기하학적 도형 구성에서 나타난 아동의 사고 수준
Children’s Thinking Levels in Composition of Geometric Figures
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Early geometric learning depends on the child's level of thinking. In order to make geometric learning more meaningful for children, it is important for teachers to provide teaching and learning experiences suitable for children's thinking development level. For this, it is necessary to clearly know the level of thinking about the construction of geometric figures in children. Therefore, in this study, the thinking level of children expressed in geometric figure composition was analyzed. The research results are as follows. First, the percentage of correct answers for the tasks was the highest in the second year of elementary school, and it was a significant difference in the correct answer rate only for the puppy task between kindergarten and second year of elementary school. Second, as for the thinking level of children in the process of constructing geometric figures, kindergarten children aged 5 showed the highest thinking at the picture maker level, and the 1st and 2nd graders of elementary school had the most thinking at the shape composer level. Third, the average movement frequency of tangram piece was the highest at the picture maker level among the thinking levels. Only at the s piece assembler level, there was a significant difference between kindergarten and first-year elementary school students.
Abstract
Early geometric learning depends on the child's level of thinking. In order to make geometric learning more meaningful for children, it is important for teachers to provide teaching and learning experiences suitable for children's thinking development level. For this, it is necessary to clearly know the level of thinking about the construction of geometric figures in children. Therefore, in this study, the thinking level of children expressed in geometric figure composition was analyzed. The research results are as follows. First, the percentage of correct answers for the tasks was the highest in the second year of elementary school, and it was a significant difference in the correct answer rate only for the puppy task between kindergarten and second year of elementary school. Second, as for the thinking level of children in the process of constructing geometric figures, kindergarten children aged 5 showed the highest thinking at the picture maker level, and the 1st and 2nd graders of elementary school had the most thinking at the shape composer level. Third, the average movement frequency of tangram piece was the highest at the picture maker level among the thinking levels. Only at the s piece assembler level, there was a significant difference between kindergarten and first-year elementary school students.
참고문헌 (31)
- Badger, T. M., "Puzzles-based learning of mathematics in engineering", Engineering Education, 8, pp.122~134 (2015)
- Bryant, P., "Paper 5 : Understanding Space and Its Representation in Mathematics" (2009), Nuffield Foundation
- Cheng, Y. L., "Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability", Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, pp.2~11 (2014)
- Clements, D. H., "Mathematics in the Early Years", pp.66~79 (1999), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- Clements, D. H., "Engaging Young Children in Mathematics: Standards for Early Childhood Mathematics Education", pp.267~297 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
- Clements, D. H., "Young Children’s Ideas about Geometric Shapes", Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, pp.482~488 (2000)
- Clements, D. H., "Early childhood teacher education : The case of geometry", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, pp.133~148 (2011)
- Clements, D. H., "Young children's concepts of shape", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, pp.192~212 (1999)
- Clements, D. H., "Young children’s compositions of geometric figures : A learning trajectory", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, pp.163~184 (2004)
- Duval, R., "Exploiting Mental Imagery with Computers in Mathematical Education", pp.142~157 (1995), Springer
- Duval, R., "The first crucial point in geometry learning : Visualization", Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1, pp.23~37 (2013)
- 강민정, "아동의 변환기하 문제해결에서 fNIRS에 의한 두뇌 활성 연구: Tangram 활용하여", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.485~497 (2020), 뇌기반교육연구소[DOI]
- 강민정, "변환기하 프로그램에서 아동의 두뇌 활성 및 기능적 연결성의 변화: fNIRS 연구", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(2), pp.199~213 (2021), 뇌기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Kaur, H., "Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles : Prototypicality and inclusion", ZDM, 47, pp.407~420 (2015)
- 홍혜경, "유아의 기하도형 합성과 분할의 발달적 수준", 유아교육연구, 27(6), pp.165~185 (2007), 한국유아교육학회[DOI]
- Lin, P. C., "The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children’s geometric", Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, pp.250~258 (2011)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and Standards for School Mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- Ozerem, A., "Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students", Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, pp.720~729 (2012)
- Renavitasari, R. D. I., "Log data analysis of player behavior in Tangram Puzzle learning game", International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12, pp.123~129 (2018)
- Saleem, T., "Effect of using tangram puzzles on the achievement of students in geometry at primary level", International Journal of Innovation on Teaching and Learning, 3, pp.1~19 (2017)
- Sarama, J., "Building Blocks for young children’s mathematical development", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, pp.93~110 (2002)
- Shaffer, R. D., "Developmental Psychology" (2010), Cengage Learning
- Soury-Lavergne, S., "Articulation of spatial and geometrical knowledge in problem solving with technology at primary school", ZDM, 47, pp.435~449 (2015)
- Tho, C. C., "Potential development geometric thinking for children through Tri Uan", Vietnam Journal of Education Sciences, 1, pp.52~57 (2020)
- Tian, X., "The art and mathematics of tangrams", Bridges 2012 : Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, pp.553~556 (2012)
- Tsai, M. J., "Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem : An eye-tracking analysis", Computers & Education, 58, pp.375~385 (2012)
- Uttal, D. H., "The malleability of spatial skills : A meta-analysis of training studies", Psychological Bulletin, 139, pp.352~402 (2013)
- Van Hiele, P. M., "Structure and Insight-A Theory of Mathematics Education" (1986), Academic Press
- Wu, D. B., "The distributions of Van Hiele levels of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th Graders", Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5, pp.409~416 (2006), PME
- Xistouri, X., "Spatial rotation and perspective taking abilities in relation to performance in reflective symmetry tasks", Proceedings of PME, 30, pp.425~432 (2006)
- Xistouri, X., "Primary school students’ structure and levels of abilities in transformational geometry", Proceedings of Relime, 17, pp.149~164 (2014)