Therapeutic Efficacy of a New Procedure for Male Urinary Incontinence Combining a Suburethral Polypropylene Mesh and Cardiovascular Patch
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men is a complication secondary to prostatectomy or resulting from neurological lesions. This study presents our experiences with male suburethral slings over the past decade. Methods: In this study, we considered patients who presented with SUI and were diagnosed with an intrinsic sphincteric deficiency due to postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) or other causes (non-PPI). Patients who underwent the suburethral sling procedure using a polypropylene mesh and a cardiovascular patch were retrospectively included. An urodynamic study was performed before and after the operation. Global response assessment (GRA) and SUI grading were used for surgical outcome. The revision rate and the infection rate were also evaluated. Results: A total 31 patients were enrolled in this study; the mean patient age was 59.5±18.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.9±29.4 months. Fourteen patients comprised the non-PPI group and 17 were in the PPI group. The preoperative SUI of all patients were categorized as a moderate to severe problem according to the SUI grade, with a mean score of 2.32±0.48 before the operation and 0.48±0.57 after the operation. With a mean score of 2.35±0.71, GRA showed that the patients were satisfied with the treatment. After the sling procedure, 4 patients (13%) reported a mild improvement, 12 (38.7%) a moderate improvement, while 15 (48.4%) reported an excellent improvement. Six patients (19.4%), including 5 from the non-PPI group (35.7%) and 1 (5.9%) from the PPI group (P=0.037), underwent sling removal because of infection. Conclusions: The male suburethral sling procedure using a polypropylene mesh and a cardiovascular patch is a safe, efficacious, and inexpensive surgical procedure for PPI. In cases of neurological incontinence, however, the higher infection rate in non-PPI patients means that they should be carefully managed.
Abstract
Purpose: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men is a complication secondary to prostatectomy or resulting from neurological lesions. This study presents our experiences with male suburethral slings over the past decade. Methods: In this study, we considered patients who presented with SUI and were diagnosed with an intrinsic sphincteric deficiency due to postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) or other causes (non-PPI). Patients who underwent the suburethral sling procedure using a polypropylene mesh and a cardiovascular patch were retrospectively included. An urodynamic study was performed before and after the operation. Global response assessment (GRA) and SUI grading were used for surgical outcome. The revision rate and the infection rate were also evaluated. Results: A total 31 patients were enrolled in this study; the mean patient age was 59.5±18.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.9±29.4 months. Fourteen patients comprised the non-PPI group and 17 were in the PPI group. The preoperative SUI of all patients were categorized as a moderate to severe problem according to the SUI grade, with a mean score of 2.32±0.48 before the operation and 0.48±0.57 after the operation. With a mean score of 2.35±0.71, GRA showed that the patients were satisfied with the treatment. After the sling procedure, 4 patients (13%) reported a mild improvement, 12 (38.7%) a moderate improvement, while 15 (48.4%) reported an excellent improvement. Six patients (19.4%), including 5 from the non-PPI group (35.7%) and 1 (5.9%) from the PPI group (P=0.037), underwent sling removal because of infection. Conclusions: The male suburethral sling procedure using a polypropylene mesh and a cardiovascular patch is a safe, efficacious, and inexpensive surgical procedure for PPI. In cases of neurological incontinence, however, the higher infection rate in non-PPI patients means that they should be carefully managed.
참고문헌 (17)
- Abrams P, "The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function : report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society", Neurourol Urodyn, 21, pp.167~178 (2002)
- Montague DK, "Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy", J Urol, 166, pp.547~549 (2001)
- Ostrowski I, "Current interventional management of male stress urinary incontinence following urological procedures", Cent European J Urol, 68, pp.340~347 (2015)
- Trost L, "Male stress urinary incontinence : a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes", Adv Urol, 2012, pp.287489~ (2012)
- Stamey TA, "Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence", Surg Gynecol Obstet, 136, pp.547~554 (1973)
- Rodriguez E Jr, "Post-robotic prostatectomy urinary continence : characterization of perfect continence versus occasional dribbling in pad-free men", Urology, 67, pp.785~788 (2006)
- Bauer RM, "Postprostatectomy incontinence : all about diagnosis and management", Eur Urol, 55, pp.322~333 (2009)
- Ke QS, "A suburethral sling for stress urinary incontinence in men", JTUA, 20, pp.15~20 (2009)
- Caremel R, "Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Anything new in its management?", Can Urol Assoc J, 8, pp.202~212 (2014)
- Welk BK, "The male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence : a review of contemporary sling designs and outcomes", BJU Int, 109, pp.328~344 (2012)
- Bauer RM, "Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence", Eur Urol, 59, pp.985~996 (2011)
- Raj GV, "Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter", J Urol, 173, pp.1242~1245 (2005)
- Imamoglu MA, "The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence", Eur Urol, 47, pp.209~213 (2005)
- Onur R, "Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence", Int J Urol, 13, pp.1207~1211 (2006)
- Lightner D, "A new injectable bulking agent for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind study of Durasphere", Urology, 58, pp.12~15 (2001)
- Malizia AA Jr, "Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef(Teflon)", JAMA, 251, pp.3277~3281 (1984)
- Guimarães M, "Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery", BJU Int, 103, pp.500~504 (2009)