정신질환자 비자의 입원과 기본권 제한 - 비자의 입원시 신상정보확인의 적법절차를 중심으로 -
Involuntary Admission of the Patients with Mental Illness and Infringement of the Fundamental Rights - To Focus on the Process of Confirming the Information of the Patients’ Identity -
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In case of involuntary admission and emergency admission, it could be happened that nobody knows who patient with mental illness is. It is required to confirm the information about the patient who wants to take Health care service for recording the medical record and providing proper treatment by doctor. However, when there isn’t any clue for confirming the patient identify except finger print, we have to choose whether using the finger print for searching the patient identity or not. This study is dealing with the necessity of confirming the patients identity when they enter in hospital by the way through involuntary admission or emergency admission. In addition, it could be accepted to use finger print when it is the last way to confirm the patients identity,comparing degree of the liberty of body’s infringe to necessity of taking proper health care service. And in that time, who has the responsibility to the problem which could occur on the process of confirming . In conclusion, this study propose that the way of correcting the informaiont by patient’s finger print should be accepted because of the necessity for provinding proper health care service to the patient with mental illness. And Mayor due to take the responsibility through the whole process of the confirming the information of the patient’s identity.
Abstract
In case of involuntary admission and emergency admission, it could be happened that nobody knows who patient with mental illness is. It is required to confirm the information about the patient who wants to take Health care service for recording the medical record and providing proper treatment by doctor. However, when there isn’t any clue for confirming the patient identify except finger print, we have to choose whether using the finger print for searching the patient identity or not. This study is dealing with the necessity of confirming the patients identity when they enter in hospital by the way through involuntary admission or emergency admission. In addition, it could be accepted to use finger print when it is the last way to confirm the patients identity,comparing degree of the liberty of body’s infringe to necessity of taking proper health care service. And in that time, who has the responsibility to the problem which could occur on the process of confirming . In conclusion, this study propose that the way of correcting the informaiont by patient’s finger print should be accepted because of the necessity for provinding proper health care service to the patient with mental illness. And Mayor due to take the responsibility through the whole process of the confirming the information of the patient’s identity.
참고문헌 (23)
- "정신보건법 제3조 제1호", ~
- 신권철, "정신질환자 개념의 규범적 고찰", 법조, 59(5), pp.35~76 (2010), 법조협회[DOI]
- "서울고등법원 2011. 2. 18. 선고 2010나55240판결", ~ (2011)
- "대법원 2006. 7. 28. 선고 2004다759판결", ~ (2006)
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2011), 법문사
- "헌법재판소 1999. 4. 29. 94헌바37등", ~ (1999)
- "대법원 1998.1.23, 선고, 97도2124, 판결", ~ (1998)
- "헌법재판소 2005.5.26, 99헌마513", ~ (2005)
- 주민등록제도 발전방안 연구 최종보고서, "송희준", 행정안전부, ~ (2007)
- "구 정신보건법(2000. 1. 12. 법률 제6152호", ~ (2000)
- "대법원 2001. 2. 23. 선고 2000도4415 판결", ~ (2001)
- "「개인정보보호법」제15조", ~
- 김양규, "홈리스에 대한 경찰법적인 보호 규제 방안", 석사, 사법치안행정, pp.2008
- "주민등록법 제29조(열람 또는 등ㆍ초본의 교부)", ~
- "주민등록법 제30조(주민등록전산정보자료의 이용 등)", ~
- "서울중앙지방법원 2010. 5. 12. 선고 2008가합87704판결", ~ (2010)
- 홍정선, "행정법원론", pp.256~ (2011), 박영사
- "대법원 1995. 4. 25. 선고 94다27151 판결", ~ (1995)
- "대법원 2002. 5. 28. 선고 2000다46511 판결", ~ (2002)
- 최현태, "自己決定能力障碍者 保護를 위한 成年後見制度에 대한 立法論的 考察", 법학연구, (39), pp.135~154 (2010), 한국법학회
- 김문근, "성년후견법률에 나타난 의사결정능력의 개념에 관한 연구 - 영국 정신능력법(Mental Capacity Act, 2005)을 중심으로 -", 사회복지연구, 41(3), pp.241~269 (2010), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
- 백승흠, "정신능력법제에 관한 연구 -성년자후견제도를 중심으로-", 청주법학, 31, pp.89~108 (2009)
- "경찰관직무집행법 제4조", ~
