본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Long-term Outcomes of Prostate Capsule-Sparing and Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy With Neobladder: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to compare and analyze the feasibility and long-term efficacy of prostatic capsule-sparing (PCS) and nerve-sparing (NS) radical cystectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer. Methods: From June 2004 to December 2021, our institution treated and followed 145 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with neobladder reconstruction for over a year. These patients were divided into 2 groups: PCS (n=74) and NS (n=71). To minimize potential biases, 1:1 propensity score matching was utilized to compare oncological outcomes, function aloutcomes, and complications between the groups. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate survival differences between the PCS and NS groups. Results: The median follow-up durations for PCS and NS were 155 and 122 months, respectively. After adjusting for propen sityscores, a total of 96 patients (48 in each group) were included for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant differences in metastasis-free probability (P=0.206), cancer-specific survival (P=0.091), and overall survival (P=0.208). The daytime urinary control (UC) rate at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was 72.9%, 91.7%, and 97.9% in the PCS group and 47.9%, 79.2%, and 91.7% in the NS group, respectively (P=0.012, P=0.083, and P=0.362). The nocturnal UC rate was 54.2%, 85.4%, and 95.8% in the PCS group, and 31.3%, 60.4%, and 83.3% in the NS group, respectively (P=0.023, P=0.006, and P=0.091). Regarding erectile function recovery, 62.5% of patients in the PCS group and 22.9% in the NS group returned to preoperative levels (P<0.001). Conclusions: PCS outperformed NS in restoring UC and sexual function and did not affect oncological outcomes. However, PCS was associated with a higher risk of complications linked to bladder-neck obstruction.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare and analyze the feasibility and long-term efficacy of prostatic capsule-sparing (PCS) and nerve-sparing (NS) radical cystectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer. Methods: From June 2004 to December 2021, our institution treated and followed 145 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with neobladder reconstruction for over a year. These patients were divided into 2 groups: PCS (n=74) and NS (n=71). To minimize potential biases, 1:1 propensity score matching was utilized to compare oncological outcomes, function aloutcomes, and complications between the groups. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate survival differences between the PCS and NS groups. Results: The median follow-up durations for PCS and NS were 155 and 122 months, respectively. After adjusting for propen sityscores, a total of 96 patients (48 in each group) were included for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant differences in metastasis-free probability (P=0.206), cancer-specific survival (P=0.091), and overall survival (P=0.208). The daytime urinary control (UC) rate at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was 72.9%, 91.7%, and 97.9% in the PCS group and 47.9%, 79.2%, and 91.7% in the NS group, respectively (P=0.012, P=0.083, and P=0.362). The nocturnal UC rate was 54.2%, 85.4%, and 95.8% in the PCS group, and 31.3%, 60.4%, and 83.3% in the NS group, respectively (P=0.023, P=0.006, and P=0.091). Regarding erectile function recovery, 62.5% of patients in the PCS group and 22.9% in the NS group returned to preoperative levels (P<0.001). Conclusions: PCS outperformed NS in restoring UC and sexual function and did not affect oncological outcomes. However, PCS was associated with a higher risk of complications linked to bladder-neck obstruction.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Jue JS, "Systematic review of robotic radical cystectomy functional and quality of life outcomes", Can Urol Assoc J, 16, pp.E102~E107 (2022)
  2. Xiong X, "Effect of neurovascular bundle sparing radical cystectomy on post-operative continence and sexual function : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Andrology, 9, pp.221~232 (2021)
  3. Moschini M, "Critical review of outcomes from radical cystectomy : can complications from radical cystectomy be reduced by surgical volume and robotic surgery?", Eur Urol Focus, 2, pp.19~29 (2016)
  4. Schilling A, "Transprostatic selective cystectomy with anileal bladder", Eur Urol, 18, pp.253~257 (1990)
  5. Schlegel PN, "Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function", J Urol, 138, pp.1402~1406 (1987)
  6. Clay R, "Oncological and functional outcomes of organ-preserving cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy : a systematic review and metaanalysis", BJUI Compass, 4, pp.135~155 (2022)
  7. Voskuilen CS, "Prostate sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer : a two-center study", Eur J Surg Oncol, 44, pp.1446~1452 (2018)
  8. Thakare N, "Orthotopic bladder substitution : surgical aspects and optimization of outcomes", BJUI Compass, 2, pp.359~369 (2021)
  9. Mertens LS, "Prostate sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer : 20-year single center experience", J Urol, 191, pp.1250~1255 (2014)
  10. Hernández V, "Oncological and functional outcomes of sexual function-preserving cystectomy compared with standard radical cystectomy in men : a systematic review", Urol Oncol, 35, pp.539~ (2017)
  11. Martini A, "Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction : techniques and functional outcomes in males", Eur Urol, 84, pp.484~490 (2023)
  12. Furrer MA, "Nerve-sparing radical cystectomy has a beneficial impact on urinary continence after orthotopic bladder substitution, which becomes even more apparent over time", BJU Int, 121, pp.935~944 (2018)
  13. Cheng Q, "Nervespring technique could achieve a functional trifecta outcome of robotic intracorporeal studer’s orthotopic neobladder in the male", Bladder(San Franc), 9, pp.e50~ (2022)
  14. Yu J, "Impact of urinary diversion type on urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer : propensity score matched and weighted analyses of retrospective cohort", Int J Surg, 110, pp.700~708 (2024)
  15. Piramide F, "Atlas of intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder techniques after robot-assisted radical cystectomy and systematic review of clinical outcomes", Eur Urol, 85, pp.348~360 (2024)
  16. Jacobs BL, "Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer : results of a randomized, controlled trial", J Urol, 193, pp.64~70 (2015)
  17. Zhu Z, "Application of pubovesical complex preserving technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", Chin J Urol, 39, pp.515~521 (2018)
  18. Zhu Z, "Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy with antireflux neobadder reconstruction", Chin J Minim Invasive Surg, 21, pp.879~883 (2021)
  19. Zhu Z, "Ileum valvuloplasty and pulling antireflux technique for ureteroileal anastomosis in orthotopic ileal neobadder", Chin J Urol, 36, pp.672~675 (2015)
  20. Bahlburg H, "Prospective evaluation of functional outcomes in 395 patients with an ileal neobladder 1 year after radical cystectomy", World J Urol, 41, pp.2367~2374 (2023)
  21. Dindo D, "Classification of surgical complications : a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336patients and results of a survey", Ann Surg, 240, pp.205~213 (2004)
  22. He W, "Pelvic reconstruction and lateral prostate capsule sparing techniques improve early continence of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder", Int Urol Nephrol, 54, pp.1537~1543 (2022)
  23. Wong CH, "Long term outcomes of orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion in robot assisted radical cystectomy(RARC) : multicenter results from the Asian RARC Consortium", Ann Surg Oncol, 31, pp.5785~5793 (2024)
  24. Tuderti G, "Long term oncologic and functional outcomes following robot assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal Padua ileal bladder : results from a single high volume center", World J Urol, 41, pp.2359~2366 (2023)
  25. Botto H, "Prostatic capsule-and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder carcinoma : initial results for selected patients", BJU Int, 94, pp.1021~1025 (2004)
  26. Furrer MA, "Seminal vesical sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer is feasible with good functional results without impairing oncological outcomes : a longitudinal long-term propensity-matched single center study", J Urol, 205, pp.1629~1640 (2021)
  27. Wang X, "Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer : a single-center, blinded, controlled study", BMC Cancer, 21, pp.887~ (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence in Patients With Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction권오성, 김세웅, 박용현, 이지열, 홍성후, 황태곤대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2016 · 제20권 제1호A Prospective Analysis of the Effects of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence Based on Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and International Index of Erectile Function Scoring SystemsBurkhardt Seifert, Karolin Bossert, Kurt Lehmann, Lukas Hefermehl, Venkat M. Ramakrishnan대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2018 · 제22권 제2호Functional recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer고영휘영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2018 · 제35권 제2호Oncologic, Perioperative Outcomes of Female Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multicenter Study in Korea강석호, 구자현, 서호경, 심지성, 정병창, 홍범식대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제3호Effects of Complete Bladder Cuff Removal on Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma강민용, 김준규, 김태진, 류현수, 서성일, 성현환, 이현무, 전성수, 전황균, 정병창대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제3호Oncological and functional outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a single institution: a minimum 5-year follow-up강준구, 권태균, 김범수, 김태환, 김현태, 윤길숙, 이준녕, 정재욱, 천소영, 최석환, 하윤석영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2018 · 제35권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)