본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean EFL Learners’ Processing of English Caused-Motion Construction

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study explores how Korean English learners process English caused-motion constructions (CMC) through online and offline experiments. The focus was on how Korean learners’ processing of English CMC is affected by the typological difference between English and Korean. Of the 77 volunteer participants recruited, 17 were native English speakers and 60 were Korean EFL learners. The experiments included a sentence completion task (SCT) as an online experiment, and an acceptability jugment task (AJT) and a translation (correction) task as offline experiments. The results showed that in the SCT, the Korean learners showed difficulty in combining process and result events with intransitive manner verbs. In the AJT, they rarely accepted the CMCs with intransitive manner verbs, but easily accepted the ‘causative verb + by- phrase’ structures with the same type of verbs. When the sentences were employed in the AJT were asked to be translated into Korean, the low-intermediate Korean learners were likely to drop the result meaning and interpret the preposition phrase as a locative rather than a goal. In sum, Korean learners showed similar patterns to native English speakers in processing path verbs and transitive manner verbs, but different pattern in processing intransitive manner verbs. These findings demonstrate that Korean learners' processing of English CMC is heavily influenced by their L1 when the construction accompanied intransitive manner verbs.

Abstract

This study explores how Korean English learners process English caused-motion constructions (CMC) through online and offline experiments. The focus was on how Korean learners’ processing of English CMC is affected by the typological difference between English and Korean. Of the 77 volunteer participants recruited, 17 were native English speakers and 60 were Korean EFL learners. The experiments included a sentence completion task (SCT) as an online experiment, and an acceptability jugment task (AJT) and a translation (correction) task as offline experiments. The results showed that in the SCT, the Korean learners showed difficulty in combining process and result events with intransitive manner verbs. In the AJT, they rarely accepted the CMCs with intransitive manner verbs, but easily accepted the ‘causative verb + by- phrase’ structures with the same type of verbs. When the sentences were employed in the AJT were asked to be translated into Korean, the low-intermediate Korean learners were likely to drop the result meaning and interpret the preposition phrase as a locative rather than a goal. In sum, Korean learners showed similar patterns to native English speakers in processing path verbs and transitive manner verbs, but different pattern in processing intransitive manner verbs. These findings demonstrate that Korean learners' processing of English CMC is heavily influenced by their L1 when the construction accompanied intransitive manner verbs.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Aske, J., "Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look", Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.1~14 (1989), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  2. Beavers, J., "The typology of motion expressions revisited", Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), pp.331~377 (2010)
  3. Choi, J-Y., "Communicative functions and argument structure constructions in Korean middle school students’ English speaking interaction", master’s, pp.2015
  4. 최원희, "한국인 영어 학습자의 이동사건 표현 양상 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2010
  5. Comrie, B., "Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Vol. 2)" (1976), Cambridge University Press
  6. Dowty, D. R., "Word meaning and montague grammar : The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTO" (1979), Reidel
  7. Folli, R., "On the licensing of causatives of directed motion : Waltzing Matilda all over", Studia Linguistica, 60(2), pp.121~155 (2006)
  8. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions : A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  9. Hoekstra, T., "Thematic structure: Its role in grammar", pp.145~174 (1992), Foris
  10. Hoekstra, T., "Unergatives as copular verbs; locational and existential predication", The Linguistic Review, 7(1), pp.1~80 (1990)
  11. Hoshino, N., "Processing subject–verb agreement in a second language depends on proficiency", Bilingualism : Language and Cognition, 13(2), pp.87~98 (2010)
  12. Howell, D. C., "Statistical methods for psychology" (2002), Duxbury
  13. 임성츨, "Fulfillment of Events Expressing Realization in English and Korean", 언어과학연구, 26, pp.307~326 (2003), 언어과학회
  14. Inagaki, S., "Motion verbs with goal PPs in L2 acquisition of English and Japanese", Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 23, pp.153~170 (2001)
  15. Jackendoff, R., "Semantics and cognition" (1983), MIT Press
  16. 정경혜, "영어와 한국어 이동사건의 어휘와 유형에 따른 학습자 오류 분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2005
  17. Kang, S-Y., "Serial verb constructions in Korean and their implications", Studies in Generative Grammar, 3(1), pp.79~109 (1993)
  18. Kim, S-H., "Effects of input frequency distribution manipulation on Korean students’ English argument structure construction learning and passage-level reading comprehension", master’s, pp.2017
  19. Kim, S-J., "L1 influence on L2 learning of English resultative constructions: The syntactic and semantic structure of Korean students’ interlanguage", doctoral, pp.2016
  20. Kim, H-W., "Developmental patterns of Korean EFL learners’ English argument structure constructions", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, pp.397~404 (2013)
  21. Ko, H., "Decomposing complex serialization : The role of v", Korean Linguistics, 17(1), pp.78~125 (2015)
  22. Kudrnáčová, N., "Directed motion at the syntax-semantics interface" (2008), Masaryk University
  23. Lee, J-E., "Study on Korean learners’ acquisition of English motion verbs", master’s, pp.2007
  24. Lee, S-H., "The syntax and semantics of serial verb constructions", doctoral, pp.1992
  25. Lee, Y-J., "Explorations in Korean language and linguistics", pp.443~458 (2003), Hankookmunhwasa
  26. 이진화, "The L2 Developmental Sequence of English Constructions and Underlying Factors", 영어학, 11(3), pp.577~600 (2011), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  27. Levin, B., "English verb classes and alternations : A preliminary investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  28. Levin, B., "The perspective from unaccusativity", Thematic structure : Its role in grammar, 16, pp.247~270 (1992)
  29. Levin, B., "Oxford handbook of event structure", pp.395~425 (2016), Oxford University Press
  30. Li, Y., "Structural head and aspectuality", Language, 69, pp.480~504 (1993)
  31. Lim, J. R., "Aspects of the lexicalization of motion events in Korean", Studies in Modern Grammar, 20(1), pp.23~45 (2000)
  32. Nam, S-H., "Lexical semantic structures and argument alternations of movement verbs in Korean", Language Research, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003)
  33. Pustejovsky, J., "The generative lexicon", Computational Linguistics, 17(4), pp.409~441 (1991)
  34. Radden, G., "Cognitive linguistics in redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics", pp.423~458 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  35. 나양온, "Effects of construction-grammar-based instruction on the sentence production ability of Korean college learners of English", 박사, 외국어교육과 영어전공, pp.2014
  36. Shin, G. H., "Developmental aspects of English argument structure constructions for Korean-speaking second language learners : Usage-based constructional approaches to language development", Ampersand, 4, pp.10~20 (2017)
  37. Slobin, D. I., "Grammatical constructions: Their form and meanings", pp.157~219 (1996), Oxford University Press
  38. Slobin, D. I., "Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives", pp.219~257 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum
  39. Sohn, H-M., "Semantics of compound verbs in Korean", Linguistic Journal of Korea, 1(1), pp.142~150 (1976)
  40. Talmy, L., "Syntax and semantics", pp.181~238 (1975), Academic Press
  41. Talmy, L., "Language typology and syntactic description", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  42. Talmy, L., "Path to realization: A typology of event conflation", Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.480~519 (1991), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  43. Talmy, L., "Toward a cognitive semantics (vol. 1): Concept structuring systems" (2000), MIT Press
  44. Talmy, L., "Toward a cognitive semantics(vol. 2) : Typology and process in concept structure. Cambridge" (2000), MIT Press
  45. Vendler, Z., "Verbs and times", The Philosophical Review, 66(2), pp.143~160 (1957)
  46. Washio, R., "Resultatives, compositionality, and language variation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(1), pp.1~49 (1997)
  47. Wen, Z., "Proficiency effects and distance effects in nonnative processing of english number agreement", Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.445~456 (2010), Cascadilla
  48. Zlatev, J., "Relating events in narrative (vol. 2): Typological and contextual perspectives", pp.159~190 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)