습지보전과 개발관련 법제의 조화
The Harmony of Wetlands Conservation and Laws Related Exploitation
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The conservation and perpetual exploitation and utilization of wetlands have become a problem winning far and wide international attention. We are undeniable necessity to proceed with exploitation business for balanced developments of national economy like necessity to keep the natural environment. Therefore, substantially a perfect conservation of wetlands is impossible. If so, there is the necessity of the laws which can accept demand of exploitation of wetlands as a systematic improvement plan for harmony with wetlands conservation and exploitation while minimizing loss and damage of wetlands. There is necessity to take introduction of ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ is duty into consideration as systems to satisfy to this. To date, ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ has been interpreted to mean wetlands should be conserved wherever possible, and that acres of wetlands converted to other uses must be offset through restoration and creation of other wetlands, maintaining or increasing the total wetland resource base. In other words, ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ by itself implies the continued loss of habitat. ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ can be realized by wetlands mitigation banking system. A wetlands mitigation banking system is defined as an area designated for the restoration, creation, enhancement and, in exceptional circumstances, preservation of wetlands and other aquatic resources expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to similar resources. The objective of the bank is to contribute to the goal of ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ by maintaining and enhancing the physical, biological and chemical functions lost from authorized impacts to wetlands. In this study, I try to present the comparative analysis of recent wetland legislations and policies of Korea regarding wetlands conservation. In order to develop all-around wetlands conservation management of Korea, it is suggested that we learn advanced management models and experiences from foreign developed countries, establish a management system led by government.
Abstract
The conservation and perpetual exploitation and utilization of wetlands have become a problem winning far and wide international attention. We are undeniable necessity to proceed with exploitation business for balanced developments of national economy like necessity to keep the natural environment. Therefore, substantially a perfect conservation of wetlands is impossible. If so, there is the necessity of the laws which can accept demand of exploitation of wetlands as a systematic improvement plan for harmony with wetlands conservation and exploitation while minimizing loss and damage of wetlands. There is necessity to take introduction of ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ is duty into consideration as systems to satisfy to this. To date, ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ has been interpreted to mean wetlands should be conserved wherever possible, and that acres of wetlands converted to other uses must be offset through restoration and creation of other wetlands, maintaining or increasing the total wetland resource base. In other words, ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ by itself implies the continued loss of habitat. ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ can be realized by wetlands mitigation banking system. A wetlands mitigation banking system is defined as an area designated for the restoration, creation, enhancement and, in exceptional circumstances, preservation of wetlands and other aquatic resources expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to similar resources. The objective of the bank is to contribute to the goal of ‘No Net Loss of Wetlands’ by maintaining and enhancing the physical, biological and chemical functions lost from authorized impacts to wetlands. In this study, I try to present the comparative analysis of recent wetland legislations and policies of Korea regarding wetlands conservation. In order to develop all-around wetlands conservation management of Korea, it is suggested that we learn advanced management models and experiences from foreign developed countries, establish a management system led by government.
참고문헌 (37)
- 경상남도지역 습지조사 보고서, , 경남발전연구원, ~ (2006)
- 곽승준, "조건부가치측정법을 이용한 우포늪의 보존가치 추정", 국제경제연구 8(3),, ~ (2002)
- 2008년도 국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 연차보고서, , 국토해양부, ~ (2008)
- 김일중, "환경정책의 비용", 편익분석 지침서, 2003
- 김홍균, "갯벌의 보전 및 관리-습지보전법의 한계와 개선방향", 저스티스 통권 제69호, ~ (2002)
- 낙동강유역 습지조사 보고서, , 낙동강유역환경청, ~ (2006)
- 남정호, "OECD 환경성 평가 권고안 이행 방안 - 연안ㆍ해양 자연환경 및 생물다양성 보전 분야 -", 통권 : 268 (2007), 월간해양수산
- 박균성ㆍ함태성, "환경법" (2008), 박영사
- 새만금 갯벌의 수산물 생산가치 추정 새만금사업 환경영향공동조사 결과보고서(경제성 분야)의 일부, "박정근", 새만금사업 환경영향 공동조사단, ~ (2000)
- 방상원, "습지보전을 위한 정책방안 연구-습지은행제도(Wetland Banking)을 중심으로-", 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원, ~ (2006)
- 방상원, "습지환경포럼", 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원, 2006
- 비시장재화 가치 평가의 이론과 실제, 연구보고서, "신영철", 국회에산정책처, 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원, ~ (2007)
- 이규천, "생물다양성 관리계약 시행체계에 대한 연구", 한국농촌경제연구원, ~ (2001)
- 전병성, "환경보전을 위한 토지이용규제제도의 현황과 개선방향", 저스티스 통권 제74호, ~ (2003)
- 조승현, "생물다양성 보전을 위한 유인제도 활성화 방안", 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원, ~ (1999)
- "대체습지조성 중장기 계획 수립용역(Ⅰ)", 해양수산부 해양연구원, ~ (2003)
- "환경부, UNDP, GEF, 국가습지보전기본계획 수립", ~ (2007)
- "환경부, UNDP, GEF국가습지보전사업단, 습지총량제 도입 방안 구축사업", ~ (2007)
- "환경부, UNDP, GEF국가습지보전사업단, 국가습지 유형분류 체계구축", ~ (2005)
- "환경부, UNDP, GEF국가습지보전사업단, 2006 전국내륙습지 정밀조사-산들늪ㆍ화포늪ㆍ장척지ㆍ금강호", ~ (2007)
- "습지보호지역 보전계획", 환경부, ~ (2003)
- "습지보전의 경험과 전략", 환경운동연합, 2000
- 홍준형, "환경법" (2005), 박영사
- Dugan,Patrick, "Wetlands in Danger", World Conservation Atlas Series, ~ (1993)
- "Environmental Law Institute, Banks and Fees-The Status of Off-Site Wetland Mitigation in the United States", ~ (2002)
- 2005 status Report on Compensatory Mitigation in the U.S., Environmental Law Institute, "Jessica Wilkinson", ~ (2006)
- John Kusler, "Our national wetland heritage-A protection guide(2nd ed.), Environmental Law Institute", ~ (1996)
- Mitsch, William J., "Wetlands", 4th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, ~ (2007)
- Nancy K. Kubasek, "Environmental law", Pearson, 2008
- Richared L. Revesz, "Environmental Law, the Economy, and Sustainable Development" (2000), CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
- "US EPA & Environmental Law Institute, Measuring Mitigation - A Review of the Science for Compensatory Mitigation Performance Standards", ~ (2004)
- "US EPA,Wetlands.laws"[URL]
- "헌재 1999. 10. 21 선고 97헌바26 결정; 헌재 1998. 12. 24 선고 89헌마214 결정", ~ (1998)
- "대법원 2006.6.2. 자 2004마1148,1149 결정 참조", ~ (2006)
- "서울행법 2005. 2. 4. 선고 2001구합33563 판결; 서울고법 2005.12.21. 선고 2005누4412 판결; 대법원 2006.3.16. 선고 2006두330 전원합의체 판결", ~ (2005)