발화 의미와 외축(Explicature)
Utterance Meaning and Explicature
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We use pragmatic inference even when figuring out what the speaker is explicitly saying as well as guessing what is implicated behind the literal meaning. In the framework of the relevance theory, explicature, which is a hybrid of linguistic meaning and pragmatic inference, plays an important role in the utterance comprehension process. This study aims to stipulate what kind of pragmatic processes affect the derivation of explicatures. In previous research, Carston states following four pragmatic processes contribute to recovering explicatures; disambiguation, saturation, free enrichment, and ad-hoc concept construction. However, there are no reasons to separate the four processes into partially pragmatic processes such as saturation and disambiguation or fully pragmatic processes like free enrichment and ad-hoc concept construction. This is because explicatature derivation processes are all guided by pragmatic principles. Therefore, the authors suggest that pragmatic processes which are involved in deriving explicatures can be summed up into pragmatic meaning selection process and pragmatic enrichment process.
Abstract
We use pragmatic inference even when figuring out what the speaker is explicitly saying as well as guessing what is implicated behind the literal meaning. In the framework of the relevance theory, explicature, which is a hybrid of linguistic meaning and pragmatic inference, plays an important role in the utterance comprehension process. This study aims to stipulate what kind of pragmatic processes affect the derivation of explicatures. In previous research, Carston states following four pragmatic processes contribute to recovering explicatures; disambiguation, saturation, free enrichment, and ad-hoc concept construction. However, there are no reasons to separate the four processes into partially pragmatic processes such as saturation and disambiguation or fully pragmatic processes like free enrichment and ad-hoc concept construction. This is because explicatature derivation processes are all guided by pragmatic principles. Therefore, the authors suggest that pragmatic processes which are involved in deriving explicatures can be summed up into pragmatic meaning selection process and pragmatic enrichment process.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강미경, "관련성 원리에 입각한 대화함축과 맥락함축", 언어연구, 16, pp.5~22 (2000)
- 국지연, "'말해진 것'의 명시의미: 적합성이론 분석", 담화와 인지, 14(2), pp.1~25 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회
- 서영환, "영어의 습관적 현재: 적합성 이론 분석", 언어연구, 30(2), pp.375~394 (2014), 한국현대언어학회
- Bach, K., "Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspective", pp.267~291 (1994), Routledge
- Borg, E., "The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy" (2013), Broadview Press
- Borg, E., "Exploding Explicatures", Mind and Language (2015)
- Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, "The Semantics", pp.1999, Carston, R.
- Carston, R., "Semantics: A Reader" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Carston, R., "Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics", Mind & Language, 17(1-2), pp.127~148 (2002)
- Carston, R., "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.633~656 (2004), Blackwell
- Carston, R., "Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics", pp.217~287 (2010), Palgrae
- Carston, R., "Word Meaning, What is Said and Explicature", ~ (2013)
- Clark, B., "Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Grice, H. P., "Logic and Conversation", H. P. Grice 1989, 3~143 (1989)
- Jaszczolt, K. M., "Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages" (2014), Mouton de Gruyter
- Kaplan, D., "Themes from Kaplan", pp.481~463 (1989), Oxford University Press
- Recanati, F., "On Defining Communicative Intentions", Mind & Language, pp.213~242 (1986)
- Recanati, F., "The pragmatics of what is said", Mind & Language, 4, pp.295~329 (1989)
- Recanati, F., "Literal Meaning" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Sperber, D, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Blackwell, Oxford and Harvard University Press
- Sperber, D, "Relevance. Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
- Sperber, D, "Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy", pp.468~501 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Travis, C., "Pragmatics", In Hale, B. and Wright, C, 87~107 (1997)
- Wilson, D., "Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics", Italian Journal of Linguistics, 2003, pp.15, 273~291
- Wilson, D, "Pragmatics", pp.230~259 (2007), Palgrave
- Wilson, D., "Conversation and Discourse", pp.155~178 (1981), Croom Helm
- Wilson, D., "Relevance Theory", Horn and Ward 2004, 607~632 (2004)