본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정보사회의 음란물 규제체계 개편에 대한 일고

Study on reform of obscenity regulation systemin information society

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

South Korea prohibits the absolute distribution of obscenity, has adopted a legislative attention. The problem of the concept of obscenity or the judge does not set standards and norms. Normative concept of obscenity as only two elements, rather than foreign as well as a narrative element 'is that it should be redefined as. Also criminal laws on obscenity to discuss unification or integration is needed. In information society, there is a limit not to adopt the control theory because the sexual expression have several types, and there are many opportunities to use the materials easily. It is necessary to improvement a new legal theory to a new environment. Also It needs a new attempt and legislative skill which correspond to each legal purpose. This precedent did not change the regulation system against the obscenity fundamentally. But this strengthen a adaptability to obscene expression in modern society when Supreme Court applied a strict and definite judgment standards to this precedent. Supreme Court added requirements as follows, the expression must be the degree of an outrage of human decency and must have no literary and artistic value. These requirements are more reinforcement and strict than a past standards. Also this precedent was very impressive in that the legal purpose of regulation against obscenity were not only the protect of sex ethics but also the minor protection and the right of self-determination on obscenity materials. The intent of this precedent are important in that point not only the suggestion of the strict standards but also the rethinking of the regulation purpose of obscenity in new environment.

Abstract

South Korea prohibits the absolute distribution of obscenity, has adopted a legislative attention. The problem of the concept of obscenity or the judge does not set standards and norms. Normative concept of obscenity as only two elements, rather than foreign as well as a narrative element 'is that it should be redefined as. Also criminal laws on obscenity to discuss unification or integration is needed. In information society, there is a limit not to adopt the control theory because the sexual expression have several types, and there are many opportunities to use the materials easily. It is necessary to improvement a new legal theory to a new environment. Also It needs a new attempt and legislative skill which correspond to each legal purpose. This precedent did not change the regulation system against the obscenity fundamentally. But this strengthen a adaptability to obscene expression in modern society when Supreme Court applied a strict and definite judgment standards to this precedent. Supreme Court added requirements as follows, the expression must be the degree of an outrage of human decency and must have no literary and artistic value. These requirements are more reinforcement and strict than a past standards. Also this precedent was very impressive in that the legal purpose of regulation against obscenity were not only the protect of sex ethics but also the minor protection and the right of self-determination on obscenity materials. The intent of this precedent are important in that point not only the suggestion of the strict standards but also the rethinking of the regulation purpose of obscenity in new environment.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김병수, "영화・영상물의 음란성 판단기준", 법학연구, 46(1) (2005)
  2. 음란물의 법적 규제 및 대책에 관한 연구, "김영환", ~, pp.한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서 (1991)
  3. 김종서, "인터넷상의 음란물 규제 기준 비교 연구: 비판적 관점", 민주법학, 24, pp.8~246 (2003), 민주주의법학연구회
  4. 김성천, "형법" (2009), 소진
  5. 인터넷상 청소년보호에 관한 법제 연구, "김성천", ~, pp.방송통신위원회 연구보고서 (2010)
  6. 김호석, "누가 표현의 자유를 억압하는가" (2002), 한울
  7. 컴퓨터통신을 통한 음란물 접촉실태와 대책, "노성호", ~, pp.한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서 (1998)
  8. 류화진, "인터넷 음란 동영상과 관련한 음란의 개념", 영산법률논총, 5(1) (2008)
  9. 문재완, "음란과 헌법상 표현의 자유의 보호영역 - 헌재 2009. 5. 28. 2007헌바83결정을 중심으로 -", 언론과 법, 8(2), pp.293~329 (2009), (사)한국언론법학회
  10. 박상진, "음란물죄의 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 7(1), pp.163~180 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
  11. 박이규, "정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률상 음란의 의미 및 그 판단 기준", 대법원판례해설, (76) (2008)
  12. 박재윤, "주석 형법 제4판", pp.73~ (2006), 한국사법행정학회
  13. 박혜진, "형법상 음란행위의 ‘음란성’과 그 판단기준에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 대법원 2009. 2. 26. 선고 2006도3119 판결을 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 11(1), pp.461~484 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회
  14. 황성기, "인터넷 포털사이트를 통해 유통되는 VOD서비스의 음란성에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 8(2), pp.21~44 (2007), 법학연구소
  15. 황창근, "해외 인터넷사이트에 대한 행정적 규제의 정당성", 창작과법, 1(1) (2007)
  16. 방송통신심의위원회, "통신심의 관련 판례집", 방송통신심의위원회, ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)