본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Young EFL students’ reliance on path-breaking verbs in the use of English argument structure constructions

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigates the extent to which young EFL students rely on path- breaking verbs in the comprehension and production of English argument structure constructions. In a sentence-sorting task, Korean EFL learners in grades 7 and 10 sorted English sentences, which were created by crossing four verbs with four constructions, into same groups according to overall sentence meaning and form. The results showed dominant verb-oriented sorting in grade 7, and more construction-biased sorting in grade 10 when the sentence included a path-breaking verb. In a written production task, Korean EFL students from grades 4 to 7 wrote a book report in English after a 4-week extensive reading program. The results demonstrated the more dominant use of path-breaking verbs in the ditransitive and resultative constructions than in the caused-motion construction. We discuss these findings in terms of usage-based perspectives of constructional learning.

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which young EFL students rely on path- breaking verbs in the comprehension and production of English argument structure constructions. In a sentence-sorting task, Korean EFL learners in grades 7 and 10 sorted English sentences, which were created by crossing four verbs with four constructions, into same groups according to overall sentence meaning and form. The results showed dominant verb-oriented sorting in grade 7, and more construction-biased sorting in grade 10 when the sentence included a path-breaking verb. In a written production task, Korean EFL students from grades 4 to 7 wrote a book report in English after a 4-week extensive reading program. The results demonstrated the more dominant use of path-breaking verbs in the ditransitive and resultative constructions than in the caused-motion construction. We discuss these findings in terms of usage-based perspectives of constructional learning.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Abbot-Smith, K., "Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition", The Linguistic Review, 233, pp.275~290 (2006)
  2. Akhtar, N, "Acquiring basic word order : evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure", Journal of Child Language, 26, pp.339~356 (1999)
  3. Akhtar, N., "Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology", Developmental Psychology, 33, pp.952~965 (1997)
  4. Barlow, M., "Usage based models of language" (2000), CSLI
  5. Bates, E., "Mechanisms of language acquisition", pp.157~193 (1987), Erlbaum
  6. Bencini, G. M. L., "The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning", Journal of Memory and Language, 43, pp.640~651 (2000)
  7. Bybee, J., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition", pp.216~236 (2008), Routledge
  8. Cameron-Faulkner, T., "A construction based analysis of child directed speech", Cognitive Science, 27, pp.843~873 (2003)
  9. Campbell, A. L., "The acquisition of English dative constructions", Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, pp.253~267 (2001)
  10. Casenhiser, D., "Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning", Developmental Science, 8, pp.500~508 (2005)
  11. Claridge, G, "Graded readers: How the publishers make the grade", Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), pp.106~119 (2012)
  12. Croft, W, "Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
  13. Day, R. R, "Extensive reading in the second language classroom" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  14. Day, R. R., "Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading", Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, pp.136~141 (2002)
  15. Dodson, K., "Acquiring the transitive construction in English : The role of animacy and pronouns", Journal of Child Language, 25, pp.555~574 (1998)
  16. Ellis, N. C, "Frequency effects in language processing : A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, pp.143~188 (2002)
  17. Ellis, N. C., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition", pp.372~405 (2008), Routledge
  18. Ellis, N. C, "The Oxford handbook of construction grammar", pp.365~378 (2013), Oxford University Press
  19. Ellis, N. C., "Constructions and their acquisition : Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy", Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, pp.188~221 (2009)
  20. Ellis, N. C., "Constructing a second language : Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage", Language Learning, 59, pp.90~125 (2009)
  21. Farrar, J, "Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition", Developmental Psychology, 28, pp.90~98 (1992)
  22. Goldberg A, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  23. Goldberg, A, "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  24. Goldberg, A., "Learning argument structure generalizations", Cognitive Linguistics, 15, pp.289~316 (2004)
  25. Goldberg, A. E, "The Oxford handbook of construction grammar", pp.15~31 (2013), Oxford University Press
  26. Gries, S. T., "Do foreign language learners also have constructions?", Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.182~200 (2005)
  27. Gropen, J., "The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English", Language, 652, pp.203~257 (1989)
  28. Joe, A, "What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition?", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.357~377 (1998)
  29. Keijzer, M, "Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada", 박사, pp.2007
  30. Langacker, R, "Usage-based models of language", pp.1~60 (2000), CSLI
  31. 이진화, "Korean College Students' Knowledge on English Argument Structure Constructions Depending on English Proficiency", 영어학, 16(2), pp.121~142 (2016), 한국영어학회
  32. MacWhinney, B, "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition" (2008), Routledge
  33. Manzanares, J. V., "Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar", pp.198~230 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  34. Ministry of Education, "The English National Curriculum" (2015), Ministry of Education
  35. Ninio, A, "Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity", Journal of Child Language, 26, pp.619~653 (1999)
  36. Pinker, S, "Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of verb–argument structure" (1989), Harvard University Press
  37. Snyder, W, "On the nature of syntactic variation : Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation", Language, 77, pp.324~342 (2001)
  38. Stromswold, K., "The acquisition of datives, particles, and related constructions: Evidence for delayed parametric learning", Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.621~628 (1995), Cascadilla Press
  39. Sung, Min-Chang, "Applied construction grammar", pp.89~114 (2016), Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
  40. Theakston, A., "The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure", Journal of Child Language, 28, pp.127~152 (2001)
  41. Tomasello, M, "First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  42. Tomasello, M, "Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition" (2003), Harvard University Press
  43. Tomasello, M., "The development of language", pp.161~190 (1999), Psychology Press
  44. Valenzuela, J., "Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar", pp.198~230 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  45. 양현권, "외국어교육의 구조적 기반으로서의 목표어의 언어 체계", 국어교육, (133), pp.63~81 (2010), 한국어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)