국환경보건학회지 (JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES)|제49권 제6호|pp. 312-323|DOI 10.5668/JEHS.2023.49.6.312

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Environmental release categoryemission factorsindustrial categorypredicted environmental concentrationspecific environmental release category

초록

Background: Environmental concentrations of substances can be estimated by K-CHESAR based on main, industrial, and use categories (MC/IC/UC) and ECETOC TRA based on environmental or specific environmental categories (ERC or spERC). Objectives: Three different systems for estimating environmental concentrations were compared to figure out their order with possible reasons along with relationship of regional predicted environmental concentrations (PECregional) and final PEClocal for various uses of a substance. Methods: Typical uses of the case substance and their corresponding ERCs were selected from the webpage of the European Chemical Agency. Proper MC/IC/UC and spERC were assigned to each ERC. Emission fractions were compared for each assessment code from the available database. PECs were calculated by three estimating systems: K-CHESAR using MC/IC/UC, ECETOC TRA using ERC, and ECETOC TRA using spERC with their default values for input parameters. Percentage of PECregional to PEClocal were manually calculated for each use. Results: Emission factors decreased in the order of ERC > MC/IC/UC > spERC. Values of the final PEClocal derived as sum of PECregional and Clocal decreased in the order of calculations using ECETOC TRA-ERC>K- CHESAR with MC/IC/UC>ECETOC TRA-spERC for all environmental media. Percentages of PECregional,water to PEClocal,water ranged from 0 to 10.3% in industrial uses calculated with MC/IC/UC and ERC but 96.3 to 100% in wide dispersive uses of ERC and spERC where values of Clocal,water are estimated to be very low. Conclusions: ECETOC TRA generated the most refined PNEC values with spERC and the least with ERC, while K-CHESAR with MC/IC/UC generated values between the two results. The ratio of PECregional to PEClocal can be a good measure for performing suitable estimation of PNECs according to use.

Abstract

Background: Environmental concentrations of substances can be estimated by K-CHESAR based on main, industrial, and use categories (MC/IC/UC) and ECETOC TRA based on environmental or specific environmental categories (ERC or spERC). Objectives: Three different systems for estimating environmental concentrations were compared to figure out their order with possible reasons along with relationship of regional predicted environmental concentrations (PECregional) and final PEClocal for various uses of a substance. Methods: Typical uses of the case substance and their corresponding ERCs were selected from the webpage of the European Chemical Agency. Proper MC/IC/UC and spERC were assigned to each ERC. Emission fractions were compared for each assessment code from the available database. PECs were calculated by three estimating systems: K-CHESAR using MC/IC/UC, ECETOC TRA using ERC, and ECETOC TRA using spERC with their default values for input parameters. Percentage of PECregional to PEClocal were manually calculated for each use. Results: Emission factors decreased in the order of ERC > MC/IC/UC > spERC. Values of the final PEClocal derived as sum of PECregional and Clocal decreased in the order of calculations using ECETOC TRA-ERC>K- CHESAR with MC/IC/UC>ECETOC TRA-spERC for all environmental media. Percentages of PECregional,water to PEClocal,water ranged from 0 to 10.3% in industrial uses calculated with MC/IC/UC and ERC but 96.3 to 100% in wide dispersive uses of ERC and spERC where values of Clocal,water are estimated to be very low. Conclusions: ECETOC TRA generated the most refined PNEC values with spERC and the least with ERC, while K-CHESAR with MC/IC/UC generated values between the two results. The ratio of PECregional to PEClocal can be a good measure for performing suitable estimation of PNECs according to use.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Guidance document for preparation of chemical safety report, "National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER)", NIER, ~, pp.NIER-GP2016-16 (2021)
  2. "Guideline to Korea Chemical Safety Assessment and Reporting Tool and Exposure Scenario Document and Tool"[URL]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER), "User manual for the estimation model for calculation of predicted environmental concentrations to implement K-REACH", NIER, ~ (2017)
  4. Cohen Y, "Multimedia modeling of environmental transport : trichloroethylene test case", Environ Sci Technol, 19(5), pp.412~417 (1985)
  5. Mackay D, "Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals", Chemosphere, 24(6), pp.695~717 (1992)
  6. "SimpleBox"[URL]
  7. Hollander A, "SimpleBox 4.0: improving the model while keeping it simple…", Chemosphere, 148, pp.99~107 (2016)
  8. SimpleBox: a generic multimedia fate evaluation model, "van de Meent D", National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), ~, pp.Report No.: 672720 001 (1993)
  9. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.16: Environmental exposure assessment. Version 3.0", ECHA, ~ (2016)
  10. ECETOC TRA version 3: background and rationale for the improvements, "European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC)", ECETOC, ~, pp.Technical report No.: 114 (2012)
  11. 나진성, "메탄올 작업장 노출 평가에의 EU REACH 프로토콜 적용: Targeted Risk Assessment", 한국환경보건학회지, 47(5), pp.432~445 (2021), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  12. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), "Targeted risk assessment user guide for the integrated tool TRAM. Version 3.1", ECETOC, ~ (2017)
  13. Addendum to TR114: technical basis for the TRA v3.1, "European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC)", ECETOC, ~, pp.Technical report No.: 124 (2014)
  14. Addendum to ECETOC targeted risk assessment report No. 93, "European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC)", ECETOC, ~, pp.Technical report No.: 107 (2009)
  15. European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), "Cefic guidance. Specific environmental release categories (SPERCs) chemical safety assessments, supply chain communication and downstream user compliance", Cefic, ~ (2012)
  16. "EUSES - European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances"[URL]
  17. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), "Cefic guidance. How to use EUSES 2.2.0", ECHA, ~ (2019)
  18. "SimpleTreat"[URL]
  19. Application of SimpleTreat 4.0 in European substance regulations, "Struijs J.", National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, ~, pp.Project No. (FKZ) 27525 (2015)
  20. European Chemicals Agency(ECHA), "Chesar 3 in a nutshell", ECHA, ~ (2018)
  21. "Chesar: news"[URL]
  22. European Union system for the evaluation of substances 2.0. Version 2.0, "Lijzen JPA", National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), ~, pp.Report No.:601900005 (2004), 2004
  23. Vermeire T, "European Union system for the evaluation of substances : the second version", Chemosphere, 59(4), pp.473~485 (2005)
  24. "Targeted risk assessment (TRA) public workshop"[URL]
  25. European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association(ACEA), "Specific Environmental Release Categories (SPERCs) for industrial use of coatings in installations with wet scrubber for collection of overspray (intermittent release to water due to replacement of scrubber content maximum twice per year): background document", ACEA, ~ (2012)
  26. Reihlen A, "SPERCS—a tool for environmental emission estimation", Integr Environ Assess Manag, 12(4), pp.772~781 (2016)
  27. Sättler D, "Specific environmental release categories--a tool for improving chemical safety assessment in the EC--report of a multi-stakeholder workshop", Integr Environ Assess Manag, 8(4), pp.580~585 (2012)
  28. Ahrens A, "European Union regulators and industry agree on improving specific environmental release categories : report from the exchange network for exposure scenarios specific environmental release category workshop on May 13, 2016", Integr Environ Assess Manag, 13(5), pp.815~820 (2017)
  29. Concawe, "Handbook. Identified uses of petroleum substances", Concawe, ~ (2020)
  30. "Environment"[URL]
  31. "K-CHESAR. Version. 5.0"[URL]
  32. "Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid- partition coefficient"[URL]
  33. "Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid - manufacture"[URL]
  34. "Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid - formulation"[URL]
  35. "Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid - uses at industrial sites"[URL]
  36. "Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid - uses by professional workers"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

EU REACH 이행에 사용되는 노출평가 툴의 현황과 전망김동현, 김상헌, 전현표, 최은경한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2024 · 제50권 제4호공정 범주에 따른 ECETOC TRA 모델 평가로부터 도출한 한국 작업장 노출 평가 개선 방안김기은, 김상현, 김종운, 전현표, 정연승한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2019 · 제45권 제2호노출 모델의 화평법 적용성: ECETOC TRA와 Stoffenmanager Tier 1 노출 모델을 활용한 벤젠의 작업자 노출 평가김기태, 나진성, 문준식, 옥정원, 정욱현한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2018 · 제44권 제5호화평법에 따른 급성 수생독성 예측을 위한 QSAR 모델의 활용 가능성 연구강동진, 김필제, 성창호, 이상희, 이시원, 이재현, 장석원, 정현미한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2022 · 제48권 제3호국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교강소현, 이기영, 임미영한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2024 · 제50권 제1호OECD QSAR Application Toolbox를 이용한 화학물질의 건강유해성 및 생태독성 예측김정곤, 김탁수, 김필제, 김현경, 박상희, 서정관한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2013 · 제39권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

HPLC를 이용한 국내 유통 막걸리 내 인공감미료 함량 조사고영림, 신혜원, 박나연, 김예지, 김민서pp. 289-294교사 내 플랜트 모델 유형별 적용에 따른 공기질 변화양호형, 이형석, 김광진, 김형주, 방성원, 김호현, 한승원, 조흔우pp. 295-304분무형 생활화학제품의 분사형태 분류제안과 부유비율 평가윤충식, 황성호, 조경덕, 김민정, 김민철, 박정연, 조현빈, 이명호, 이기영pp. 305-311모의 실험주택 모니터링 결과를 활용한 실내공기 및 바닥먼지 중 Di(2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate (DEHP)의 이론적 총량 비율 산출김승중, 정승표, 천사호, 강다영, 이가원, 김기태pp. 324-3334,4’-Methylenedianiline의 환경매체별 위해성평가지경희, 조훈제, 유시은, 이대엽, 서정관, 우경숙, 이인혜, 김현수pp. 334-343
원문 보기