현행 기관소송제도에 관한 소고 -심사대상과 범위를 중심으로-
A Study on the Agency Litigation -Focusing on the Subject and Range of Review-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When a dispute occurs in relation to the "agency's authority", Agency Litigation by the Administrative Litigation Act and Adjudication on Competence Disputes by the Constitutional Court Act exist as the means to resolve a dispute. Both have allowed many problems since their introduction and despite the various suggested solutions, there has been little progress in terms of administrating system and legislation. In the perspective of Administrative Law, every issue of dispute settlement system in terms of contestation concludes as the means to activate Agency Litigation. These issues include whether or not to define Agency Litigation as disputes between 'two agencies within equal legal bodies' and abolish the principle of legality of Agency Litigation, and the establishment of relation between Adjudication on Competence Disputes and Agency Litigation, etc. These disputes originate, for Adjudication on Competence Disputes has been governing administrative dispute as well as constitutional dispute between the agencies. These do not accord with the essence and purpose of the Constitutional Adjudication System thereby limiting the area of Agency Litigation that tries to avoid the overlap with Adjudication on Competence Disputes. The Supreme Court in 2004 and the Justice Department in 2012 have tried to extend the object and scope of Agency Litigation by amending the Administrative Litigation Act. Both amendment bill focused on abolishing the principle of legality of Agency Litigation. However, these efforts reveal limitations, for these took place before the definitive establishment of relation between Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes that accords with the respective Dispute Settlement System. The essence and purpose to introduce the system concerned should be focused to resolve the problems related to Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes. Accordingly, systematic improvement is suggested to have Adjudication on Competence Disputes undertake constitutional dispute between the agencies and Agency.
Abstract
When a dispute occurs in relation to the "agency's authority", Agency Litigation by the Administrative Litigation Act and Adjudication on Competence Disputes by the Constitutional Court Act exist as the means to resolve a dispute. Both have allowed many problems since their introduction and despite the various suggested solutions, there has been little progress in terms of administrating system and legislation. In the perspective of Administrative Law, every issue of dispute settlement system in terms of contestation concludes as the means to activate Agency Litigation. These issues include whether or not to define Agency Litigation as disputes between 'two agencies within equal legal bodies' and abolish the principle of legality of Agency Litigation, and the establishment of relation between Adjudication on Competence Disputes and Agency Litigation, etc. These disputes originate, for Adjudication on Competence Disputes has been governing administrative dispute as well as constitutional dispute between the agencies. These do not accord with the essence and purpose of the Constitutional Adjudication System thereby limiting the area of Agency Litigation that tries to avoid the overlap with Adjudication on Competence Disputes. The Supreme Court in 2004 and the Justice Department in 2012 have tried to extend the object and scope of Agency Litigation by amending the Administrative Litigation Act. Both amendment bill focused on abolishing the principle of legality of Agency Litigation. However, these efforts reveal limitations, for these took place before the definitive establishment of relation between Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes that accords with the respective Dispute Settlement System. The essence and purpose to introduce the system concerned should be focused to resolve the problems related to Agency Litigation and Adjudication on Competence Disputes. Accordingly, systematic improvement is suggested to have Adjudication on Competence Disputes undertake constitutional dispute between the agencies and Agency.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강현호, "행정법총론" (2005), 박영사
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2009), 법문사
- 김남진, "행정법(Ⅰ)" (2012), 법문사
- 김도창, "일반행정법론(上)" (1993), 청운사
- 김동희, "행정법(Ⅰ)" (2012), 박영사
- 김철용, "행정법" (2012), 고시계사
- 박균성, "행정법론(上)" (2012), 박영사
- 석종현, "일반행정법(상), 제12판" (2009), 삼영사
- 성낙인, "헌법학 제9판" (2009), 법문사
- 전광석, "한국헌법론 제7판" (2011), 집현재
- 정하중, "행정법개론" (2013), 법문사
- 한수웅, "헌법학" (2011), 법문사
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2011), 박영사
- 홍강훈, "(로스쿨) 객관식 행정법특강" (2012), 박영사
- 김기진, "지방자치단체의 사법적 구제", 연세법학연구, 5(1) (1998)
- 김상태, "권한쟁의심판과 기관소송의 관계정립 방안", 한양법학, (22), pp.160~177 (2008), 한양법학회
- 김상태, "지방자치단체의 자치권 침해에 대한 사법적 구제수단 ― 국가와 지방자치단체와의 관계를 중심으로 ―", 행정법연구, 24, pp.237~269 (2009), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 김운용, "국가기관 상호간의 권한쟁의심판", 헌법재판연구, 3 (1991), 헌법재판소
- 김학성, "권한쟁의심판의 문제점과 권한쟁의심판과 행정소송과의 관할권 경합", 강원법학, 33, pp.85~111 (2011), 비교법학연구소
- 박균성, "行政訴訟法의 改正에 따른 主要 爭點", 공법학연구, 6(1), pp.177~211 (2005), 한국비교공법학회
- 박승호, "행정소송법상 기관소송에 관한 쟁점", 공법연구, 27(3) (1999)
- 박승호, "독일의 행정법상 기관소송", 안암법학, (9) (1999)
- 백윤기, "권한쟁의심판과 기관소송, In 한국헌법학의 현황과 과제(금랑김철수교수정년기념논문집)" (1998), 박영사
- 송영천, "지방자치제시행과 관련한 각종 쟁송의 제문제", 저스티스, 35(5)통권 : 69 (2002)
- 신봉기, "권한쟁의심판의 당사자", 법률신문, ~ (1991)
- 신봉기, "기관소송의 폐지에 관한 일고", 고시연구, 22(12) (1995)
- 辛奉起, "機關 紛爭 및 爭訟에 관한 硏究- 行政訴訟法 改正方向과 관련하여 -", 토지공법연구, 16(1), pp.14~356 (2002), 한국토지공법학회
- 신봉기, "기관소송", 법학논고, 24 (2006), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 안성경, "기관소송과 권한쟁의심판과의 관계 정립에 관한 연구", 헌법학연구, 14(3), pp.445~470 (2008), 한국헌법학회
- 이기우, "기관소송", 고시계, 37(11) (1992)
- 정하중, "지방자치단체 기관상호간의 분쟁에 대한 행정소송", 안암법학, (7) (1998)
- 정호경, "행정소송과 헌법재판의 관계에 관한 고찰 ― 항고소송, 헌법소원, 권한쟁의심판을 중심으로 ―", 행정법연구, (22), pp.55~80 (2008), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 최봉석, "지방자치 관련 사법심사의 제도적 현황과 개혁과제", 공법연구, 32(5), pp.759~785 (2004), 한국공법학회
- 최승원, "權限爭義審判과 機關訴訟", 법학논집, 4(4), pp.121~138 (2000), 법학연구소
- 최완주, "헌법재판제도의 재구성 - 사법분열 방지를 위한 방안을 중심으로", 법조, 55(3), pp.19~60 (2006), 법조협회
- 최희수, "헌법재판의 본질과 헌법재판소의 헌법상 편제 - 헌법개정 논의에 부쳐 -", 공법학연구, 9(4), pp.161~187 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 한견우, "기관소송의 기능에 관한 재검토와 기관소송의 절차", 연세법학연구, (3) (1995)
- 홍정선, "기관소송", 고시계, 36(8) (1991)
- 홍정선, "권한쟁의심판의 관념, In 헌법재판의 이론과 실제(김철수교수화갑기념논문집)" (1993), 박영사
- 홍정선, "기관소송의 법리", 공법연구, 25(4) (1997)
- Christian Hillgruber, "Verfassungsprozessrecht" (2006)
- Friedhelm Hufen, "Verwaltungsprozessrecht" (2008)
- Hartmut Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" (2009)
- Kopp, "VwGO" (2005)
- Michael Sachs, "Grundgesetz" (2003)
- Wolfgang Roth, "Verwaltungsrechtlche Organstreitigkeiten" (2001)
- Wolf-Rüdiger Schenke, "Verwaltungsprozessrecht" (2005)