Effect of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence in Patients With Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to assess whether nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP) is associated with improved recovery of urinary continence compared to non–nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nnsRP) in patients with localized prostate cancer and preoperative erectile dysfunction. Methods: A total of 360 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and an International Index of Erectile Function score of less than 17 were treated with nsRP or nnsRP in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy or had a history of prostate-related surgery were excluded. Recovery of urinary continence was assessed at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Postoperative recovery of continence was defined as zero pad usage. The association between nerve-sparing status and urinary continence was assessed by using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses after controlling for known predictive factors. Results: Urinary continence recovered in 279 patients (77.5%) within the mean follow-up period of 22.5 months (range, 6–123 months). Recovery of urinary continence was reported in 74.6% and 86.4% of patients after nnsRP and nsRP, respectively, at 12 months (P=0.022). All groups had comparable perioperative criteria and had no significant preoperative morbidities. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and nerve-sparing status were significantly associated with recovery of urinary continence on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.254; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002–1.478; P=0.026) and nerve-sparing status (HR, 0.713; 95% CI, 0.548–0.929; P=0.012) were independently associated with recovery of urinary continence. Conclusions: nsRP, as compared to nnsRP, improves recovery rates of urinary incontinence and decreases surgical morbidity without compromising pathologic outcomes.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to assess whether nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nsRP) is associated with improved recovery of urinary continence compared to non–nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (nnsRP) in patients with localized prostate cancer and preoperative erectile dysfunction. Methods: A total of 360 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and an International Index of Erectile Function score of less than 17 were treated with nsRP or nnsRP in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. Patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy or had a history of prostate-related surgery were excluded. Recovery of urinary continence was assessed at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Postoperative recovery of continence was defined as zero pad usage. The association between nerve-sparing status and urinary continence was assessed by using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses after controlling for known predictive factors. Results: Urinary continence recovered in 279 patients (77.5%) within the mean follow-up period of 22.5 months (range, 6–123 months). Recovery of urinary continence was reported in 74.6% and 86.4% of patients after nnsRP and nsRP, respectively, at 12 months (P=0.022). All groups had comparable perioperative criteria and had no significant preoperative morbidities. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and nerve-sparing status were significantly associated with recovery of urinary continence on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.254; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002–1.478; P=0.026) and nerve-sparing status (HR, 0.713; 95% CI, 0.548–0.929; P=0.012) were independently associated with recovery of urinary continence. Conclusions: nsRP, as compared to nnsRP, improves recovery rates of urinary incontinence and decreases surgical morbidity without compromising pathologic outcomes.
참고문헌 (21)
- 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2011", Cancer Research and Treatment, 46(2), pp.109~123 (2014), 대한암학회
- Finley DS, "Hypothermic robotic radical prostatectomy: impact on continence", J Endourol, 23, pp.1443~1450 (2009)
- Lei Y, "Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:description of technique and outcomes", Eur Urol, 59, pp.235~243 (2011)
- Joshi N, "Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial", Eur Urol, 58, pp.84~89 (2010)
- Ficarra V, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.405~417 (2012)
- Burkhard FC, "Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy:does it have an impact on urinary continence?", J Urol, 176, pp.189~195 (2006)
- Nandipati KC, "Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy", Urology, 70, pp.1127~1130 (2007)
- Kundu SD, "Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies", J Urol, 172(6 Pt 1), pp.2227~2231 (2004)
- Tzou DT, "The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy:attention to study design", Urol Oncol, 27, pp.358~362 (2009)
- Choi IY, "Development of prostate cancer research database with the clinical data warehouse technology for direct linkage with electronic medical record system", Prostate Int, 1, pp.59~64 (2013)
- Mattei A, "Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles", Eur Urol, 52, pp.687~694 (2007)
- 이신우, "Effect of Continuous Urethro-Vesical Anastomosis Technique in Incontinence After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy, 1:1 Matching Study", International Neurourology Journal, 19(2), pp.113~119 (2015), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회
- Stember DS, "Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor for decision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy", J Sex Med, 10, pp.2101~2107 (2013)
- Lavery HJ, "Active patient decision making regarding nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach", J Urol, 186, pp.487~492 (2011)
- Suardi N, "Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery", BJU Int, 111, pp.717~722 (2013)
- Khoder WY, "Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study", World J Urol, 33, pp.301~307 (2015)
- Harris CR, "Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 190, pp.981~986 (2013)
- Reeves F, "Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur Urol, 68, pp.692~704 (2015)
- John H, "Effect of radical prostatectomy on urethral blood flow", Urology, 59, pp.566~569 (2002)
- John H, "Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission", J Urol, 163, pp.1761~1766 (2000)
- Catarin MV, "The role of membranous urethral afferent autonomic innervation in the continence mechanism after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a clinical and prospective study", J Urol, 180, pp.2527~2531 (2008)