Comprehension of communicative intentions: The case of figurative language
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is concerned with children’s comprehension of the communicative meaning of conventional figurative communication acts. We assume that comprehending the communicative meaning of both figurative and non-figurative communication acts involves the same cognitive processes. We hypothesize that the complexity of the mental representations involved accounts for the increasing difficulty in comprehending the very same conventional figurative expression, uttered with a sincere, deceitful or ironic intent. A pre-test on 20 children (7 to 7; 6 year-olds) ascertained the conventionality of the 6 figurative expressions used as the experimental material, e.g. To be as mute as a fish. For each figurative expression we created three different communicative contexts, within which that expression acquired either a sincere, deceitful or ironic communicative meaning. In the experiment, we presented 108 children aged 7 to 10; 6 years with brief audio-recorded stories, each involving a figurative expression in a specific communicative context. The children’s performance reflects the predicted trend in difficulty for comprehending the use of the very same figurative expression, from the easiest to the most difficult: sincere, deceitful, ironic. Our results are in favor of a unifying framework for explaining the comprehension of figurative and non-figurative communication acts.
Abstract
This study is concerned with children’s comprehension of the communicative meaning of conventional figurative communication acts. We assume that comprehending the communicative meaning of both figurative and non-figurative communication acts involves the same cognitive processes. We hypothesize that the complexity of the mental representations involved accounts for the increasing difficulty in comprehending the very same conventional figurative expression, uttered with a sincere, deceitful or ironic intent. A pre-test on 20 children (7 to 7; 6 year-olds) ascertained the conventionality of the 6 figurative expressions used as the experimental material, e.g. To be as mute as a fish. For each figurative expression we created three different communicative contexts, within which that expression acquired either a sincere, deceitful or ironic communicative meaning. In the experiment, we presented 108 children aged 7 to 10; 6 years with brief audio-recorded stories, each involving a figurative expression in a specific communicative context. The children’s performance reflects the predicted trend in difficulty for comprehending the use of the very same figurative expression, from the easiest to the most difficult: sincere, deceitful, ironic. Our results are in favor of a unifying framework for explaining the comprehension of figurative and non-figurative communication acts.
참고문헌 (64)
- Ackerman,Phillip L., "Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants", Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp.598~614 (1992)
- Airenti, Gabriella, "Planning and understanding speech acts by interpersonal games", Computational models of natural language processing, pp.9~31 (1984), Amsterdam: North-Holland
- Airenti, Gabriella, "Conversation and behaviour games in pragmatics of dialogue", Cognitive Science, 17, pp.197~256 (1993)
- Airenti, Gabriella, "Failures, exploitations and deceits in communication", Journal of Pragmatics, 20, pp.303~326 (1993)
- Allbritton, David, "Metaphor-based schemas and text comprehension: Making connections through conceptual metaphor", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, pp.612~625 (1995)
- Andrews, Janet, "Children’s abilities to distinguish metaphoric and ironic utterances from mistakes and lies", Communication and cognition, 19, pp.281~298 (1986)
- Bara, Bruno G, "Development of syllogistic reasoning", American Journal of Psychology, 2, pp.157~193 (1995)
- Bara,Bruno G., "Cognitive Science: A developmental approach to the simulation of the mind" (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Bara,Bruno G, "Cognitive Pragmatics" (2009), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Bara, Bruno G, "Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children", Brain & Language, 68, pp.57~528 (1999)
- Bara, Bruno G, "Communicative abilities in autism: Evidence for attentional deficits", Brain and Language, 77, pp.216~240 (2001)
- Bara, Bruno, G, "Mental model theory of deduction: A unified computational approach", Cognitive Science, 25, pp.839~901 (2001)
- Blasko, Dawn G, "Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(2), pp.295~308 (1993)
- Bosco,Francesca M, "Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.546~552 (2006)
- Bosco, Francesca M, "Simple and Complex Deceits and Ironies", Journal of Pragmtics, 40, pp.583~607 (2008)
- Bosco, Francesca M, "Literal meaning and context categories in the attribution of communicative intentions: A developmental study", Proceedings of the XXV Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science, pp.162~167 (2003), Massachusetts: Cognitive Science Society
- Bosco, Francesca M, "The fundamental context categories in understanding communicative intentions", Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.467~488 (2004)
- Bosco, Francesca M, "Recognition and repair of communicative failures: A developmental perspective", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.1398~1429 (2006)
- Bucciarelli, Monica, "How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures", Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp.207~241 (2003)
- Capelli, Carol A, "How children understand sarcasm: the role of context and intonation", Child Developmental, 61, pp.1824~1841 (1990)
- Chiappe Dan, "Reversibility, Aptness, and the Conventionality of Metaphors and Similes", Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), pp.85~105 (2003)
- Colston, Herbert L, "Are irony and metaphor understood differently?", Metaphor and Symbol, 17, pp.57~80 (2002)
- De Marco, "Linguistic and extralinguistic communication in deaf children", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.134~158 (2007)
- Dews, Shelly, "Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony", Child Development, 67, pp.3701~3085 (1996)
- Dick, Frederic, "The development of complex sentence interpretation in typically developing children compared with children with specific language impairments or early unilateral focal lesion", Developmental Science, 7(3), pp.360~377 (2004)
- Gibbs,Raymond W., "Process and production in making sense of tropes", pp.252~278 (1993), New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Gibbs,Raymond W., "The poetics of mind: Figurative though language and understanding" (1994), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Gibbs,Raymond W., "Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding", Metaphor and Symbol, 16, pp.317~333 (2001)
- Glucksberger, Sam, "How metaphor work. Metaphor and thought", pp.401~424 (1993), New York: Cambridge University Press
- Grice, Paul H, "Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions, Philosophical Review 78", MA: Harvard University Press, 147~177 (1969)
- Grice,Paul H., "Logic and conversation", Speech acts: syntax and semantics, 3, pp.41~58 (1975), New York: Academic Press.
- Grice,Paul H., "Studies in the way of words" (1989), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Harris, Richard J, "Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context", Journal of pragmatics, 38(6), pp.863~879 (2006)
- Johnson Andrew T., "Comprehension of metaphors and Similes: A Reaction Time Study", Metaphor and Symbol, 112, pp.145~159 (1996)
- Johnson,Janice, "Developmental versus language-based factors in metaphor interpretation", Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), pp.470~483 (1991)
- Kaplan, John, "Children’s ability to discriminate and understand irony and metaphor", pp.425~443 (1993), New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Karmiloff-Smith,Annette, "Beyond Modularity" (1992), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Katz, Albert. N, "Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker Occupation can Change metaphor to irony", Metaphor and Symbol, 12, pp.19~41 (1997)
- Keil,Frank C., "Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor", Cognitive Development, 1, pp.73~96 (1986)
- Laval, Virginie, "French-speaking children’s understanding of sarcasm. The role of intonation and context", Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 68, pp.610~620 (2005)
- Levorato, Maria C, "How children understand idioms in discourse", Journal of Child Language, 16, pp.387~405 (1989)
- Levorato, Maria C, "Children comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity", Journal of Child Language, 19, pp.415~433 (1992)
- Levorato, Maria C, "The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, pp.261~283 (1995)
- Lewis, David, "Languages and language", pp.3~3 (1975), MN: University of Minneapolis Press
- Lewis,David, "Scorekeeping in a language game", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, pp.339~359 (1979)
- Lucariello, Joan, "The development of complex metarepresentational reasoning: The case of situational irony", Cognitive Development, 10, pp.551~576 (1995)
- Nippold, Marilyn A, "Familiarity and transparency in idiom explanation: A developmental study of children and adolescents", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, pp.728~737 (1993)
- Nippold, Marilyn A, "Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents", Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45, pp.384~391 (2002)
- Nippold, Marilyn A, "Conversational Versus Expository Discourse: A study of Syntactic Development in Children, Adolescents, and Adults", Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, pp.1048~1064 (2005)
- Nippold, Marilyn A, "Idiom understanding in youth: Further examination of familiarity and transparency", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, pp.426~433 (1995)
- Ortony, Andrew, "Interpreting metaphors and idioms. Some effects of context on comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, pp.465~477 (1978)
- Perner, Josef, "John thinks, that Mary thinks that..", Journal of Child Experimental Psychology, 39, pp.437~471 (1985)
- Recanati,François, "alleged priority of literal interpretation", Cognitive Science, 19, pp.27~232 (1995)
- Reiter,Raymond, "A Logic for Default Reasoning", Artificial Intelligence, 131(2), pp.81~132 (1980)
- Searle,John R., "Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts" (1979), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Schank, Roger C, "Script, plans, goals, and understanding" (1977), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Sperber,Dan, "Understanding verbal understanding", pp.179~198 (1996), New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
- Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and cognition" (1986), Oxford: Blackwell, UK
- Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition.
- Sullivan, Kate, "How children tell a lie from a joke: role of second-order mental state attributions", British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, pp.191~204 (1995)
- Wilson, Deidre, "Metaphor, Relevance and the “Emergent Property”", Mind and Language, 21, pp.404~433 (2006)
- Winner, Ellen, "Metaphor and irony: Two levels of understanding", pp.425~443 (1993), New York: Cambridge University Press
- Winner, Ellen, "Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention", British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, pp.257~270 (1991)
- Winner,Ellen, "The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony" (1988), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press