행정조달계약에 있어서 공익(公益)을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지에 관한 연구
A Study on Modification & Termination of the Contract for the Public Interest in Government Procurement Contracts
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is the basic principle of law that contracts must be followed. But it is necessary to accept the contract modification and the contract termination according to the public interest in the administrative procurement contract. Therefore, in the case of contract modification or termination according to the public interest in government procurement contracts, it is necessary to approach from the viewpoint of the rule of just compensation for the lawful taking of property by the power of eminent domain rather than contract theory in the judicial law. If there is a need for public interest in government procurement contracts, the government may unilaterally terminate the contract. In the United States, it permits the termination of convenience contracts if policies are changed, such as to prevent unnecessary spending or loss, or to withdraw projects for budget cuts. Therefore, it is reasonable to acknowledge the modification and termination of the contract for public interest in the case that the factual or legal status on which the contract originally originated is significantly changed or in the case of force majeure such as natural disasters occurs. Even if a contract modification or termination for public benefit is allowed, it should be considered contract modification first and used contract termination as a last resort. If the contract is terminated, just compensation should be given. Justcompensation should, in principle, fully compensate the objective value of the damaged property, but it may be less if reasonable. Therefore, in the case of contract termination for the public interest, it restricts the other party's recovery to costs incurred, profit on work done, and costs of preparing the termination settlement proposal. Recovery of anticipated profit is precluded. If the compensation of the expected profit is allowed, the termination of the contract for the public interest may become meaningless.
Abstract
It is the basic principle of law that contracts must be followed. But it is necessary to accept the contract modification and the contract termination according to the public interest in the administrative procurement contract. Therefore, in the case of contract modification or termination according to the public interest in government procurement contracts, it is necessary to approach from the viewpoint of the rule of just compensation for the lawful taking of property by the power of eminent domain rather than contract theory in the judicial law. If there is a need for public interest in government procurement contracts, the government may unilaterally terminate the contract. In the United States, it permits the termination of convenience contracts if policies are changed, such as to prevent unnecessary spending or loss, or to withdraw projects for budget cuts. Therefore, it is reasonable to acknowledge the modification and termination of the contract for public interest in the case that the factual or legal status on which the contract originally originated is significantly changed or in the case of force majeure such as natural disasters occurs. Even if a contract modification or termination for public benefit is allowed, it should be considered contract modification first and used contract termination as a last resort. If the contract is terminated, just compensation should be given. Justcompensation should, in principle, fully compensate the objective value of the damaged property, but it may be less if reasonable. Therefore, in the case of contract termination for the public interest, it restricts the other party's recovery to costs incurred, profit on work done, and costs of preparing the termination settlement proposal. Recovery of anticipated profit is precluded. If the compensation of the expected profit is allowed, the termination of the contract for the public interest may become meaningless.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강지웅, "독일법상 행정조달 낙찰자결정에 대한권리구제에 관한 연구 - 유럽법상 한계치 이상의 공공발주를 중심으로 -", 행정법연구, (23), pp.163~206 (2009), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 민간투자사업관리법제 개선방안에 관한 연구(Ⅲ)『사후관리방안』, "길준규", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 김광수, "사회기반시설을 위한 민간투자 제도의 법적 문제", 토지공법연구, 43(2), pp.167~182 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
- 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" (2008), 박영사
- 김남철, "행정법강론" (2014), 박영사
- -정부계약법과의 관계정립을 중심으로, "김대인", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 김봉채, "不動産(住宅)建設都給契約의 法的 性質에 關한 硏究- 公法上의 契約(行政契約的 性質) -", 부동산학보, (30), pp.46~75 (2007), 한국부동산학회
- 민간투자사업관리법제 개선방안에 관한 연구(Ⅱ)-공공성과 투명성 제고를 중심으로, "김성수", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 박균성, "행정법론(상)" (2014), 박영사
- 박정훈, "행정법의 체계와 방법론(행정법연구Ⅰ)" (2005), 박영사
- 윤성철, "민간투자법제 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보
- "이순우", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 이양규, "턴키대안 건설공사의 입찰 및 설계심의제도 개선방안", 대한토목학회 논문집D, 27(4D), pp.491~497 (2007), 대한토목학회
- 이영동, "공공계약을 둘러싼 몇 가지 문제: 공공계약의 공법적 특성을 중심으로", 사법논집, 44 (2007), 법원도서관
- 전현철, "행정조달계약에 있어서 법적 구제수단에 관한 고찰 - 입찰단계에서의 분쟁을 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 14(1), pp.405~435 (2013), 한국비교공법학회
- 전현철, "미국 연방(聯邦)정부 조달계약에 관한 법적 고찰", 미국헌법연구, 23(1), pp.261~296 (2012), 미국헌법학회
- 전현철, "정부조달계약에 있어서 행정적 분쟁해결절차의 활성화를 위한 연구", 법학논총, 32(4), pp.101~132 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정남철, "民官協力(PPP)에 의한 公的課題遂行의 法的 爭點 ― 獨逸 및 유럽연합(EU)에서의 論議를 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 37(2), pp.341~364 (2008), 한국공법학회
- 민간투자사업에 있어 국가계약법의 적용에 관한 연구, "홍성필", KDI 공공투자관리센터, ~ (2008)
- 홍정선, "행정법특강" (2014), 박영사
- Termination for convenience—costs recoverable, "Chassman, Mark B.", Construction Lawyer, ~ (1987)
- “Cardinal Change” Doctrine in Federal Contracts Law, American Law Reports, "Hess, J.D.", ~ (2006)
- Kelleher Jr., Thomas J., "Federal Government Construction Contracts" (2010), John Wiley & Son, Inc
- Korman, Phillip T., "Balancing the scales: applying the fair compensation principle to determine recovery for commercial item contracts terminated for the government's convenience", Military Law Review, (Summer) (2014)
- Margaret M., "Contracting with the Federal Government" (1998), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- Nash, Ralph C., "The Government Contract Decisions of The Federal Circuit", George Washington Law Review (2010)
- Page, Jr, Bruce D., "When reliance is detrimental: economic, moral, and policy arguments for expectation damages in contracts terminated for the convenience of the government", Air Force Law Review (2008)
- Pederson, Marc A., "Rethinking the termination for convenience clause in federal contracts", Public Contract Law Journal, (Fall) (2001)
- Roin, Julie A., "Public-private partnerships and termination for convenience clauses: time for a mandate", Emory Law Journal (2013)
- Beyond changes: abandonment and cardinal change, "Silberman, Aaron P.", Construction Lawyer, ~ (2002)
- Willmeth, Roger E., "Determining whether modifications are within the scope of the contract", Air Force Law Review (1988)
- Ronellenfitsch 34. Edition, "Bader", Beck'scher Online-Kommentar VwVfG
- FrankRoth, Köln, "Die Risikoverteilung bei Öffentlich Privaten Partnerschaften (ÖPP) aus vergaberechtlicher Sicht", NZBau (2006)
- Hermann Müller, "Öffentlich-rechtliche Dienstleistungskonzessionen künftig ein Beschaffungsvorgang?", NVwZ (2016)
- Stelkens, "Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz" (2014)