본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국의 영업비밀 보호제도에 관한 연구 - 최고인민법원의 부정당경쟁해석을 중심으로 -

A Study on the protection system of trade secrets in China

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

After adopting Open & Reform policy in 1978, China has promoted the introduction of new technologies and policies for development of technologies and has legislated various acts for the purpose of socialist economic development. Amid these changes for the past years, due to international trends of protection of intellectual property rights and requests for protection of trade secrets from countries that have been investing capital and technologies in China, awareness for the necessity of protecting technological or managerial trade secrets has elevated in China. Due to the domestic and overseas request for protection of trade secrets, Anti-Unfair Competition Act was legislated and enacted on December 1, 1993. Based on the provisions related to unfair competition of Convention of Paris for the Protection of Industrial Property, this law was enacted in order to foster healthy development of socialist market economy and to protect rights and interests of businesses as well as of consumers; and this law defines concept of trade secrets, the subjects to be protected and conditions, acts of violating the law, etc. and recognizes civil remedies and administrative remedies, the key content of which is compensation for damages due to violation of trade secrets. Although this law is not specialized for the protection of intellectual property rights, the protection of intellectual property rights is a core part of the law. However, many problems have variously occurred in interpreting and applying Anti-Unfair Competition Act because of political and economic circumstances of China and problems in execution of the law. Accordingly, in order to establish consistent application standard of laws by specifically clarifying application standard of laws in detail, to protect related intellectual property rights, and maintaining fair market competition order, the Supreme People's Court promulgated "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Cases Involving Unfair Competition" on February 1, 2007 and has enforced it since then This paper aims to delve into the operation of trade secret protection system and interpretation of unfair competition by focusing on the codes of Anti-Unfair Competition Act of China.

Abstract

After adopting Open & Reform policy in 1978, China has promoted the introduction of new technologies and policies for development of technologies and has legislated various acts for the purpose of socialist economic development. Amid these changes for the past years, due to international trends of protection of intellectual property rights and requests for protection of trade secrets from countries that have been investing capital and technologies in China, awareness for the necessity of protecting technological or managerial trade secrets has elevated in China. Due to the domestic and overseas request for protection of trade secrets, Anti-Unfair Competition Act was legislated and enacted on December 1, 1993. Based on the provisions related to unfair competition of Convention of Paris for the Protection of Industrial Property, this law was enacted in order to foster healthy development of socialist market economy and to protect rights and interests of businesses as well as of consumers; and this law defines concept of trade secrets, the subjects to be protected and conditions, acts of violating the law, etc. and recognizes civil remedies and administrative remedies, the key content of which is compensation for damages due to violation of trade secrets. Although this law is not specialized for the protection of intellectual property rights, the protection of intellectual property rights is a core part of the law. However, many problems have variously occurred in interpreting and applying Anti-Unfair Competition Act because of political and economic circumstances of China and problems in execution of the law. Accordingly, in order to establish consistent application standard of laws by specifically clarifying application standard of laws in detail, to protect related intellectual property rights, and maintaining fair market competition order, the Supreme People's Court promulgated "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Cases Involving Unfair Competition" on February 1, 2007 and has enforced it since then This paper aims to delve into the operation of trade secret protection system and interpretation of unfair competition by focusing on the codes of Anti-Unfair Competition Act of China.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 倪才龙, "商业秘密保护法" (2005), 上海大学出版社
  2. 张耕, "商业秘密法" (2006), 厦门大学出版社
  3. 赵秉志, "侵犯知识产权罪疑难问题司法对策" (2000), 吉林人民出版社
  4. 吴汉东, "知识产权法" (2011), 中国政法大学出版社
  5. 刘春田, "知识产权法" (2009), 中国人民大学出版社
  6. 刘春田, "知识产权法" (2009), 法律出版社
  7. 沈德咏, "知识产权司法解释理解与适用" (2011), 法律出版社
  8. 孔祥俊, "商标与不正当竞争法" (2009), 法律出版社
  9. 孔祥俊, "最高人民法院知识产权司法解释理解与适用" (2012), 中国法制出版社
  10. 系晓明, "解读最高人民法院司法解释之知识产权卷" (2011), 人民法院出版社
  11. 陈骏彭林, "商业秘密司法保护的若干问题研究", 学习与实践, 4 (2013)
  12. 袁荷刚, "反思与重构: 我国商业秘密立法之完善", 法学杂志, 1 (2012)
  13. 童莎, "我国商业秘密法律保护制度探析", 法制与社会 (2011)
  14. 徐家力, "我国商业秘密的法律保护现状, 不足及立法建议", 保密科学技术 (2012)
  15. 孙仆, "商业秘密法律保护初探", 法制与社会 (2011)
  16. 史高嫣, "国内商业秘密保护法律法规的现状", 商务必读 (2012)
  17. 李哲, "论我国商业秘密法律保护制度的完善", 法制与社会 (2011)
  18. 刘介明, "我国商业秘密保护的法律现状及完善建议", 知识产权, 12 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)