제2 쇄빙연구선 건조사업의 과학기술적 편익
The Scientific Benefits from Building the 2nd Icebreaker Research Ship
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean government is considering the implementation of project to build the 2nd icebreaker research ship (IRS) to improve the level of arctic research. Information on the scientific benefits from the project is widely demanded for decision-making about whether to implement the project. In this regard, this study attempts to apply a choice experiment (CE) to measure the scientific benefits from the project in Korea by considering various attributes that are related to building the 2nd IRS. A survey of about 500 experts was undertaken and 123 experts completely responded to the survey. To deal with the CE data from the survey, we employ a multinomial logit (MNL) model. All the coefficient estimates are statistically significant and consistent with prior expectations. Therefore, we can judge that the respondents’ works required in the CE survey were within their cognitive abilities and they reported responsible and significant values. The results show that the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for building a 2nd IRS with the size of 12,000 ton relative to that with the size below 12,000 ton is estimated to be 260.85 billion won. In addition, the MWTPs for arctic exploration and research, arctic global environmental change research, arctic international R&D cooperation, and antarctic activity support are computed to be 1,001.25, 338.26, 245.57, and 609.27 billion won, respectively. The MWTPs for external use of the 2nd IRS during one month per year, more than 300 papers, and a patent are calculated to be 56.15, 320.72, and 1.40 billion won, respectively. All the MWTP estimates are statistically significant and provides good information on the scientific values about building the 2nd IRS. The results can be utilized in evaluating and planning several alternatives related to building the 2nd IRS.
Abstract
The Korean government is considering the implementation of project to build the 2nd icebreaker research ship (IRS) to improve the level of arctic research. Information on the scientific benefits from the project is widely demanded for decision-making about whether to implement the project. In this regard, this study attempts to apply a choice experiment (CE) to measure the scientific benefits from the project in Korea by considering various attributes that are related to building the 2nd IRS. A survey of about 500 experts was undertaken and 123 experts completely responded to the survey. To deal with the CE data from the survey, we employ a multinomial logit (MNL) model. All the coefficient estimates are statistically significant and consistent with prior expectations. Therefore, we can judge that the respondents’ works required in the CE survey were within their cognitive abilities and they reported responsible and significant values. The results show that the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for building a 2nd IRS with the size of 12,000 ton relative to that with the size below 12,000 ton is estimated to be 260.85 billion won. In addition, the MWTPs for arctic exploration and research, arctic global environmental change research, arctic international R&D cooperation, and antarctic activity support are computed to be 1,001.25, 338.26, 245.57, and 609.27 billion won, respectively. The MWTPs for external use of the 2nd IRS during one month per year, more than 300 papers, and a patent are calculated to be 56.15, 320.72, and 1.40 billion won, respectively. All the MWTP estimates are statistically significant and provides good information on the scientific values about building the 2nd IRS. The results can be utilized in evaluating and planning several alternatives related to building the 2nd IRS.
참고문헌 (23)
- 북극항로 개방현황 및 관련 조선 산업 기술동향, "강원수", KEIT PD, 73~84, pp.KEIT PD 이슈리포트. 2013-5호 (2013)
- 김윤옥, "북극해 이슈의 최근 동향과 시사점", KIEP 지역경제 포커스, 6(40), pp.1~13 (2012), 대외경제정책연구원
- 미래창조과학부, "북극정책 기본계획", 7~ (2013)
- 송주미, "북극항로 이용현황과 러시아의 상업화 정책", 계간 해양수산, 2(3), pp.106~121 (2012), 한국해양수산개발원
- 엄선희, "북극해에 대한 국제 동향과 우리의 대응 방향", 계간 해양수산, (2), pp.232~240 (2011), 한국해양수산개발원
- 북극개발의 기회와 대응, "이대식", 삼성경제연구소, 1~22, pp.CEO Information. 제892호 (2013)
- 진동민, "북극의 관리체제와 국제기구 : 북극이사회(Arctic Council)를 중심으로", Ocean and Polar Research, 32(1), pp.85~95 (2010), 한국해양과학기술원
- 문화시설의 가치추정 연구, "한국개발연구원", ~ (2004)
- 예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정·보완 연구(제5판), "한국개발연구원", ~ (2008)
- 대형 해양과학연구선 사업 예비타당성조사 보고서, "한국개발연구원", ~ (2009)
- 연구개발부문 사업의 예비타당성조사 표준지침 연구(제1판). 연구보고서, "한국과학기술기획평가원", ~ (2011)
- Adamowicz, W., "Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities", Journal of Environmental and Economics Management, 26, pp.271~292 (1994)
- Carlsson, F., "Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments", Ecological Economics, 47, pp.95~103 (2003)
- Elrod, T., "An Empirical Comparison of Ratings-Based and Choice-Based Conjoint Models", Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), pp.368~377 (1992)
- Gracia, A., "Consumers’valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study", Food Quality and Preference, 20, pp.463~471 (2009)
- Greene, W. H, "Econometric Analysis" (2000), Prentice Hall International
- Hanley, N., "Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment", Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, pp.413~428 (1998)
- Horne, P., "Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment", Forest Ecology and Management, 207, pp.189~199 (2005)
- Ku, S. J., "Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: A choice experiment study", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, pp.2196~2201 (2010)
- Kwak, S. Y., "Consumers’ willingness to pay for the 4th generation mobile communications service", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, pp.1312~1318 (2012)
- Kwak, S. Y., "Valuing energy-saving measures in residential buildings: a choice experiment study", Energy Policy, 38, pp.673~677 (2010)
- Lim, S. Y., "External benefits of waste-to-energy in Korea: A choice experiment study", Renewable &Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, pp.588~595 (2014)
- Arctic Opening: Opportunity and Risk in the high north, "Lloyd's and Chatham house", Lloyd's report, ~ (2012)