징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성
Acceptability of Concept of Punitive Damages
0
조회
0
다운로드
22
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Under contemporary torts, compensatory damages is not a sufficient remedy for the victim. The punitive damages is the necessary policy measure to improve the problems of current circumstances against torts. The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer and to deter that person and others from similar tort in the future. Therefore the punitive damages may not be suitable for our legal system and practice. If the damages from illegal conduct are confined to the victim's losses, the inherent deterrent effect of compensatory damages may be sufficient. However, when illegal conduct gives rise to profits that are greater than the damages incurred by the victim, a purely compensatory system of damages will fail to provide adequate deterrence. German law has had and still has a difficulty of openly accepting punitive damages as part of its legal system. But since the necessity of accepting punitive damages has increased, punitive damages have been applied to such broad areas that they can be considered exceptional. Certain areas such as infringement of the right of personality and employment discrimination based on gender cases are frequently governed by the notion of deterrence, which results in damages that are not purely compensatory. The noncompensatory and punitive elements of German law on damages is increasing. The introduction of the concept of punitive damages may be difficult in our civil law system, but this issue must be resolved through legislation of punitive damages in certain areas.
Abstract
Under contemporary torts, compensatory damages is not a sufficient remedy for the victim. The punitive damages is the necessary policy measure to improve the problems of current circumstances against torts. The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer and to deter that person and others from similar tort in the future. Therefore the punitive damages may not be suitable for our legal system and practice. If the damages from illegal conduct are confined to the victim's losses, the inherent deterrent effect of compensatory damages may be sufficient. However, when illegal conduct gives rise to profits that are greater than the damages incurred by the victim, a purely compensatory system of damages will fail to provide adequate deterrence. German law has had and still has a difficulty of openly accepting punitive damages as part of its legal system. But since the necessity of accepting punitive damages has increased, punitive damages have been applied to such broad areas that they can be considered exceptional. Certain areas such as infringement of the right of personality and employment discrimination based on gender cases are frequently governed by the notion of deterrence, which results in damages that are not purely compensatory. The noncompensatory and punitive elements of German law on damages is increasing. The introduction of the concept of punitive damages may be difficult in our civil law system, but this issue must be resolved through legislation of punitive damages in certain areas.
참고문헌 (37)
- 고세일, "대륙법에서 징벌적 손해배상 논의- 민법의 관점에서 -", 법조, 63(1), pp.142~190 (2014), 법조협회
- 공정거래법 및 소비자관련법상 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입방안 연구, "김두진", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
- 김성돈, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 법이론적 문제점과 그 극복방안", 성균관법학, 25(4), pp.281~298 (2013), 법학연구소
- 김재국, "징벌적 손해배상", 민사법연구, (5) (1996), 대한민사법학회
- 김제완, "징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성(Ι)" (2007), 한국법제연구원
- 김현수, "미국법상 징벌적 손해배상 - 근대법 형성기 법리의 전개와 제한요소를 중심으로 -", 재산법연구, 29(2), pp.325~355 (2012), 한국재산법학회
- 김현수, "징벌적 손해배상제도에 관한 입법평가" (2012), 한국법제연구원
- 박동진, "징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성(Ι)" (2007), 한국법제연구원
- 박종렬, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (26), pp.137~165 (2007), 한국법학회
- 윤석찬, "독일법체계와 징벌적 손해배상", 한국법제연구원 입법평가 회의자료집 14, ~ (2012)
- 윤석찬, "2002년 獨逸의 개정된 損害賠償法과 精神的 損害에 대한 賠償-우리 민법과의 비교법적 관점에서", 재산법연구, 19(1), pp.105~124 (2002), 한국재산법학회
- 윤용석, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 미국의 최근 동향", 재산법연구, 23(1), pp.247~276 (2006), 한국재산법학회
- 윤정환, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 연구", 사회과학연구, (10) (2003), 창원대학교 사회과학연구소
- 이명갑, "제재적 위자료의 입론(Ⅲ)", 사법행정 (1987), 한국사법행정학회
- 이점인, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰", 동아법학, (38) (2006), 동아대학교 법학연구소
- 이지윤, "독일 민법상 위자료와 일반적 인격권 침해에 대한 금전배상의 기능상 차이점과 우리 민법에의 도입가능성 검토", 민사법학, 56, pp.163~224 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 장재옥, "위자료와 사적제재", 중앙법학, (창간) (1999), 중앙법학회
- 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상과 법치국가의 원리", 법학논문집, (9) (1995), 중앙대학교 법학연구소
- 장재옥, "미국의 거액 손해배상판결의 승인과 집행", 비교사법, (창간) (1994), 한국비교사법학회
- 사법개혁추진위원회 기획추진단, "징벌적 배상제도 참고자료", ~ (2006)
- 銀泉リスクソ=リューションズ株式会社, "米国における賠償責任の動向", Risk Solutions Report, 1 (2012)
- 伊藤博文, "慰謝料の性質をめぐる議論について", Bulletin of Toyohashi Sozo College, (7) (2003)
- Barbara J. Shander, "Punitive Damages-Addressing the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages in the Third Circuit", Vill. L. Rev (1994)
- "Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 282", ~ (1989)
- Esser, "Schuldrecht Bd. 2 Besondere Teil. Teilband 2. Gesetzliche Schuldverhältnisse" (2000)
- Eri Osaka, "Reevaluating the Role of the Tort Liability System in Japan", Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 26 (2009)
- Hans Stoll, "Penal Purposes in the Law of Tort", Am. J. Comp. L, 18, pp.3~ (1970)
- Jacqueline Perczek, "On Efficiency, Punishment, Deterrence and Fairness: A Survey of Punitive Damages Law and a Proposed Jury Instruction", Suffolk U. L. Rev, 27, pp.825~ (1993)
- Klaus Beucher, "United States Punitive Damage Awards in German Courts: The Evolving German Position on Service and Enforcement", Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 23 (1991)
- Nils Jansen, "Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives" (2009), Springer
- Pace, Kimberly A., "Recalibrating the Scales of Justice Through National Punitive Damages Reform", Am.U.L.Rev, 46 (1997)
- Richard L. Blatt, "Punitive Damages: A State-by-State Guide to Law and Practice" (1991)
- Simon Greenleaf, "A Treatise on the Law of Evidence § 253" (1972)
- Theodore Sedgwick, "A Treatise on the Measure of Damages", pp.38~39 (1972)
- Punitive Damage Awards in State Courts, 2005, "United States Department of Justice", ~, pp.NCJ 233094 (2011)
- Victor E. SchWartz, "Exporting United States Tort Law: The Importance of Authenticity, Necessity, and Learning from Our Mistakes", Pepp. L. Rev., 38 (2011)
- Volker Behr, "Punitive Damages in American and German Law-Tendencies Towards Approximation of Apparently Irreconcilable Concepts", Chi. Kent L. Rev., 78 (2003)