승차공유 앱에 대한 택시관련 규제체계의 대응과 수용가능성: 미국과의 비교를 중심으로
Response of Taxi Regulation to Ride-Sharing App and Possibility of Future Embracement: Focusing on Comparative Analysis between U.S. and Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
플랫폼으로서 승차공유 앱의 규제체계 내 수용은 기존 규제체계에 자율적 규제로의 전환 과 법적 지위가 불안한 운전자 집단을 탄생을 포함한 여러 가지 도전을 던진다. 이에 따 라 승차공유 앱의 수용에는 기존 택시서비스 공급현황, 택시관련 규제체계의 구조, 운전 자들의 구성과 지위, 연관 산업으로서 기술혁신을 대표하는 자율주행자동차의 발전정도 와 같은 요인들이 영향을 미친다. 승차공유 앱을 교통연결회사 입법으로 성공적으로 수 용한 미국과 달리 개인택시를 중심으로 택시서비스 과잉 공급 상태인 한국에서 규제체계 의 전환이 어려운 것은 위와 같은 요인들의 작용이 원인이다. 이러한 상황은 기술혁신으 로 다가올 자율주행자동차의 도입 시에도 여전히 영향을 미치므로 기존 택시산업의 전환 을 위한 일관성 있는 정책이 요구된다.
Abstract
Embracement of the ride-sharing app functioning platform brings challenges to the incumbent regulatory system centered on taxi, including transition to the self-regulation by ride-sharing app and emergence of ride-sharing app drivers having indeterminate legal status. Accordingly, embracement of ride-sharing app is influenced by many factors like status of taxi service supply by incumbent taxi industry, structure of regulatory system of taxi industry, composition and status of taxi and ride-sharing app drivers, developmental stages of automated vehicle as related industry. Contrary to the U.S. which has successfully embraced ride-sharing app with enactment of transportation network company, forementioned- factors affects negatively in transition of taxi regulation in Korea where taxi service is oversupplied by mainly individual medallion taxi drivers. These negative factors will be remained by advent of automated vehicle which comes as innovation in near future and should be ameliorated by consistent policy implementation for the taxi industry’s preparation.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김병오, "우버택시와 적합성에 대한 연구", 법학연구, 46, pp.99~134 (2015), 부설법학연구소
- 김병오, "우버택시와 면허제도에 대한 연구", 기업법연구, 32(1), pp.309~334 (2018), 한국기업법학회[DOI]
- 한국과 일본의 택시정책 비교연구, "강상욱", 한국교통연구원, ~ (2015)
- 카카오모빌리티, "카카오모빌리티 리포트", ~ (2018)
- Jordan M. Barry, "Regulatory Entrepreneurship", S. Cal. L. Rev, 90, pp.383~448 (2017)
- Kenneth A. Bamberger, "Platform Market Power", Berkeley Tech. L. J, 32, pp.1051~1092 (2017)
- Miriam A. Cherry, "Dependent Contractors in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach", Am. U. L. Rev, 66, pp.635~689 (2017)
- Paul Stephen Dempsey, "Taxi Industry Regulation, Deregulation, and Reregulation: the Paradox of Market Failure", Transportation L. J, 24, pp.73~120 (1996)
- V. B. Dubal, "The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco’s Taxi & Uber Economies", Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L, 38, pp.73~135 (2017)
- Hubert Horan, "Will the Growth of Uber Increase Economic Welfare?", Transp. L.J, 44, pp.33~105 (2017)
- J. Domenic Martini, "International Regulatory Enterpreneurship:Uber’s Battle with Regulators in France", San Diego Int’l L.J, 19, pp.127~160 (2017)
- Eric Phillips, "The Future of Autonomous Vehicles in American Cities", N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y, 21, pp.287~336 (2018)
- Ilya Shapiro, "Regulation Uber Alles: How Governments Hurt Workers and Consumers in the New Economy", U. Chi. Legal F, 2017, pp.461~485 (2017)
- Abbey Stemler, "The Myth of the Sharing Economy and its Implications for Regulating Innovation", Emory L. J, 67, pp.197~241 (2017)
- David K. Suska, "Regulatory Takings and Ridesharing: “Just Compensation” for Taxi Medallion Owners?", N.Y.U. J. Legis. &Pub. Pol’y, 19, pp.183~213 (2016)
- Katrina M. Wyman, "Taxi Regulation in the Age of Uber", N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y, 20, pp.1~100 (2017)
- Trends in Public Transportation Ridership:Implications for Federal Policy, "William J. Mallet", CRS, ~, pp.CRS Report R45144 (2018)
- FTC, "The “Sharing” Economy: Issues Facing Platforms, Participants, and Regulators", Workshop Transcript, ~ (2015)
- New York City Mobility Report, "NYC Department of Transportation", ~ (2018)
- San Francisco County Transportation Authority, "TNCs Today", ~ (2017)
- SFMTA, "Managing Taxi Supply: Best Practices Study of Regulation", ~ (2013)
- SFMTA., "Short Range Transit Plan", ~ (2016)