수형자의 선거권보장에 관한 연구
The study of basic rights of prisoners to secure suffrage to prisoners
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Election is the core of democracy. Election is an act of electing national institutions to represent people as a sovereign to implement representative democracy based on national consensus. But once the final decision is made, prisoners lose the right to vote or the suffrage would be limited within the certain period of time according to the law. Prisoners file lawsuit against violation of the constitution on deprived voting rights and the pros and cons about suffrage of prisoners are going higher in various areas. In this study, to seek ways to give suffrage to prisoners, first, other countries' systems, history, precedent cases and the transition of precedent cases about restrictions on voting rights of prisoners are investigated. In this study, legislation system and way of restriction appear differently in each country. However, the changes of precedent cases and European Court of civil rights have concluded that suffrage should be granted to prisoners. Second, the pros and the cons about the legal status of prisoners and restrictions on suffrage are summarized. A group declared that Criminal Article 43 or Article 44 limiting suffrage of prisoners and Officials election Article 18 Paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 violated the Constitution and should be deleted. The other group declared that the legislative purpose should be acknowledged and the suffrage of prisoners should be limited at this moment. Third, problems and improvements of laws related to suffrage of prisoners are reviewed. Here, I would like to investigate the problems of provisions of natural suspension according to the current criminal laws, to investigate the legitimacy on provisions of natural suspension about the scope of limited suffrage of prisoners according to official election laws, to determine if it violates the principles of excessive regulation and to study the improvements on problems.
Abstract
Election is the core of democracy. Election is an act of electing national institutions to represent people as a sovereign to implement representative democracy based on national consensus. But once the final decision is made, prisoners lose the right to vote or the suffrage would be limited within the certain period of time according to the law. Prisoners file lawsuit against violation of the constitution on deprived voting rights and the pros and cons about suffrage of prisoners are going higher in various areas. In this study, to seek ways to give suffrage to prisoners, first, other countries' systems, history, precedent cases and the transition of precedent cases about restrictions on voting rights of prisoners are investigated. In this study, legislation system and way of restriction appear differently in each country. However, the changes of precedent cases and European Court of civil rights have concluded that suffrage should be granted to prisoners. Second, the pros and the cons about the legal status of prisoners and restrictions on suffrage are summarized. A group declared that Criminal Article 43 or Article 44 limiting suffrage of prisoners and Officials election Article 18 Paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 violated the Constitution and should be deleted. The other group declared that the legislative purpose should be acknowledged and the suffrage of prisoners should be limited at this moment. Third, problems and improvements of laws related to suffrage of prisoners are reviewed. Here, I would like to investigate the problems of provisions of natural suspension according to the current criminal laws, to investigate the legitimacy on provisions of natural suspension about the scope of limited suffrage of prisoners according to official election laws, to determine if it violates the principles of excessive regulation and to study the improvements on problems.
참고문헌 (30)
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2010), 박영사
- 박균성, "행정법론(상) 제7판" (2008), 박영사
- 박균성, "행형학" (2002), 홍문사
- 박균성, "형사정책" (2005), 홍문사
- 박균성, "형법총론" (2004), 홍문사
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2003), 법문사
- 차봉근, "교정학의 정원" (2002), 신흥인터내셔날
- 중앙선거관리위원회, "외국의 선거제도비교분석집 1-2", 중앙선거관리위원회, ~ (2005)
- 김완수, "수형자의 법적 지위와 권리보호에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 김현철, "공직선거 및 선거부정방지법 제18조 위헌확인 -수형자 선거권 제한의 과잉금지원칙위반 여부", 판례집 16-1, 468~
- 박재윤, "수형자의 법적 지위에 관한 연구 -수형자의 권리와 권리구제제도를 중심으로-", 박사, pp.1991
- 朴陽彬, "受刑者의 權利", 법조, 51(1), pp.42~79 (2002), 법조협회
- 서보학, "형사제재로서의 명예형(자격형)은 존치되어야 하는가?", 형사법연구, (10) (1997), 한국형사법학회
- 오경식, "교도소 수형자의 선거권 부여 방안에 대한 연구", 矯正硏究, 36, pp.43~69 (2007), 한국교정학회
- 이호중, "수형자의 선거권 제한의 위헌성", 비교형사법연구, 11(1), pp.329~362 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회
- 윤상로, "수형자의 개방처우에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 장영수, "수형자의 선거권 제한(공직선거법 제18조 제1항 제2호)의 합헌성 여부에 대한 검토", 고려법학, (54), pp.65~85 (2009), 법학연구원
- 장영수, "수형자의 선거권 제한... 입법자의 정책적 판단에 대한 위헌심사의 범위는 어디까지인가 -헌법재판소 2009. 10. 29. 2007헌마1462 결정에 대한 평석-", 고시계, 55(5)통권 : 639 (2010), 고시계사
- 정진수, "수형자의 법적 권리에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 정승환, "행형법에서 계호의 체계적 지위와 계구사용의 요건", 형사정책연구, 16(1), pp.93~126 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 최준, "수형자의 법적지위에 관한 연구", 교정복지연구, 1 (2005), 한국교정복지학회
- 한인섭, "재소자의 인권과 처우, In 법과 사회 제3권" (1990), 창작과 비평사
- Alec C. Ewald, "ʻCivil Deathʼ The Ideological Paradox of Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in theUnited States", Wis. L. Rev, ~ (2002)
- Behan, C, "ʻPrisoners, Politics and the Polls: Enfranchisement and the burden ofresponsibilityʼ", British Journal of Criminology, 48 (2008)
- Chemerinsky E., "Constitutional Law" (2002), Aspen Law & Business
- Kaiser, G, "Strafvollzug, 4. Aufl." (1992)
- Nora V. Demlietner, "Continuing Payment on Oneʼs Debt to Society: The German Model ofDisenfranchisement as an Altemative", Minn. L. Rev, 84, pp.753~ (2000)
- Roger Clegg, "Who Should Vote?", ~ (2001)
- Susan E. Marquardt, "ʻDeprivation of a Felon's Right to Vote: Constitutional Concerns, PolicyIssues and Suggested Reform for Felony Disenfranchisement Lawʼ", U. Det. Mercy L. Rev, 82, pp.279~ (2005), University of DetroitMercy Law Review
- 中山硏一, "刑事政策講座 Ⅱ", ~ (1962)