러시아어 통증 동사의 의미장과 리브랜딩 메커니즘
Semantic Field of Pain Verbs in Russian and Their Rebranding Mechanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 러시아어 통증 동사의 의미장과 이차적 통증 동사들이 지닌 리브랜딩(rebranding) 메커니즘을 분석한다. 기본 통증 동사인 болеть 외에도, 연소, 파괴/변형, 소리, 운동 등의 의미장에서전이된 이차적 통증 동사들은 의미적 변형과 통사적 재구조화를 통해 통증 의미장을 형성한다. 기존의 은유, 환유적 해석만으로는 이러한 변화를 충분히 설명할 수 없으며, 본 연구는 근원 동사의 능동적 의미가 결과적 상태로 전환되는 과정에서 발생하는 리브랜딩 메커니즘을 제안한다. 분석 결과, 러시아어 이차 통증 동사는 지속적 상태를 강조하는 경향이 있으며, 이는 형태⋅통사적 자질의 변화와 관련이 있다. 본 연구는 러시아어 통증 동사의 의미 변화를 이해하는 데 기여하며, 언어적 구조와통증 표현의 상관성에 대한 새로운 시각을 제시한다.
Abstract
Ontologically, pain refers to the sensory and emotional unpleasant experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage (Melzack, 1975). While pain is universally experienced, direct access to another individual’s pain is not possible. The only way to share the experience of pain, which is inherently personal and subjective, is through its expression in language. However, pain is not limited solely to the intensity of a specific sensation but encompasses a wide range of qualities beneath a single lexical level. Pain verbs generally encompass fewer than five core verbs. In English, “pain,” “ache,” and “hurt” are used; in German, “schmerzen” and “weh tun”; and in Russian, the verb “бол еть” is prominent. Beyond these basic pain verbs, there are secondary pain verbs borrowed from other semantic fields. These secondary pain verbs cannot be fully explained through traditional metaphoric or metonymic interpretations. When an active action is applied to the body, pain emerges as a potential outcome in secondary pain verbs. This transformation involves shifts in meaning, accompanied by morphological and syntactic changes, which ultimately reshape the verb into a cognitive concept of pain. This study defines the rebranding process of the base verb and examines the structural characteristics of these secondary pain verbs. It explores their lexical evolution from both synchronic and diachronic perspectives. The study argues that secondary pain verbs are not just simple shifts in meaning but rather a rebranding process that fundamentally alters how speakers perceive and interpret these verbs, offering new insights into the mechanisms of linguistic and cognitive change.