생물개념평가의 자기모니터링에서 과신편향과 어려움-쉬움 효과 탐색
Exploring the Effects of Overconfidence Bias and Hard-easy Effect in Self-monitoring of Biological Concept Test
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explored the overconfidence bias and hard-easy effects of students' biological concept levels and self-monitoring accuracy. To this end, 361 high school first and second grade students participated in the study. As a consequence of this study, there were differences between genders or years in the four types of knowledge-confidence and significant differences between genders in specificity. As a result of clustering model analysis, hard-easy effects were found in a large number of students, and there were many cases in which the tendency to overconfidence was noticeable. Based on these findings, it was suggested that students should be educated to recognize and reduce hard-easy effects and overconfidence bias through different educational strategy between student groups.
Abstract
This study explored the overconfidence bias and hard-easy effects of students' biological concept levels and self-monitoring accuracy. To this end, 361 high school first and second grade students participated in the study. As a consequence of this study, there were differences between genders or years in the four types of knowledge-confidence and significant differences between genders in specificity. As a result of clustering model analysis, hard-easy effects were found in a large number of students, and there were many cases in which the tendency to overconfidence was noticeable. Based on these findings, it was suggested that students should be educated to recognize and reduce hard-easy effects and overconfidence bias through different educational strategy between student groups.
참고문헌 (40)
- Bandura, A., "Scocial Foundation of Thoguht and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory" (1986), Prentice-Hall
- Beyer, S., "Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations", Sex Roles, 41, pp.279~296 (1999)
- Bol, L., "The calibration accuracy of middle school students in math classes", Journal of Research in Education, 21, pp.81~96 (2010)
- A Target-based Foundation for the “Hard-easy Effect” Bias, "Bordley, R.", Universit`a Ca’ Foscari Venezia, ~ (2014)
- Francis, X. S., "Knowledge Monitoring Calibration: Sensitivity and Specificity as Unique Cognitive Constructs", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36, pp.3078~3083 (2014)
- Overconfidence of professionals and lay men: Individual differences within and between tasks?, "Glaser, M.", ~, pp.No. 05–25 (2005)
- Grimes, P. W., "The overconfident principles of economics student: An examination of a metacognitive skill", The Journal of Economic Education, 33, pp.15~30 (2010)
- Ha, M., "Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, pp.95~121 (2012)
- Ha, M., "Pre-service biology teachers’ mixed model of Darwinism and Lamarckism", Brain, Digital, &Learing, 7, pp.175~189 (2017)
- 하민수, "Biology Teachers’ Perception of Value of Biology Learning", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 9(2), pp.1~8 (2019), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Handel, M., "Enhanced monitoring accuracy and test performance:Incremental effects of judgment training over and above repeated testing", Learning and Instruction, 65, pp.101245~ (2020)
- Haselton, M. G., "Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology", pp.724~746 (2005), Wiley
- 황성민, "자기 주도적 학습이 강화된 조별 발표 물리 수업이 마이스터고 학생의 과학 관련 태도와 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.499~509 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Kahneman D., "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases" (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Keller, J., "When women can’t do math: The interplay of self-construal, group identification, and stereotypic performance standards", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, pp.437~444 (2008)
- Koku, P. S., "Overconfidence and the performance of business students on examinations", Journal of Education for Business, 79, pp.217~224 (2004)
- Larrick, R. P., "Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not)", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, pp.76~94 (2007)
- Lichtenstein, S., "Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs", pp.275~324 (1977), Reidel
- Nelson, T. O., "Consciousness and metacognition", American Psychologist, 51, pp.102~116 (1996)
- Nowell, C., "I thought I got an A! : Overconfidence across the economics curriculum", The Journal of Economic Education, 38, pp.131~142 (2007)
- Oskamp, S., "Overconfidence in case-study judgments", Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, pp.261~265 (1965)
- Ots, A., "Third graders' performance predictions : Calibration deflections and academic success", European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, pp.223~237 (2013)
- Pajares, F., "Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, pp.124~139 (1999)
- Pallier, G., "Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks", Sex Roles, 48, pp.265~276 (2003)
- Pintrich, P., "A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self regulated learning in college students", Educational Psychology Review, 16, pp.385~407 (2004)
- Rachmatullah, A., "Examining high-school students’ overconfidence bias in biology exam : a focus on the effects of country and gender", International Journal of Science Education, 41, pp.652~673 (2019)
- Russo, J. E., "Managing overconfidence", Sloan Management Review, 33, pp.7~17 (1992)
- Rutherford, T., "The measurement of calibration in real contexts", Learning and Instruction, 47, pp.33~42 (2017)
- Schraw, G., "Measure for measure : Calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores", Learning and Instruction, 24, pp.48~57 (2013)
- Stankov, L., "Confidence and cognitive test performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, pp.961~976 (2008)
- Stone, N., "Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning", Educational Psychology Review, 12, pp.437~475 (2000)
- Svenson, O., "Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?", Acta Psychologica, 47, pp.143~148 (1981)
- Taylor, S. E., "Illusion and well-being : A social psychological perspective on mental health", Psychological Bulletin, 103, pp.193~210 (1988)
- Weinstein, N. D., "Unrealistic optimism about future life events", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, pp.806~820 (1980)
- Winman, A., "Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, pp.1167~1175 (2004)
- Winne, P. H., "Inherent details in self-regulated learning", Educational Psychologist, 30, pp.173~187 (1995)
- Winne, P. H., "Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives", pp.153~189 (2001), Erlbaum
- Winne, P. H., "Students' calibration of knowledge and learning processes: Implications for designing powerful software learning environments", International Journal of Educational Research, 41, pp.466~488 (2004)
- Wood, W., "Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, pp.55~123 (2012)
- Wüst, K., "“I thought I did much better”—Overconfidence in university exams", Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16, pp.310~333 (2018)