기부채납 부담계약에 대한 쟁송방법
Litigation methods to the burden contract of the contributed acceptance
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The contributed acceptance is usually added to a beneficial administrative act as the form of “Nebenbestimmung”. But it has increased to add it as the form of agreement or contract these days. The burden contract of contributed acceptance has a characteristic of substitute for the burden as administrative act. The main administrative act relating to the burden contract is based on public law. Therefore, it should be evaluated as a public contract and dealt accordingly. In the same line, a complainant should be conducted through “allgemeine Leistungsklage” or “Feststellungsklage” as party suit. If the party defaults on the burden contract, the adminstrative agency is able to file “allgemeine Leistungsklage”. If it is defective on the burden contract, either party is able to nullify the contract through “Feststellungsklage”. Even if the main administrative act is valid, the burden contact can be partially invalidated or terminated. At this point, the theory of “partial revocation of administrative act” can be analogically applied.
Abstract
The contributed acceptance is usually added to a beneficial administrative act as the form of “Nebenbestimmung”. But it has increased to add it as the form of agreement or contract these days. The burden contract of contributed acceptance has a characteristic of substitute for the burden as administrative act. The main administrative act relating to the burden contract is based on public law. Therefore, it should be evaluated as a public contract and dealt accordingly. In the same line, a complainant should be conducted through “allgemeine Leistungsklage” or “Feststellungsklage” as party suit. If the party defaults on the burden contract, the adminstrative agency is able to file “allgemeine Leistungsklage”. If it is defective on the burden contract, either party is able to nullify the contract through “Feststellungsklage”. Even if the main administrative act is valid, the burden contact can be partially invalidated or terminated. At this point, the theory of “partial revocation of administrative act” can be analogically applied.
참고문헌 (20)
- 길준규, "행정법입문" (2011), 박영사
- 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" (2009), 법문사
- 김대인, "행정계약법의 이해" (2007), 경인문화사
- 김도창, "일반행정법론(상)" (1995), 청운사
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2009), 박영사
- 류지태, "행정법신론" (2009), 박영사
- 정형근, "최신행정법강의(상)" (2009), 박영사
- 박정훈, "행정법의 체계와 방법론" (2005), 박영사
- 정하중, "행정법개론" (2010), 법문사
- 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" (2011), 박영사
- 김경란, "행정청이 수익적 행정처분을 하면서 사전에 상대방과 체결한 협약상의 의무를 부담으로 부가하였는데, 부담의 전제가 된 주된 행정처분의근거 법령이 개정되어 부관을 붙일 수 없게 된 경우, 위 협약의 효력", 대법원판례해설, (37) (2009)
- 김남진, "교섭․합의에 의한 부관의 효력", 행정판례연구, 2 (1996), 청운사
- 김대인, "계약의 형식으로 된 부관의 법률관계 ― 대법원 2009. 2. 12 선고 2005다65500판결에 대한 판례평석 ―", 행정법연구, (26), pp.417~436 (2010), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 김중권, "‘송유관이설협약’의 법적 성질에 관한 소고", 법률신문, (3613) (2007)
- 柳至泰, "寄附採納行爲에 대한 現行 判例檢討", 토지공법연구, 11(11), pp.53~70 (2001), 한국토지공법학회
- 송영천, "기부채납과 토지형질변경행위허가", 인권과 정의, (259) (1998), 대한변호사협회
- 이영무, "건축허가에 부수해서 부과된 기부채납 부관의 허용성과 그 효력", 민사법연구, 9 (2001)
- 전영준, "행정행위에 부가된 '부담계약'의 법적 문제에 관한 연구 : 우리나라 실무상 문제를 중심으로", 석사, 행정법, pp.2010
- Detterbeck, Steffen, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 7. Aufl." (2009), C. H. Beck
- Maurer, Hartmut, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 17. Aufl." (2009), C. H. Beck