본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Meaning in Discourse; A Relevance – Theoretical Approach to EkeGusii Polysemes.

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study is motivated by assertions made by Bréal (1924 [1897]) claiming that deciphering of polysemes at a synchronic level should not posit a problem because meanings of such polysemes are mainly determined by the context of the discourse: It is the context that eliminates ambiguity and foregrounds the meaning of a particular polyseme. The study is based on the tenets of relevance theory, particularly the cognitive and communicative principles, (Sperber and Wilson, 1986/1995; and Carston, 2002) to render a pragmatic account of EkeGusii polysemes. It strives to investigate how polysemous senses of EkeGusii lexical items are established and meaning deciphered. This study deduces that the meaning of a polysemous word is inferred pragmatically as a result of the addressee endeavouring to deduce what a speaker intends by the particular lexical concepts they encode; hence it is a communicative phenomenon that is highly dependent on the addressee’s ability to employ pragmatic inference.

Abstract

This study is motivated by assertions made by Bréal (1924 [1897]) claiming that deciphering of polysemes at a synchronic level should not posit a problem because meanings of such polysemes are mainly determined by the context of the discourse: It is the context that eliminates ambiguity and foregrounds the meaning of a particular polyseme. The study is based on the tenets of relevance theory, particularly the cognitive and communicative principles, (Sperber and Wilson, 1986/1995; and Carston, 2002) to render a pragmatic account of EkeGusii polysemes. It strives to investigate how polysemous senses of EkeGusii lexical items are established and meaning deciphered. This study deduces that the meaning of a polysemous word is inferred pragmatically as a result of the addressee endeavouring to deduce what a speaker intends by the particular lexical concepts they encode; hence it is a communicative phenomenon that is highly dependent on the addressee’s ability to employ pragmatic inference.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. Allott, N., "The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics" (2014)
  2. Allwood, J., "Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Lexical Semantics", pp.29~66 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  3. Valentina Bambini, "Differentiating among pragmatic uses of words through timed sensicality judgments", Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (2013), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
  4. Barsalou, L. W., "Ad hoc categories", Memory & Cognition, 11, pp.211~227 (1983)
  5. Barsalou, L. W., "Concepts and Conceptual Development", pp.101~140 (1987), Cambridge University Press
  6. Blakemore, D., "Semantic Constraints on Relevance" (1987), Blackwell
  7. Blakemore, D., "Understanding Utterances" (1992), Blackwell
  8. Blakemore, D., "Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  9. Blutner, R., "Lexical pragmatics", Journal of Semantics, 15(2), pp.115~162 (1998)
  10. Blutner, R., "Semantics", pp.27~58 (2002), Helmut Buske Verlag
  11. Blutner, R., "Handbook of pragmatics", pp.488~514 (2004), Blackwell
  12. Bosire, B. M., "Ekegusii, a Comparative Study of Rogoro and Maate Dialects", M.A., pp.1993
  13. Bréal, M., "Essai de sémantique: Science des significations" (1924), Gérard Monfort
  14. Burton -roberts Noel, "Pragmatics" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  15. Campbell, L., "Historical Linguistics. An Introduction" (1998), Edinburgh University Press
  16. Carston, R., "Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?", Linguistische Berichte, 8, pp.103~127 (1997)
  17. Explicature and semantics, "Carston, R.", UCL, 1~44, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12 (2000)
  18. Carston, R., "Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication" (2002), Blackwell
  19. Carston, R., "Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110 (2010)
  20. Carston, R., "Metaphor, hyperbole and simile : A pragmatic approach", Language and Cognition, 3, pp.283~312 (2011)
  21. Copestake, A., "Lexical Semantics. TheProblem of Polysemy", pp.15~67 (1996), Clarendon Press
  22. Crowley, T., "An introduction to historical linguistics" (1997), Oxford University Press
  23. Cuyckens, H., "Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics" (2001), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  24. Evans, V., "The meaning of time : polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure", Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), pp.33~75 (2005)
  25. Evans, V., "How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction" (2009), Oxford University Press
  26. Bergljot Behrens, "A relevance-theoretic analysis of concept narrowing and broadening in English and Norwegian original texts and translations", Languages in Contrast, 7(2), pp.119~141 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company[DOI]
  27. Falkum, I. L., "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A Relevance- Theoretic Account", PhD, pp.2011
  28. Fodor, J. A., "Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science", pp.257~316 (1981), The MIT Press
  29. Fodor, J. A., "Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong" (1998), Clarendon Press
  30. Gibbs, R. W., "Categorization and metaphor understanding", Psychological Review, 99(3), pp.572~577 (1992)
  31. Gibbs, R. W., "The Poetics of Mind" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  32. Glucksberg, S., "Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms" (2001), Oxford University Press
  33. Glucksberg, S., "Understanding metaphors", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, pp.39~43 (1998)
  34. Glucksberg, S., "Property attribution in metaphor comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 36, pp.50~67 (1997)
  35. Glucksberg, S., "Understanding metaphorical comparisons : Beyond similarity", Psychological Review, 97, pp.3~18 (1990)
  36. Grice, H. P., "Studies in the Way of Words", pp.213~223 (1989), Harvard University Press
  37. Grice, H. P., "Studies in the Way of Words", pp.1~143 (1989), Harvard UniversityPress
  38. Guthrie, M., "Comparative Bantu: An introduction to the comparative linguistics prehistory of the Bantu languages. Vol 2" (1971), Gregg Press
  39. Jackson, H., "Words, Meaning and Vocabulary" (2000), Continuum
  40. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, "2009 Kenya population and housing census: population distribution by age, sex, and administrative units. Volume 1c" (2010), Government Press
  41. Kihara, P. C., "A Relevance-Theoretical Analysis of Aspects of Mchongoano", The University of Nairobi Journal of language and Linguistics, 2, pp.63~78 (2012)
  42. Kittay, E. F., "Metaphor. Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure" (1987), Clarendon Press
  43. Krifka, M., "Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation" (2007), Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschapen
  44. Kripke, S. A., "Reference and Existence" (2013), Oxford University Press
  45. Lascarides, A., "Pragmatics and word meaning", Journal of Linguistics, 34, pp.387~414 (1998)
  46. Lasersohn, P., "Pragmatic halos", Language, 75(3), pp.522~551 (1999)
  47. Lewis, D., "Philosophical Papers, volume 1", pp.233~249 (1979), Oxford University Press
  48. Magachi, L.N, "A Pragmatic Analysis of EkeGusii Riddles", pp.2015
  49. Mecha, G. E., "The phonology and morphology of Ekegusii reduplication: an optimality theoretic approach", MA, pp.2004
  50. Mose, G. E., "The structure and role of the determiner phrase in Ekegusii: a minimalist approach", MA, pp.2012
  51. Murphy, G. L., "Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes", pp.235~265 (1997), American Psychological Association
  52. Murphy, G. L., "The Big Book of Concepts" (2002), MIT Press
  53. PusteJovsky, J., "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
  54. Pustejovsky, J., "Lexical Semantics. The Problem of Polysemy" (1996), Clarendon Press
  55. Recanati, F., "Foundations of Speech Act Theory", pp.156~166 (1994), Routledge
  56. Recanati, F., "The alleged priority of literal interpretation", Cognitive Science, 19, pp.207~232 (1995)
  57. Maxilom, R. M. R., "Semantic changes of selected Cebuano words" (2008), San Carlos University Press
  58. Searle, J., "Intentionality" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  59. Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
  60. Sperber, D., "The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon", pp.184~200 (1998)
  61. Sweetser, E., "From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  62. Taylor, J. R., "Cognitive Linguistics. Current App lications and Future Perspectives", pp.51~80 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
  63. Travis, C., "On what is strictly speaking true", Canadian Journal of Philosophy Edmonton, 15(2), pp.187~229 (1985)
  64. Tyler, A., "Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks : The case of over", Language, 77(4), pp.724~765 (2001)
  65. Tyler, A., "The Semantics of English Prepositions" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  66. Vega-Moreno, R., "Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech" (2007), John Benjamins
  67. Wilson, D., "Relevance and lexical pragmatics", Italian Journal of Linguistics, 2003, pp.15, 273~291
  68. Wilson, D., "Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue", Mind & Language, 21(3), pp.404~433 (2006)
  69. Wilson, D., "Pragmatics", pp.230~260 (2007), Palgrave
  70. Zlatev, J., "Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics", pp.447~494 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)