사형 처벌의 의미
What The Ultimate Punishment Means
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
사형제도 존치냐 폐지냐의 법철학적 논쟁은 여러 갈래다. 세계 평화와 인권과문명을 외치는 평화주의자(pacifists)의 사형제 반대는 감상주의가 지나쳐 논쟁의가치가 없다. 존치파거나 폐지파거나 공리주의자들(utilitarians)은 한결같이 현실적쓸모에 너무 집착한 나머지, 그들의 처벌론은 허구적이고 인위적으로 처벌의 본질을 비껴간다. 그래서 처벌의 해석이 비교적으로 보다 사실적이고 본래적이라는 점에서 응보론자들(retributivists)이 일단 논쟁에서 앞선다. 그러나 수정주의자 하트(H.L.A. Hart)를 위시한 공리적 혼합파들(utilitarian hybrids)의 처벌의 공리와 응보의 양면성을 바탕으로 한 공세 앞에 응보론은 속수무책이다. 그러므로 고전적응보론은 새롭게 통합적으로 재구성되어야한다. 벌의 사회성이라는 불가분의 관계를 통해서 처벌의 개인의 정당한 응보성은, 동시에 그리고 반드시, 사회의 유용한공리성을 수반하여야한다. 공리없는 응보없고 응보없는 공리없다. 인간 생명을 종식시키는 극형인 사형을 통해서 되갚음만 있고 쓰임새가 없거나 쓰임새만 있고 되갚음이 없어서야 되겠는가. 가능하지도 바람직하지도 않을 것이다. 이제는 통합적응보론자들(holistic retributionists)이 앞장서야할 때다.
Abstract
The pro and con of capital punishment has been hotly controversial in the discussion of legal philosophy. It seems no use in the discussion that pacifists are going to deny death penalty in the name of world peace, human rights, and civilized culture. It's too emotional. As punishment theorists, utilitarians, either abolitionists or retentionists, are fictitious and factitious both in that they may not be factual in the factual sense and in that they may not be natural in the psychological sense. As opposed to utilitarians, retributionists, being natural as well as factual, are superior in that sense, but in that sense only, to say the least. They are almost helpless against the challenge of what is called (utilitarian) hybrids with some force. Therefore classical retributionism needs to be newly holistically remedied. Holistically extended retributionism demands that punishment as fair retribution to each offender should necessitate punishment with social benefit on the basis of the intimate link between punishment and society. We note that while retribution without social outcome would be empty, utility without retributive justice would be blind. We also note, more importantly, that either case cannot be possible nor desirable. It is time holistic retributionism for death punishment prevails.
참고문헌 (66)
- Bedau, Hugo Adam, "Capital Punishment, In The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics", pp.705~733 (2003), Oxford University Press
- Bedau, Hugo Adam, "An Abolitionist's Survey of the Death Penalty in America Today, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.15~50 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Bienen, Leigh Buchanan, "Murder and Its Consequences: Essays on Capital Punishment in America" (2010), Northwestern University Press
- Blattberg, Charles, "Taking Politics Seriously - but Not Too Seriously", Social Science Research Network, pp.1~10 (2010)
- Bright, Stephen B, "Why the United States Will Join the Rest of the World in Abandoning Capital Punishment, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.152~182 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Cassell, Paul G, "In Defense of the Death Penalty, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.183~217 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Clark, Michael, "Mill on Capital Punishment - Retributive Overtones?", Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42(3), pp.327~332 (2004), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Dahnke, Michael D, "Film, Art, and Filmart: An Introduction to Aesthetics Through Film" (2007), University Press of America
- Ezra, Ovadia, "Moral Dilemmas in Real Life: Current Issues in Applied Ethics" (2010), Springer
- Ezra, Ovadia, "The Withdrawal of Rights: Rights from a Different Perspective" (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Feinberg, Joel, "The Expressive Function of Punishment, In Philosophy of Law", pp.761~771 (2004), Wadsworth
- Fletcher, George P, "Punishment and Responsibility, In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory", pp.514~523 (2003), Blackwell Publishing
- Glossop, Ronald J, "Is Hume a "Classical Utilitarian"?", Hume Studies, 2(1), pp.1~16 (1976)
- Goldman, Alan H, "The Paradox of Punishment, In Punishment", pp.30~46 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Hampton, Jean, "The Moral Education Theory of Punishment, In Punishment", pp.112~142 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Hart, H.L.A, "The Concept of Law" (1961), Oxford University Press
- Hart, H.L.A, "Punishment and Responsibility" (1968), Oxford University Press
- Hart, H.L.A, "Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy" (1983), Oxford University Press
- Hook, Sidney, "The Death Sentence: Limited Use, In Life and Death: A Reader in Moral Problems", pp.389~390 (1999), Wadsworth
- 황필홍, "Punishment as Equality", 미국학 논집, 38(1), pp.37~72 (2006), 한국아메리카학회
- Jones, Sandra J, "Coalition Building in the Anti-Death Penalty Movement: Privileged Morality, Race Realities" (2010), Lexington Books
- Kant, Immanuel, "Ethical Philosophy" (1988), Hackett Publishing Company
- Kozinski, Alex, "Tinkering with Death, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.1~14 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Marquis, Joshua K, "Truth and Consequences: The Penalty of Death, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.117~151 (2004), Oxford University Press
- "Mill's Speech before the British Parliament on April 21, 1868 in opposition to a Bill banning Capital Punishment proposed by Mr. Gilpin", ~
- Morris, Herbert, "A Retributive Theory of Punishment, In Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Readings", pp.853~860 (1999), Harcourt Brace & Company
- Morris, Herbert, "Persons and Punishment, In The Social Organization of Law: Introductory Readings", pp.472~479 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Munson, Ronald, "Basics of Reasoning" (2001), Wadsworth
- Murphy, Jeffrie G, "Marxism and Retribution, In Punishment", pp.3~29 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Nathanson, Stephen, "Does It Matter if the Death Penalty Is Arbitrarily Administered?, In Punishment", pp.308~323 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Pojman, Louis P, "Why the Death Penalty Is Morally Permissible, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.51~75 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Rachels, James, "The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 6th ed" (2010), The McGraw-Hill Companies
- Rawls, J, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Oxford University Press
- Ralws, J, "Political Liberalism" (1993), Columbia University Press
- Reiman, Jeffrey H, "Justice, Civilization, and the Death Penalty: Answering van den Haag, In Punishment", pp.274~307 (1995), Princeton University Press
- Russell, Bertrand, "What I Believe" (2010), Routledge
- Ryan, George, "I Must Act, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.218~234 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Salmon, Merrilee H, "Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking, 2nd ed" (1989), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
- Stevenson, Bryan, "Close to Death: Reflections on Race and Capital Punishment in America, In Debating the Death Penalty", pp.76~116 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, Charles, "Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Taylor, Charles, "Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 2" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Tebbit, Mark, "Philosophy of Law: An Introduction" (2002), Routledge
- van den Haag, Ernest, "Refuting Reiman and Nathanson, In Punishment", pp.324~335 (1995), Princeton University Press
- van den Haag, Ernest, "The Death Penalty: Pro and Con, In Life and Death: A Reader in Moral Problems", pp.391~394 (2000), Wadsworth
- Walton, Douglas, "Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed" (2008), Cambridge University
- Zimmerman, Paul R, "The Economics of Capital Punishment and Deterrence, In Handbook on the Economics of Crime", pp.381~431 (2010), Edward Elgar
- "경향신문사설, "사형 보호감호제 - 정부 여당 시계는 거꾸로 가나"", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- "경향신문사설, “사형제 합헌 결정, 그러나 대세는 폐지다”", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- 김지은, "사형제는 또 다른 형태의 살인 - 폐지 마땅", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- 김철웅, "사형수", 경향신문, ~ (2009)
- 김희진, "사형제 폐지 대세 - 한국의 선택은?", 경향신문, ~ (2011)
- 고은태, "사형제 합헌결정은 생명권에 대한 침해", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- 고준승, "사형제에 대한 단상", 법률신문, ~ (2009)
- "법률신문사설, "법무부장관, 사형집행 조속히 해야"", 법률신문, ~ (2009)
- "법률신문사설, “사형제도 폐지보다는 정비를”", 법률신문, ~ (2005)
- 선우정, "사형에 대한 일본의 관점", 조선일보, ~ (2008)
- 송호창, "사형 부추기는 정부", 경향신문, ~ (2009)
- 윤종행, "사형제도와 인간의 존엄성", 법학연구, 13(2), pp.79~95 (2003), 법학연구원
- 이경재, "사형제, 운영의 묘를", 조선일보, ~ (2001)
- 이규태, "사형폐지 법안", 조선일보, ~ (2001)
- 이규태, "사형폐지 연합", 조선일보, ~ (2001)
- 이창영, "사형은 살인이다", 조선일보, ~ (2001)
- 이호중, "사형집행 재개, 무엇을 위한 것인가", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- 장석일, "생명 존중 인권의 가치 충돌 - 신중한 접근 필요", 경향신문, ~ (2010)
- 필립 티에보, "‘사형제 폐지’는 세계적 흐름", 경향신문, ~ (2008)
- 황필홍, "되갚는 정의로서의 사형제", 철학연구, (72), pp.243~271 (2006), 철학연구회