임베디드 소프트웨어의 결함과 제조물책임 적용에 관한 고찰
A Study on Application of Product Liability to Defect of Embedded Software
0
조회
0
다운로드
61
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Liability about damage due to defect of software is being maintained as legal disputes. Compensation for further damage due to the defects of software is first, under default of obligation of Civil Law, Article 390, assuming contract relation between person directly related. Second, it is under responsibility of illegal Civil Law, Article 750 that should prove negligence/intention of assailant regardless of contract relation between person directly related and defects liability under Civil Law, Article 580. Also, there is Product Liability that applies liability without fault to compensation for damages due to product defect. The problem is that to establish defects of Embedded Software requires high-degree of professional ability. Embedded Software is developed by skilled programmers, and it is hard for normal consumers to know the complexity of Embedded Software combined with elaborate IT devices and electronics. Therefore, by putting liability without fault regardless of contract relation on Product Liability Law, it has a different signification in the point that it can solve the existing limitation of compensation for damage due to the defects of Embedded Software. Because it is not obvious to consider Embedded Software as assets on Civil Law with the current Product Liability Law, Embedded Software that performs independent functions, equipped in part of particular product, has to stipulate on definition of product on Product Liability Law. As similar legislation case, in Product Liability Law and Council Directive(1999/34/EC), as amended in 1999 of Germany, because it determines that it contains electricity, an immaterial being, in products, it is under Product Liability Law. Because it is difficult for consumers to understand the complexity of Embedded Software that is developed by skilled software technicians and which is combined with cars, IT devices, or electronics, it is urgent to relax burden of proof about causal relationship of occurrence of damage and presence of defects on Product Liability Law. It needs legislation estimating that defects of products and further damage due to accident are due to defects of the products, when consumers confirm that 1) the fact that an accident occurs under exclusive control of manufacturer 2) the fact that an accident does not happen without mistake of manufacturers or third-party, although the consumers use the product in normal ways and get further damage from the accident.
Abstract
Liability about damage due to defect of software is being maintained as legal disputes. Compensation for further damage due to the defects of software is first, under default of obligation of Civil Law, Article 390, assuming contract relation between person directly related. Second, it is under responsibility of illegal Civil Law, Article 750 that should prove negligence/intention of assailant regardless of contract relation between person directly related and defects liability under Civil Law, Article 580. Also, there is Product Liability that applies liability without fault to compensation for damages due to product defect. The problem is that to establish defects of Embedded Software requires high-degree of professional ability. Embedded Software is developed by skilled programmers, and it is hard for normal consumers to know the complexity of Embedded Software combined with elaborate IT devices and electronics. Therefore, by putting liability without fault regardless of contract relation on Product Liability Law, it has a different signification in the point that it can solve the existing limitation of compensation for damage due to the defects of Embedded Software. Because it is not obvious to consider Embedded Software as assets on Civil Law with the current Product Liability Law, Embedded Software that performs independent functions, equipped in part of particular product, has to stipulate on definition of product on Product Liability Law. As similar legislation case, in Product Liability Law and Council Directive(1999/34/EC), as amended in 1999 of Germany, because it determines that it contains electricity, an immaterial being, in products, it is under Product Liability Law. Because it is difficult for consumers to understand the complexity of Embedded Software that is developed by skilled software technicians and which is combined with cars, IT devices, or electronics, it is urgent to relax burden of proof about causal relationship of occurrence of damage and presence of defects on Product Liability Law. It needs legislation estimating that defects of products and further damage due to accident are due to defects of the products, when consumers confirm that 1) the fact that an accident occurs under exclusive control of manufacturer 2) the fact that an accident does not happen without mistake of manufacturers or third-party, although the consumers use the product in normal ways and get further damage from the accident.
참고문헌 (52)
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙(민법강의Ⅰ)" (2002), 박영사
- 제조물책임법 개정방안 연구, "박동진", 법무부·공정거래위원회, ~ (2012)
- 손병희, "유비쿼터스 개론 개념과 기술" (2009), 도서출판 ITC
- 양창수, "독일민법전" (2005), 博英社
- 디지털정보 거래 성립에 관한 연구, "오병철", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2001)
- 오병철, "전자거래법" (2000), 법원사
- 이영준, "물권법" (2009), 박영사
- 임베디드SW 산업 생태계 개선을 위한 표준(하도급)계약서 개발 최종보고서, "산업통상자원부", ~ (2014)
- 임베디드 SW 경쟁력 강화방안 연구, "산업통상자원부", ~ (2013)
- 센서산업 발전전략, "산업통상자원부", ~ (2012)
- 국내 임베디드 SW산업 실태조사에 관한 연구 최종보고서, "한국소프트웨어진흥원", ~ (2004)
- 콘텐츠 이용자 보호를 위한 법제 개선 방향, "한국콘텐츠진흥원", KOCCA, ~, pp.10-45 (2010)
- 김두진, "제조물책임법의 효율성에 관한 고찰", 비교사법, 9(3), pp.~28 (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 김민동, "개선될 수 없는 설계상 결함의 제조물책임", 안암법학, 통(25), pp.669~691 (2007), 안암법학회
- 김민중, "미래인터넷에서 콘텐츠의 보호와 관련한 이슈에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 32, pp.49~86 (2011), 부설법학연구소
- 김민중, "컴퓨터바이러스에 따른 손해에 대한 법적 책임", 인터넷법률, (18) (2003), 법무부
- 박규용, "의약품과 의료제조물의 결함에 대한 제조사의 책임 - 불법행위책임과 위험책임의 구조를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 15(2), pp.231~260 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 박수곤, "프랑스민법상 물건의 개념 -동산과 부동산의 구별-", 민사법학, 63(2), pp.15~44 (2013), 한국민사법학회
- 박운길, "불법행위에 있어서 인과관계의 역할", 법학연구, (19), pp.155~174 (2005), 한국법학회
- 배대헌, "거래대상으로서의 디지털정보와 ‘물건’ 개념 확대에 대한 검토", 상사판례연구, (14) (2003), 한국상사판례학회
- 디지털재산으로서 정보와 ‘물건’의 개념 확대에 대한 검토, 지식정보사회 구현을 위한 디지털 법제의 정비방안, "배대헌", 정보통신정책연구원·한국재산법학회, ~ (2002)
- 신봉근, "컴퓨터소프트웨어와 製造物責任", 선진상사법률연구, (27), pp.103~130 (2005), 법무부
- 알랭 구리오, "무체재산에 대한 담보물권(새로운 재산)", 저스티스, 141, pp.232~260 (2014), 한국법학원
- 연기영, "제조물책임법의 제정경과와 주요내용", 민사법학, (23) (2003), 한국민사법학회
- 윤진수, "제조물책임의 주요 쟁점- 최근의 논의를 중심으로", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.1~55 (2011), 법학연구원
- 이상수, "소프트웨어에 대한 製造物責任 硏究", 박사, pp.2015
- 이상수, "스마트태그(RFID)와 제조물책임", 아주법학, 8(2), pp.227~253 (2014), 법학연구소
- 이상정, "제조물책임법 제정의 의의와 향후과제", 저스티스, 35(4) (2002), 한국법학원
- 이용석, "PL保險의 本質과 構造", 경남법학, (12) (1996), 경남대학교 법학연구소
- 이충훈, "인터넷通信販賣業者의 製造物責任 適用 與否: 韓國과 美國의 製造物責任法을 中心으로", 통상법률, (45), pp.163~195 (2002), 법무부
- 장재옥, "전파법상의 전파의 개념과 법적성질", 중앙법학, 13(3), pp.89~118 (2011), 중앙법학회
- 전병석, "판례를 통해 본 미국의 제조물책임 법리의 발전 -엄격책임의 성립과 제조물의결함", 법률행정논총, 22(2) (2002), 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 주지홍, "소프트웨어하자로 인한 손해의 제조물책임법리 적용여부", 민사법학, (25), pp.433~462 (2004), 한국민사법학회
- 차성민, "정보통신업에서의 제조물책임", 법조, 55(1), pp.245~268 (2006), 법조협회
- 최병록, "전기의 제조물책임", 민사법학, (32), pp.273~308 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 최완식, "법원판례를 通하여 본 美國의 航空機製造者責任", 국제법학회논총, 35(2) (1990), 대한국제법학회
- 허명국, "표준 컴퓨터 프로그램 거래의 법적 성질 - 라이선스설 및 혼합계약설에 대한 비판적 입장에서 -", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.21~69 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 허명국, "컴퓨터 프로그램 거래의 법적 성질에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2009
- Brannigan, "Liability for Personal Injuries Caused by Defective Medical Computer Programs", Am. J.L & Med, 7, pp.123~ (1981)
- Christopher Hodges, "Product Liability European Laws and Practice" (1993), Sweet & Maxwell
- David G. Owen, "Product Liability Law" (2008)
- Geraint G. Howells, "Is European Products Liability More Protective Than the restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability?", Tenn. L. Rev, 65, pp.985~ (1988)
- OS-II: The Real-Time Kernel, "MicroC", pp.1996, Jean Labrosse
- Michael J. Moore, "Promoting Safety through Workers' Compensation: The Efficiency and Net Wage Costs of Injury Insurance", RAND Jounal of Economics, 20(4) (1989)
- Nathan D. Leadstrom, "Internet Web Sites as Products Under Strict Products Liability : A Call for Expanded Definition of Product", Washburn L.J, 40, pp.532~ (2001)
- "Strict Products Liability and Computer Software: Caveat Vendor", Computer, 1983, pp.4, 373~
- Remy Card, "The Linux Kernel Book" (1998), John Wiley & Sons
- Christoph A Baus, "Verwendungsbeschränkungen in Softwareüberlassungsverträgen" (2004)
- Josef Esser, "Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil, Teilband 2" (2000)
- 小林秀之, "製造物責任法" (1995), 新世社
- 内布 光, "IT社会における企業取引法" (2011), 商事法務
- 坂村 健, "ユビキタス・コンピュータ革命――次世代社会の世界標準" (2002), 角川書店